Axiological shift in the analysis of entrepreneurial identity and entrepreneurial action
The article explores on the analysis of the lack of understanding of modern entrepreneurial identity and entrepreneurial action by using functionalist theories. The current situation with high and humanitarian technologies changes the role structure of developers and consumers of new technologies, increasing the significance of interpretive phenomena. The analysis of entrepreneurial actions in the context of theories of autopoiesis and system anthropological psychology makes it possible to identify important characteristics of the psychological activity of participants in technological breakthroughs and the structure of the axiological shift in entrepreneurship. In the study we revealed factors of basic compliances of entrepreneurial action: the value unity of structural binding and ontological fluctuation, heterogeneity of axiological fundamentals of historical types of entrepreneurial identities and modes of values. The analysis allows to determine the general axiological order arising on the basis of cognitive determination such as involvement. Accordingly, engagement, effectiveness and involvement could be presented as actual heterogeneous socio-psychological fundamental for large axiological and historical entities with their inherent modes of entrepreneurial action, types of identities and modes of value. The result of the analysis of theories shows that currently the idea of specific ways of symbolizing values based on people's involvement in life worlds created by entrepreneurs and the performative involvement of entrepreneurs themselves in the network of functioning of these worlds could be provided only at the pre-theoretical (metaphorical) level. However, this does not mean that there are no socio-psychological signs of the emergence of new value orientations. New value orientations are manifested in the emergence of aspects of entrepreneurial activity which go beyond relations of effectiveness. Due to the tendency of dominance as a cognitive basis of the entrepreneurial action of human relationships, performative rhetoric becomes the mechanism of persuasion in the value of a product. The essence of performativity is that the value comes from something that is a value in itself. The proto-value for the conditions of the society is the original network of subjectivities (mental models of the creators of devices and their successors), brought about by entrepreneurial action. This primary network value has the potential to be expanded into the real value for future adherents of new life style and external beneficiaries of the broad social network that supports it, because it is valuable for the creators themselves, and it forms the life world they share.
Keywords
ценность,
предпринимательское действие,
идентичность,
габитус,
роль,
статус,
субъективность,
структурное связанность,
онтологическое колебание,
жизненный мир,
предпринимательство,
вовлеченность,
value,
entrepreneurial action,
identity,
habit,
role,
status,
subjectivity,
structural cohesion,
ontological fluctuation,
lifeworld,
entrepreneurship,
involvementAuthors
Baryshev Aleksey A. | Tomsk State University | barishevnp@mail.ru |
Lukyanov Oleg V. | Tomsk State University | lukyanov7@gmail.com |
Всего: 2
References
Леонтьев Д.А. Личность в непредсказуемом мире // Методология и история психоло гии. 2010. Т. 5, вып. 3. С. 120-140.
Клочко В.Е., Галажинский Э.В., Краснорядцева О.М., Лукьянов О.В. Системная ан тропологическая психология: понятийный аппарат // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2015. № 56. С. 9-20. DOI 10.17223/17267080/56/2.
Maturana H.R. Self-consciousness: How? When? Where? // Constructivist Foundations. 2006. Vol. 1, № 3. P. 93-95.
Varela F.J. Patterns of Life: Intertwining Identity and Cognition // Brain and Cognition. 1997. Vol. 34. P. 72-87.
Chiles T.H., Tuggle C.S., McMullen J.S., Bierman L., Greening D.W. Dynamic Creation: Extending the Radical Austrian Approach to Entrepreneurship // Organization Studies. 2010. Vol. 31 (1). P. 7-46.
Baryshev A.A., Barysheva G.A. Social Entrepreneurship: Metaphysics of Entrepreneurship in Practice // The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS). 2016. Vol. 7: Lifelong Wellbeing in the World (WELLSO 2015). P. 352-365.
Хэннан М., Фримен Дж. Популяционная экология организаций // Экономическая со циология. 2013 Т. 14, № 2. 42-72
Димаджио П.Дж., Пауэлл. У.В. Новый взгляд на «железную клетку»: институциональ ный изоморфизм и коллективная рациональность в организационных полях // Экономическая социология. 2010.Т. 11, № 1. С. 35-56.
Бурдье П. Физическое и социальное пространство // Бурдье П. Социология социаль ного пространства : пер. с фр. / отв. ред. пер. Н.А. Шматко. СПб. : Алетейя, 2015. С. 49-63.
Лукьянов О.В Принцип транстемпоральности в решении вопроса успешности и актуальности психологической практики // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2007. № 25. С. 59-66.
Berglund H. Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Action: Exploring Risk, Opportunity and Self in Technology Entrepreneurship : doctoral dissertation / Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology. Goteborg, 2005. P. 35-36.
Szeman I. Entrepreneurship as the New Common Sense // The South Atlantic Quarterly. 2015. Vol. 114 (3). P. 471-490.
Lachmann L. Capital and its structure. Kansas City : Sheed, Andrews & McMeel, 1956. P. 13.
Латур Б. Пересборка социального. Введение в акторно-сетевую теорию / Нац исслед. ун-т «Высшая школа экономики. М., 2014.
Weick K.E. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications, 1995. 248 p.
Callon M. What does it mean to say that economics is performative? // Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics / ed. by D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, L. Siu. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2007. Р. 311-357.
Дойч Д. Начало бесконечности: Объяснения, которые меняют мир. М. : Альпина нон-фикшн, 2016. 582 с.
Baryshev A.A. Entrepreneurial action as metaphorical process and its metaphorics // International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation. 2017. Vol. 9 (1). P. 24-39/
Uexkull T. von. Introduction: The sign theory of Jakob von Uexkull // Semiotica. 1992. Vol. 89 (4). P. 279-315.
Скот В.Р. Современная институциональная теория // Теория организации : хрестоматия / Высш. школа менеджмента СПбГУ. СПб. : Высшая школа менеджмента, 2010. С. 266-303.
Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA : Sage Publications, 2008. 267 p.
Бруннер К. Представление о человеке и концепция социума: два подхода к пониманию общества // THESIS: теория и история экономических и социальных институтов и систем. 1993. № 3. С. 51-72. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/6409 (дата обращения: 25.08.2017).
Барышев А.А. Метафорика ценностного подхода к предпринимательскому действию // Вестник науки Сибири : электронный научный журнал. 2016. № 1 (20). С. 111-132.
Melnik A.E., Baryshev A.A. Intellect-based enterprise: the entrepreneur's dilemma and its solution through the unleashing of entrepreneurial subjectivity and burgeoning of a new modus of value // 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2017, SGEM2017 Conference Proceedings, 24-30 August, 2017. Book 5, vol. 45. P. 549-556.
Хархордин О.В.Предисловие редактора // Латур Б. Нового времени не было : эссе по симмеиричной антропологии. СПб. : Изд-во Европ. ун-та в С.-Петерб., 2006. С. 5-56.
Baryshev A.A. The genesis and generation of social value: the rise of entrepreneurial subjectivity and specifics of its value-creating action // 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2017, SGEM2017 Conference Proceedings, 24-30 August, 2017. Book 1, vol 4. P. 815-822.