Psychological factors of social exclusion experience
The study is devoted to revealing the psychological factors of social exclusion experience. To bring to light the basic components we used the factor analysis. It educed four factors of social exclusion experience. Moreover, the research demonstrated that social exclusion leaded to a whole network of vulnerability to stress symptoms and to the probable second exclusion. The first component was called a factor of person's vulnerability. In this article, from the point of view of system approach, the person's vulnerability is interpreted as a structured network of evident symptoms (e.g., empirical indications), as the effect of person's response to traumatic stress event of social exclusion experience. Hereafter, appeared structured symptom network will influence both the system state and its behavior on the whole, and, with high probability, a person will be vulnerable for the next stress events. It, without suitable therapeutic intervention, may determinate the intensive development of pathological processes on the level of body and mental functioning. The second component was called a conformism factor. In this article conformism is interpreted as a psychological protection that is used to cope with social exclusion experience. A person who has experienced the social exclusion behaves in ways to fit, to make passive institutionalization, agrees with opinions and views, which exist within the desirable social group. The person unconditionally follows the behavior patterns, which have the biggest bandwagon effect power, and he refuses his own viewpoint. The person loses his authenticity, and in future it may become a reason for existential crisis. The third component was called the outside directed aggression factor. A person, who experiences social exclusion, feels disappointment about social group members' behavior. This feeling is probably correlated with cognitive depreciation of social group importance for satisfaction of person's actual needs, and it is correlated with a desire to make aggressive actions towards the social group. The fourth component was called the inside directed aggression factor. One, who experiences the social exclusion, may transfer destructive activities from outside interaction with social groups into inside interaction with himself. Interrupted connections with one's own inner experiences through addicted behavior (indirect auto-aggression) and self-damaging behavior (direct auto-aggression) are the ways of realization of such destructive activity. In conclusion, it is important to note that the social exclusion is the preconditioned and natural product of stable social group cohesion. It is not always useful, however, according to pathological processes within excluding and excluded social group members, but it is important to focus on psychological and social processes during the work with a person, who experiences the social exclusion. The analysis of such processes is important to pay attention to actual social exclusion experience for individuals and social groups. This experience makes and opens a potential highway for strategic interventions, directed on social inclusion advancement.
Keywords
социальная эксклюзия,
психологическая уязвимость личности,
социальная группа,
факторный анализ,
потребность в принадлежности,
social exclusion,
psychological vulnerability of person,
social group,
factor analysis,
affiliation needAuthors
Shulmin Maksim P. | Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics | scoobi@inbox.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R. The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation // Psychological Bulletin. 1995. Vol. 117, № 3. P. 497-529.
Brewer M. The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1991. № 17 (5). P. 475-482. DOI: 10.1177/0146167291175001.
Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss. New York : Basic Books, 1973. Vol. 2: Separation: Anxiety and Anger. 212 p.
Leary M.R. Towards a Conceptualization of Interpersonal Rejection // Interpersonal Rejec tion / ed. M.R. Leary. New York : Oxford University Press, 2001. P. 3-20. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130157.003.0001.
Leary M.R. Responses to Social Exclusion: Social Anxiety, Jealousy, Loneliness, Depres sion, and Low Self-Esteem // Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1990. № 9. P. 221-229. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.221.
Williams, K.D. Ostracism: The Power of Silence. New York : Guilford Press, 2002. 282 p.
Бородкин Ф. Социальные эксклюзии // Социологический журнал. 2000. № 3-4. С. 5-17.
Ефлова М.Ю. Социальная эксклюзия социально депривированных групп населения (на примере наркопотребителей и ВИЧ-инфицированных). Казань : Казан ун-т, 2012. 164 с.
Чупров В.И., Зубок Ю.А., Уильямс К. Молодежь в обществе риска. М. : Наука, 2003. 161 с.
Суворова И.Ю. Социальная эксклюзия как социально-психологический феномен // Социальная психология и общество. 2014. Т. 5, № 4. С. 29-41.
Abrams D., Hogg M.A. & Marques J.M. The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion. New York : Psychology Press, 2005. 270 p.
Leary M.R. Varieties of Interpersonal Rejection // The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying / eds. K.D. Williams, J.P. Forgas & B. von Hippel. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2005. P. 35-51.
Baumeister R.F. & Tice D.M. Anxiety and Social Exclusion // Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1990. № 9. P. 165-195. DOI: 10.1521/ jscp.1990.9.2.165.
Marcus D.K. & Askari N.H. Dysphoria and Interpersonal Rejection. A Social Relations Analysis // Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1999. № 18. P. 370-384.
Williams K.D., Cheung C.K.T. & Choi W. Cyber Ostracism: Effects of Being Ignored over the Internet // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. № 79. P. 748-762.
Barden R.C., Garber J., Leiman B. et al. Factors Governing the Effective Remediation of Negative Affect and its Cognitive and Behavioral Consequences // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985. № 49. P. 1040-1053.
Hoyle R.H. & Crawford A.M. Use of Individual-Level Data to Investigate Group Phenomena Issues and Strategies // Small Group Research. 1994. № 25. P. 464-485.
Gonsalkorale K. & Williams K.D. The KKK Won't Let Me Play: Ostracism even by Adespised Out-Group Hurts // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2007. № 37. P. 1176-1186. DOI:10.1002ejsp.392.
Smith A. & Williams K.D. R U There? Effects of Ostracism by Cell Phone Messages // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2004. № 8. P. 291-301.
Social Exclusion Unit. Preventing Social Exclusion : Report by the Social Exclusion Unit. 2001. URL: https://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/seu/index.htm (accessed: 07.02.2018).
Zadro L., Williams K.D. & Richardson R. How Low Can You Go? Ostracism by a Computer Lowers Belonging, Control, Self-Esteem, and Meaningful Existence // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004. № 40. P. 560-567. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006.
McLaughlin-Volpe T., Aron A., Wright S.C. & Lewandowski G.W., Jr. Exclusion of the Self by Close Others and by Groups: Implications of the Self-Expansion Model // The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion / eds. D. Abrams, M.A. Hogg & J.M. Marques. New York : Psychology Press, 2005. P. 113-134.
Abramson L.Y., Seligman M.E.P. & Teasdale J.D. Learned Helplessness in Humans: Critique and Reformulation // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1978. № 87. P. 49-74.
Deci E.L. & Ryan R.M. A Motivational Approach to Self: Integration in Personality // Nebraska Symposium on Motivation / ed. R. Dienstbier. Lincoln, NE : University of Nebraska Press, 1991. P. 237-288.
Dweck C.S. & Leggett E. A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality // Psychological Review. 1988. № 95. P. 256-273.
Skinner E.A. Perceived Control: Motivation, Coping, and Development // Self-efficacy: Thought Control of Action / ed. R. Schwarzer. London : Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1992. P. 91-106.
MacDonald G. & Leary M.R. Why Does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship between Social and Physical Pain // Psychological Bulletin. 2005. № 131. P. 202-223. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202.
Williams K.D. Ostracism // Annual Review of Psychology. 2007. № 58. P. 425-452.
Eisenberger N.I., Lieberman M.D. & Williams K.D. Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion // Science. 2003. № 302. P. 290-292. DOI: 10.1126/science.1089134.
Durkheim E. Suicide: A Study in Sociology / trl. by J.A. Spaulding & G. Simpson. Glencoe, IL : Free Press, 1951. 376 p.
Baker F.M. Black Youth Suicide: Literature Review with a Focus on Prevention // Journal of the National Medical Association. 1990. № 82. P. 495-507.
Bateman C. Young, Black, Female and Miserable // South African Medical Journal. 2001. № 91. P. 716-717.
Blum R.W., Beuhring T., Shew M.L. et al. The Effects of Race / Ethnicity, Income, and Family Structure on Adolescent Risk Behaviors // American Journal Public Health. 2000. № 90. P. 1879-1884.
Boardman A.P., Grimbaldeston A.H., Handley C. et al. The North Staffordshire Suicide Study: a Case-Control Study of Suicide in One Health District // Psychological Medicine. 1999. № 29. P. 27-33.
Gibbs J.T. African-American Suicide: a Cultural Paradox // Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior. 1997. № 27. P. 68-79.
Joiner T. Why People Die by Suicide. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2005. 288 p.
Lewinsohn P.M., Rohde P. & Seeley J.R. Psychosocial Characteristics of Adolescents with a History of Suicide Attempt // Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1993. № 32. P. 60-68.
Crighton D. & Towl G. Intentional Self-Injury // Suicide in Prisons / eds. G. Towl, L. Snow & M. McHugh. Leicester : British Psychological Society, 2002. P. 48-56.
Gratz K.L. Risk Factors for and Functions of Deliberate Self-Harm: an Empirical and Conceptual Review // Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2003. № 10. P. 192-205.
Compton M.T., Thompson N.J. & Kaslow N.J. Social Environment Factors Associated with Suicide Attempt among Low-Income African Americans: the Protective Role of Family Relationships and Social Support // Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2005. № 40. P. 175-185.
Dervic K., Oquendo M.A., Grunebaum M.F. et al. Religious Affiliation and Suicide Attempt // American Journal of Psychiatry. 2004. № 161. P. 2303-2308.
Bailey M. & McLaren S. Physical Activity Alone and with Others as Predictors of Sense of Belonging and Mental Health in Retirees // Aging & Mental Health. 2005. № 9. P. 82-90.
Cramer A.O.J., Waldorp L.J., van der Maas H.L.J., Borsboom D. Comorbidity: a Network Perspective // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2010. № 33. P. 137-193.
Schmittmann V.D., Cramer A.O.J., Waldorp L.J., Epskamp S., Kievit R.A., Borsboom D. Deconstructing the Construct: a Network Perspective on Psychological Phenomena // New Ideas Psychology. 2013. № 31. P. 43-53.
Borsboom D. Psychometric Perspectives on Diagnostic Systems // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2008a. № 64. P. 1089-1109. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20503.
Reise S.P., Waller N.G. Item Response Theory and Clinical Measurement // Annual Reviews Clinical Psychology. 2009. № 5. P. 27-48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553.
Barlow D.H., Allen L.B., Choate M.L. Toward a Unified Treatment for Emotional Disorders // Behavior Therapy. 2004. № 35. P. 205-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.005.
Kendell R.E. The Concept of Disease and its Implications for Psychiatry // British Journal of Psychiatry. 1975. № 127. P. 305-315.