The Value Orientations System of Generation Z: Social, Cultural and Demographic Determinants | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2019. № 72. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/3

The Value Orientations System of Generation Z: Social, Cultural and Demographic Determinants

Values of each generation are perceived as derivatives of objective conditions of their socioeconomic situation. In regards to how Generation Z (those who were born since 1995) socialize, they are often characterized by postmaterialism and refusal to adhere to the traditional value system, which results in the "world-view break" from the preceding generations, and substantial diversity of their values. Nonetheless, the influence of belonging to a certain social community on the value hierarchy of Generation Z has not been thoroughly researched yet. The abovementioned issue has determined the aim of our research: assessing the influence of socio-cultural and demographic determinants on the formation of the Generation Z value orientations system. The present study used Shalom H. Schwartz's method on the sample of 1251 representatives of Generation Z of various sex, age, nationality, religion, residence and education. The research took place in the following regions: Siberia (Kemerovo, Chita, Ulan-Ude); the Far East (Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky); Central Russia (mostly Moscow and Moscow Region); Ukraine (Rovno, Khmelnitsky, Ternopol and others). We have found that the most distinctive common feature of Generation Z is the priority of independence in terms of opinions and agency, as well as lack of adherence to the existing traditions. In addition, belonging to a certain gender, ethnic, confessional or religious community determines the qualitative identity of the value hierarchy of today's youth. Particularly, belonging to a national or religious minority or a traditional confession, as well as identifying as residents of the countryside are factors that contribute to preservation of collectivist and traditional values. By contrast, living in a metropolitan city or a cross-border region and not being involved in a religious community result in higher importance of individualistic and postmaterialistic values. The study has proven that, despite noticeable changes in the system of value orientations of the new generation, the significance and role of institutions and the factors that underlie formation of said values remain unchanged. The identified patterns determine the possibility of predicting how values transform in public consciousness and what corresponding changes in social behavior follow.

Download file
Counter downloads: 497

Keywords

ценности, ценностные ориентации, ментальность, социокультурная среда, социализация, молодежь, теория поколений, поколение Z, values, value orientations, mentality, socio-cultural environment, socialization, youth, theory of generations, Generation Z

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Yanitskij Mikhail S.Kemerovo State Universitydirektorspi@kemsu.ru
Seryj Andrej V.Kemerovo State University
Braun Olga A.Kemerovo State University
Pelekh Yurij V.Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowayuriipelekh@gmail.com
Maslova Olga V.Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Sokolskaya Marina V.Russian University of Transportmvsokolskaya@mail.ru
Sanzhayeva Rimma D.Buryat state universityrimmasan24@mail.ru
Monsonova Aryuna R.Buryat state universitymonsonova@rambler.ru
Dagbaeva Soelma B.Trans-baikal State Universitysoela@bk.ru
Neyaskina Yulia Y.Kamchatka State Universityneyaskinaju@yandex.ru
Kadyrov Ruslan V.Pacific Medical Universityrusl-kad@yandex.ru
Kapustina Tatyana V.Pacific Medical Universitytatunchik48@mail.ru
Всего: 12

References

Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005. 344 p.
Глотов М.Б. Поколение как категория социологии. М. : Логос, 2011. 327 с.
Noble S.M., Schewe C.D. Cohort segmentation: an exploration of its validity // Journal of Business Research. 2003. V. 56 (12). P. 979-987. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00268-0
Twenge J.M., Campbell S.M. Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace // IEEE Engineering Management Review. V. 39 (2). Р. 72-84. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2011.5876178
Пищик В.И., Сиврикова Н.В. Динамика смысловых составляющих ментальности поколений // Российский психологический журнал. 2014. № 11 (3). С. 73-82. URL: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2014.3.7
Howe N., Strauss W. The Next 20 Years: How Customer and Workforce Attitudes Will Evolve // Harvard Business Review. 2007. V. 85 (7-8). P. 47-52. PMID: 17642125
Голубинская А.В. К вопросу о поколенной модели Хоува-Штрауса // Междуна родный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2016. № 1, т. 2. С. 98-101.
Левада Ю.А. Поколения ХХ века: возможности исследования // Мониторинг общест венного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2001. № 5 (55). С. 7-14.
Шиндряева И.В. Профессиональные ценностные ориентации молодежи в контексте поколенческой теории // Вестник Поволжского института управления. 2015. № 6 (51). С. 144-148.
Воронцова Ю., Ермолаев В.В. Представления «поколения Z» о своей будущей семье (на примере литовских старшеклассников) // Психолог. 2016. № 1. С. 1-12. URL: https://doi.Org/10.7256/2409-8701.2016.1.16664
Кулакова А.Б. Поколение Z: теоретический аспект // Вопросы территориального развития. 2018. № 2 (42). DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2018.2.42.6.
Иванов М.С., Яницкий М.С. Мобильность как стратегия обеспечения личной безопасности в представлениях молодежи «поколения Z» // Цифровое кочевничество как глобальный и сибирский тренд : сборник материалов III Междунар. трансдисциплинарной науч.-практ. WEB-конференции. Томск, 2017. С. 125-133.
Ivanov M.S., Seryy A.V., Yanitskiy M.S. Mobility As Strategy Of Providing Personal Security In Postmodern Society // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2018. V. 35. P. 1187-1196. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.140
Воскресенский А.А., Рабош В.А., Сунягина А.Г. Постматериальные ценности поколения Z на пути к обществу знаний - к постановке проблемы // Общество. Среда. Развитие. 2018. № 1. С. 84-87.
Мохова С.Ю. Иерархия в системе жизненных целей у представителей X, Y и Z-поколений // Мир науки. 2017. Т. 5, № 2. URL: http://mir-nauki.com/PDF/69PS MN217.pdf
Данилов А.Н., Грищенко Ж.М., Щелкова Т.В. Поколение Z: раскол традиций или перекодировка культуры // Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Социология. 2017. № 1. С. 109-118.
Yanitskiy M., Seryy A., Braun O. The characteristics of hierarchy of self-image components depending on social and cultural affiliation // KnE Life Sciences. 2018. № 4 (8). Р. 921-933. URL: https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i8.3349
Карандашев В.Н. Методика Шварца для изучения ценностей личности : концепция и методическое руководство. СПб. : Речь, 2004. 70 с.
Шварц Ш. Культурные ценностные ориентации: природа и следствия национальных различий // Психология. 2008. № 2, т. 5. C. 37-67.
Schwartz S.H., Cieciuch J., Vecchione M., Torres C., Dirilen-Gumus O., Butenko T. Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2017. № 47 (3). Р. 241-258. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2228.
 The Value Orientations System of Generation Z: Social, Cultural and Demographic Determinants | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2019. № 72. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/3

The Value Orientations System of Generation Z: Social, Cultural and Demographic Determinants | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2019. № 72. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/3

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1087