Impulsivity Control at Preschool Children
The research is carried out within the framework of the system-subject approach, and we consider the behavioral control as a regulative function of the subject. Since this approach links the processes of self-regulation with the emergence of subjectivity, and the concept of the subject implies, first of all, the individuality and activity of the person himself, the problem of the behavioral control's individual characteristics and their resources is emerged. Usually the studies of self-regulation in childhood pay more attention to age-related changes, and the individual development trajectories, the typology of self-regulation development is much less likely to fall into the focus of attention of researchers. The purpose of our study is to search for possible individual developmental trajectories of behavioral control at preschool age. The individual differences in the control of actions were of great interest for us. According to our assumptions in preschool age control of actions evolves into an arbitrary control and then into volitional control. We engaged 50 children to participate in our study. We used the following techniques to study behavioral control. 1) Cognitive control - the subtest "Vocabulary" and the verbal mental age calculated on its basis, as well as the subtest "Block design" and the non-verbal mental age calculated on its basis (WPPSI). 2) Control of actions - a series of tasks from the motor scale of the BSID-2 and the Ozeretsky scale (for 3- and 4-year-old children); tasks from the Ozeretsky scale and from the battery of neuropsychological examination by A.R. Luria (for 5-year-old children), as well as Day-Night task and gift delay task (all ages). 3) Emotional control - a test of childhood anxiety by Temml R., Dorca M. and Amen V. Children differed in control of actions, (namely, in impulse control) also were differed in other components of behavioral control. Also the interrelations among behavioral control's components had differences in these groups, especially in 4-year-old children. Impulsive children at the age of 4 and 5 years had a stronger relationship of the components of behavioral control than non-impulsive children. We assume that, it could be a consequence of the general lack of behavioral control; or the ability to impulsivity control is basic for behavioral control, and its lack influences on development of all components of behavioral control. Behavioral control in preschool age is a dynamic structure, where a control of actions plays a key role. It provides the development of arbitrariness and control of impulsivity, and its resource base changes with the age.
Keywords
контроль поведения,
контроль действий,
контроль импульсивности,
произвольность,
дошкольники,
когнитивный контроль,
эмоциональный контроль,
индивидуальные различия,
behavioral control,
control of actions,
impulsivity control,
freewill,
preschoolers,
cognitive control,
emotional control,
individual differencesAuthors
Vilenskaya Galina A. | Institute of Psychology of RAS | vga2001@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Сергиенко Е.А., Виленская Г.А., Ковалева Ю.В. Контроль поведения как субъектная регуляция. М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2010.
Montroy J.J., Bowles R.P., Skibbe L.E., McClelland M.M., Morrison F.J. The development of self-regulation across early childhood // Dev Psychol. 2016. V. 52 (11). P. 1744-1762. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000159.
Friedman N.P., Miyake A., Robinson J.L., Hewitt J.K. Developmental trajectories in toddlers' self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: a behavioral genetic analysis // Dev. Psychol. 2011. V. 47 (5). P. 1410-1430. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000159.
Вантеева Е.В. Контроль поведения у детей дошкольного возраста в период адаптации к детскому саду // Психологические исследования. 2013. Т. 6, № 27. С. 9. URL: http://psystudy.ru (дата обращения: 20.12.2018).
Мачинская Р.И., Крупская Е.В. Созревание регуляторных структур мозга и организа ция внимания у детей младшего школьного возраста // Когнитивные исследования : сб. науч. трудов / под ред. В.Д. Соловьева, Т.В. Черниговской. М. : Изд-во Ин-та психологии РАН, 2008. Вып. 2. С. 32-48.
Kamkar N.H. Morton J.B. CanDiD: a framework for linking executive function and educa tion // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. V. 8. Article 1187. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01187.
Виленская Г.А., Лебедева Е.И. Развитие понимания ментального мира и контроля поведения в дошкольном возрасте // Психологические исследования. 2014. Т. 7, № 38. С. 5. URL: http://psystudy.ru (дата обращения: 07.12.2018).
Виленская Г.А. Контроль поведения у дошкольников с нарушениями речи и ресурсы его формирования // Ментальные ресурсы личности: теоретические и прикладные исследования : материалы третьего междунар. симпозиума / отв. ред. М.А. Холодная, Г.В. Ожиганова. М., 2016. С. 56-61.
Смирнова Е.О. К проблеме воли и произвольности в культурно-исторической психо логии // Культурно-историческая психология, 2015. T. 11, № 3. C. 9-15
Сергиенко Е.А. Системно-субъектный подход: обоснование и перспектива // Психологический журнал. 2011. T. 32, № 1. C. 120-132.
De Luca C.R., Leventer R.J. Developmental trajectories of executive functions across the lifespan // Anderson P., Anderson V., Jacobs R. Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a lifespan perspective. Washington, DC : Taylor & Francis. 2008. P. 24-47. DOI: 10.4324/9780203837863.
Rothbart M.K. Temperament and the pursuit of an integrated developmental psychology // Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2004. V. 50 (4). P. 492-505. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00505.x.
Колмагорова А.В., Слободская Е.Р., Гартштейн М.Э. Адаптация русскоязычной версии опросника для изучения темперамента детей раннего возраста // Психологический журнал. 2008. Т. 29, № 6. C. 82-97.
Ильина М.Н. Психологическая оценка интеллекта у детей. СПб. : Питер, 2006.
Практикум по возрастной психологии / под ред. Л.А. Головей, Е.Ф. Рыбалко. СПб. : Речь, 2001.
Ахутина Т.В. Методы нейропсихологической оценки детей в возрасте 6-9 лет. М. : В. Секачев, 2016.
Gerstadt C.L., Hong Y.J., Diamond A. The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1/2-7 years old on a stroop-like day-night test // Cognition. 1994. V. 53 (2). P. 129-153. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X.
Kochanska G., Murray K., Coy K.C. Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood: From toddler to early school age // Child Development. 1997. V. 68. P. 263277. DOI: 10.2307/1131849.
Бурменская Г.В. Методика «Нарисуй человека» // Психолог в детском саду. 1999. № 2. C. 10-27.
Jahromi L.B., Stifter C.A. Individual differences in preschoolers' self-regulation and theory of mind // Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2008. V. 54, № l. P. 125-150. DOI: 10.1353/mpq.2008.0007.
Carlson S.M., Moses L.J. Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind // Child Development. 2001. № 72. P. 1032-1053. DOI: 10.1111/14678624.00333.
Fernandes V.R., Ribeiro M.L.S., Melo T., deTarso Maciel-Pinheiro P., Guimaraes T.T., Araujo N.B., Ribeiro S., Deslandes A.C. Motor coordination correlates with academic achievement and cognitive function in children // Front. Psychol. 2016. V. 7. P. 318. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00318.
Campbell D.W., Eaton W.O., Mckeen N.A. Motor activity level and behavioural control in young children // International Journal оf Behavioral Development. 2002. V. 26, № 4. P. 289-296. DOI: 10.1080/01650250143000166.