Diagnostics of Authentic and Compensatory Self-Esteem Contingencies in Adolescents | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2019. № 72. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/8

Diagnostics of Authentic and Compensatory Self-Esteem Contingencies in Adolescents

The article presents the results of a new scale development. This scale is aimed to measure the four contingencies of adolescent's self-esteem: self-esteem based on competence, self-esteem based on parental approval, self-esteem based on teachers' approval and compensatory self-esteem. The theoretical basis of the questionnaire is the activity theory (A.N. Leontiev) and J. Crocker's idea about two types of self-esteem, based on competence and on the others' approval. The reliability and validity of the new questionnaire was shown with the sample of adolescents (N = 223). The four-factor structure of the questionnaire was confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis. All subscales of the questionnaire demonstrated good reliability and small to moderate correlations with general self-esteem (M. Rosenberg), subjective well-being (satisfaction with oneself, family and school subscales from E. Huebner Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Scale) and academic performance. Adolescents, who based their self-esteem on competence, parents' or teachers' approval, have higher level of general self-esteem, e.g. they perceive themselves as valuable and competent human beings and have higher life satisfaction. On the contrary, compensatory self-esteem correlates negatively with life satisfaction and does not show significant links with general self-esteem. We observed a similar pattern in relation to the correlation between the adolescents' four types of self-esteem contingencies and academic performance. The first three types of self-esteem correlate positively with academic achievement, whereas the compensatory self-esteem correlates negatively. We can argue that the first three types of self-esteem contingencies associated with the competence and constructive approval of significant adults are authentic because they contribute to both subjective well-being and successful results of learning activity and are based on competence and mastery. It's worth noting that the self-esteem based on competence has the most productive effects. It confirms the thesis about the unique role of the productive activity in general and in particular the impact of the productive learning activities for adolescents' personality development. The engagement in learning activity may provide an important sense of competence and mastery, necessary for personality development. On the contrary, high compensatory self-esteem is a negative factor for personality development, both in terms of life satisfaction and academic success. The profile with high level of compensatory self-esteem and low levels of three other types of self-esteem contingencies has especially negative consequences. The article presents the text of the questionnaire and the normative data for adolescents including gender differences. The questionnaire is recommended to use both for research purposes and in practical psychological diagnostics of self-esteem contingencies and healthy personality development.

Download file
Counter downloads: 213

Keywords

самоуважение, основания самоуважения, аутентичное самоуважение, компенсаторное самоуважение, подростки, диагностика, благополучие, self-esteem, self-esteem contingencies, authentic self-esteem, compensatory self-esteem, adolescents, questionnaire, well-being

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Lunkina Maria V.Lomonosov Moscow State Universitymarusamendelevich@gmail.ru
Gordeeva Tamara O.Lomonosov Moscow State Universitytamgordeeva@gmail.com
Всего: 2

References

White R. Ego and reality in psychoanalytic theory: A proposal regarding independent ego energies // Psychological Issues. 1963. V. 3. P. 125-150.
Роджерс К. Взгляд на психотерапию. Становление человека. М. : Прогресс ; Универс, 1994.
Маслоу А. Мотивация и личность. СПб. : Евразия, 1999.
Sheldon K.M., Elliot A.J., Kim Y., Kasser T. What Is Satisfying About Satisfying Events? Testing 10 Candidate Psychological Needs // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. V. 80, № 2. Р. 325-339. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.2.32.
Mruk C. Self-Esteem: research, theory, and practice. New York : Springer, 2006.
O'Brien E.J., Epstein, S. MSEI: The multidimensional self-esteem inventory. Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources, 1988.
Heatherton T.F., Polivy J. Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring State Self-Esteem // Journal or Personality and Social Psychology. 1991. V. 60, № 6. Р. 895910. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895.
Paradise A.W., Kernis M.H. Development of the Contingent Self-esteem Scale. University of Georgia, 1999.
Crocker J., Wolfe C. Contingencies of Self-Worth // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2001. V. 108 (3). P. 593-623. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.593.
Молчанова О.Н., Некрасова Т.Ю. Адаптация методики Дж. Крокер, направленной на исследование базовых оснований самооценки // Культурно-историческая психология. 2013. № 4. С. 65-74. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2017-14-4:10.17759/chp.2015110402.
Huang C. Mean-level change in self-esteem from childhoodthrough adulthood: meta-analysis of longitudinal studies // Review of General Psychology. 2010. V. 14. P. 251260. DOI: 10.1037/a0020543.
Pyszczynski Т., Greenberg J., Solomon S., Arndt J. Why Do People Need Self-Esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review // Psychological Bulletin. 2004. V. 130, № 3. Р. 435-468. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435.
Schimmack U., Diener E. Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being // Journal of Research in Personality. 2003. V 37. P. 100-106. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00532-9.
Sowislo J.F., Orth U. Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies // Psychological Bulletin. 2013. V. 139. Р. 213-240. DOI: 10.1037/a0028931.
Baumeister R.F., Campbell J.D., Krueger J.I., Vohs K.D. Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? // Psychological science in public interest. 2003. V. 4, № 1. P. 1-44. DOI: 10.1111/1529-1006.01431.
Молчанова О.Н. Самооценка. Теоретические проблемы и эмпирические исследования : учеб. пособие. М. : Флинта Наука, 2010.
Kernis M.H. Optimal self-esteem and authenticity: Separating fantasy from reality // Psychological Inquiry. 2003. V. 14 (1). P. 83-89. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_03.
Kernis М.Н., Grannemann B.D., Barclay L.C. Stability and Level of Self-Esteem as Predictors of Anger Arousal and Hostility // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989. № 6. Р. 1013-1022. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00923.x.
Бодалев А.А., Столин В.В. Общая психодиагностика. СПб. : Речь, 2006.
Сычев О.А., Гордеева Т.О., Лункина М.В., Осин Е.Н., Сиднева А.Н. Многомерная шкала удовлетворенности жизнью школьников // Психологическая наука и образование. 2018. Т. 23, № 6. С. 5-15. DOI: 10.17759/pse. 2018230601.
Леонтьев А.Н. Деятельность. Сознание. Личность. М. : Academia, 2005.
Meece J.L., Glienke B.B., Burg S. Gender and motivation // Journal of School Psychology. 2006. V. 44. P. 351-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.
Kling K.C., Hyde J.S., Showers C.J., Buswell B.N. Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis // Psychological Bulletin. 1999. V. 125 (4). Р. 470-500. DOI: 10.1037/00332909.125.4.470.
Gomez-Baya D., Mendoza R., Paino S. Emotional basis of gender differences in adolescent self-esteem // Revista Psycologia. 2016. V. 30 (2). P. 1-14. DOI: 10.17575/rpsicol. v30i2.1105.
 Diagnostics of Authentic and Compensatory Self-Esteem Contingencies in Adolescents | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2019. № 72. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/8

Diagnostics of Authentic and Compensatory Self-Esteem Contingencies in Adolescents | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2019. № 72. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1087