Individual Mental Representations of Loyalty Development Dynamics
The article is devoted to the dynamic aspect of loyalty as psycho-behavioral participation of an individual in his group. The results of this study empirically verified differences in the mental representation of loyalty between individuals with different levels of loyalty development. Furthermore this study attempted to identify mental constructs, operated at different levels of loyalty in its mental representation. To investigate the relationship between the loyalty level and mental constructs, operated in its mental representation, we measured a contingency between responses to stimuli, representing a number of mental constructs theoretically associated with loyalty, and reactions to stimuli, denoting the eleven different loyalty groups of employees of Russian penitentiary system (N = 2786). Identified common trends in the development of mental representations of loyalty, in particular, the dynamics of its main components, theoretically allocated according to the results of the literature analysis. The congruence of loyalty group and of "I" in mental representation arises at the early stages of loyalty formation and is one of the basic characteristics of the loyalty phenomenon. Positive sentiment of loyalty group and satisfaction with it qualitatively grow in the mental representation of loyalty as it develops. Already at the initial level of loyalty there is a feeling of "security" in the group - the first positive emotion that is associated with the group in the mental representation of loyalty. Then a positive assessment of the group partners and relationships with them is formed. Last at the initial level of loyalty arises the feelings of "joy" and "novelty" of the group. When moving to the level of a well-developed loyalty, it begins to be associated with a sense of "inner peace". The components of the motivational significance of a loyalty group arise in its representation not simultaneously. At the lower levels of loyalty to a group, it begins to be associated with "activity", "self-realization", and "self-affirmation". The reflexive component of motivation of group loyal members arises in the mental representation later, when loyalty is already well-developed. Described qualitative changes are the most typical, regardless of the type of loyalty group, at least in the eleven test loyalty groups studied. At the same time, loyalty representations also have many specific features in the dynamics of their structural complication in various groups. The results of this study can help to clarify the essence of the loyalty phenomenon and to improve the ways of its psychological assessment and correction.
Keywords
лояльность,
самоидентификация,
мотивационная значимость,
удовлетворенность,
психическая репрезентация,
причастность к группе,
интегрирован-ность с группой,
личностно-групповые взаимоотношения,
loyalty,
self-identification,
motivational significance,
satisfaction,
mental representation,
group participation,
integration with the group,
personality-group relationshipAuthors
| Gornostaev Stanislav V. | Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia | stanislavrz@yandex.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Глазков А.В. Взаимосвязь организационной лояльности и когнитивного стиля «импульсивность-рефлективность» // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2012. № 46. С. 33-38.
Прохоров А.О. Ментальные репрезентации психических состояний: феноменологи ческие и экспериментальные характеристики // Экспериментальная психология. 2016. Т. 9, № 2. С. 23-37. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2016090203.
Royce J. The Philosophy of Loyalty. Norwood : Norwood Press, J.S. Cushing Co, Berwick & Smith Co., 1914. 409 p.
Singer E.A. Love and loyalty // The philosophical review. 1916. Vol. 25, № 3. P. 456-465. DOI: 10.2307/2178275.
Rogers A.K. The Philosophy of Loyalty // The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods. 1918. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 9-22.
Grodzins M. The loyal and the disloyal: social boundaries of patriotism and treason. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1956. 319 p.
Fletcher T.W. The Nature of Administrative Loyalty // Public Administration Review. 1958. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 37-42.
Fletcher G.P. Loyalty: an essay on the morality of relationships. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1993. 224 p.
Newson M., Buhrmester M., Whitehouse H. Explaining Lifelong Loyalty: the Role of Identity Fusion and Self-Shaping Group Events // PLoS one. 2016. № 11 (8): P. 1-13. DOI: 10.1371 /journal.pone.0160427.
Van Vugt M., Hart C.M. Social identity as social glue: the origins of group loyalty // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. № 86. P. 585-598.
Weatherly U.G. Multiple groupings and loyalty patterns // American journal of sociology. 1934. № 40 (2). P. 204-213.
Merriam Ch.E. Some Aspects of Loyalty // Public Administration Review. 1948. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 81-84.
Hirschman A. Exit, voice, and loyalty: response to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1970. 176 p.
Wynne L.C. The study of intrafamilial alignments and splits in exploratory family therapy // Exploring the Base for Family Therapy / ed. by N.W. Ackerman, F. Beatman, S.N. Sherman. New York : Family Service Association of America, 1961. P. 95-115.
Boszormenyi-Nagy I., Spark G. Invisible loyalties: reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. Hagerstown : Harper & Row, 1973. xxi, 409 p.
Парсонс Т. Система современных обществ / пер. с англ. Л.А. Седова, А. Д. Ковалева; под ред. М.С. Ковалевой. М. : Аспект Пресс, 1998. 270 с.
Hart D., Thompson J. Untangling Employee Loyalty: A Psychological Contract Perspective // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2007. № 17 (2). P. 297-323. DOI: 10.5840/beq200717233.
Keller S. The limits of loyalty. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007. 232 p.
Connor J. The Sociology of Loyalty New York : Springer Science Business Media, LLC, 2007. 161 р.
Curran J.M., Healy B.C. The Loyalty Continuum: Differentiating Between Stages of Loyalty Development // Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2014. № 22 (4). P. 367-384. DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679220402.
Соломин И.Л., Чернышкова М.П., Суворина Н.Ю. Использование методики цветовых метафор И.Л. Соломина в практике психологов уголовно-исполнительной системы. СПб., 2012. 69 с.
Горностаев С.В. Методика цветовых метафор как средство диагностики служебной лояльности // Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах. 2017. № 3 (70). С. 67-72.
Cole G.D.H. Loyalties // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series. 1925-1926. Vol. 26. P. 151-170.
Соломин И.Л. О «цветовых метафорах» и не только о них // Психологическая газета. 2001. № 2. С. 16-19.
Бреслав Г.М. Композиционная теория эмоций: к пониманию моральных эмоций и любви // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2015. № 12 (4). С. 81-102.
Магун В.С., Руднев М.Г. Базовые ценности россиян в европейском контексте (статья первая) // Общественные науки и современность. 2010. № 3. С. 5-22.
Горностаев С.В. Основы психологической теории лояльности. Рязань, 2017. 224 с.
Arvidson M., Axelsson J. Exploring self-loyalty in the context of social acceleration: theorising loyalties as emotions and resistance // Journal of Political Power. 2017. Vol. 10 (2). P. 133-148. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2017.1335835.
Thakur A., Kaur R. Relationship between self-concept and attitudinal brand loyalty in luxury fashion purchase: a study of selected global brands on the Indian market // Management : Journal of Contemporary Management Issues. 2015. Vol. 20 (2). P. 163-180.
Si S., Li Y. Human resource management practices on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: organizational commitment as a mediator // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2012. Vol. 23(8). P. 1705-1716. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.580099.
Beer A., Watson D. The Individual and Group Loyalty Scales (IGLS): Construction and Preliminary Validation // Journal of Personality Assessment. 2009. Vol. 91 (3). P. 277287. DOI: 10.1080/00223890902794341.
Curran J.M., Varki S., Rosen D.E. Loyalty and Its Antecedents: are the Relationships Static? // Journal of Relationship Marketing. 2010. Vol. 9 (4). P. 179-199. DOI: 10.1080/15332667.2010.522469.
Lamb M. Loyalty and human rights: liminality and social action in a divided society // The International Journal of Human Rights. 2010. Vol. 14 (6). 994-1012. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2010.512144.
Kot-Radojewska M., Timenko I.V. Employee loyalty to the organization in the context of the form of employment // Oeconomia Copernicana. 2018. Vol. 9 (3). P. 511-527. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2018.026.
Shen Y.-Ch. et al. Virtual Community Loyalty: An Interpersonal-Interaction Perspective // International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2010. Vol. 15 (1). P. 49-74. DOI: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415150102.
Tanford S., Montgomery R., Nelson K.B. Factors that Influence Attendance, Satisfaction, and Loyalty for Conventions // Journal of Convention & Event Tourism. 2012. Vol. 13 (4). P. 290-318. DOI: 10.1080/15470148.2012.728975.
Ineson E.M, Berechet G. Employee Loyalty in Hotels: Romanian Experiences // Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism. 2011. Vol. 10 (2). P. 129-149. DOI: 10.1080/15332845.2011.536694.
Ong Ch.H., Lee H.W, Ramayah T. Impact of brand experience on loyalty // Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 2018. Vol. 27 (7). P. 755-774. DOI: 10.1080/19368623.2018.1445055.
Lin Ch.-P. Learning Virtual Community Loyalty Behavior From a Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory // International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2010. Vol. 26 (4). P. 345-360. DOI: 10.1080/10447310903575481.
Математический энциклопедический словарь / гл. ред. Ю.В. Прохоров. М. : Сов. энциклопедия, 1988. 847 с.
Ивченко Г.И., Медведев Ю.И. Математическая статистика. М. : Высшая школа, 1984. 248 с.
Купцов М.И., Филипова Е.Е., Слободская И.Н., Павлова С.А., Корячко А.В., Жарких А.А. Математические методы в психологии. М., 2017. 154 с.
Ермолаев О.Ю. Математическая статистика для психологов. 5-е изд. М., 2011. 336 с.
Schultz B., Sheffer МХ. The mascot that wouldn't die: a case study of fan identification and mascot loyalty // Sport in Society. 2018. Vol. 21 (3). P. 482-496. DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2017.1346622.
