Strategic Approach to Coping Scale: Psychometric Characteristics of the Russian Version of Technique
Coping strategies are an important factor for a human psychological well-being reconstruction. Theoretical literature analysis revealed that the identified coping mechanisms are relatively few comparing to the number of publications about their measurement. At the same time, in Russian psychology there is no adequate toolkit for measuring the coping behavior and human individual resources. In this regard, it is very important to adapt, validate already existing and well-established foreign methods. The aim of the study is to evaluate the psychometric indices of the Strategic Approach to Coping Scale (SACS) by S.E. Hobfoll. The key assumption was that the Russian-language version of the SACS method has psychometric characteristics, external and internal validity sufficient for its use in a multicultural sample of young people studying at Russian universities. In accordance with the hypothesis presented, the methodology and logic of the study were formulated, and four stages of the study were defined. External validity was tested in the first stage using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The internal validity assessment was carried out in the second phase, which resulted in the adjustment of test standards to the gender of the respondents. Construct validity was tested during the third and fourth stages of the study, when establishing the relationship of the scale of the methodology with the regulatory-personal predictors. The results of the study showed the relative internal consistency of the Russian version of the methodology scale, the methodology requires further adjustment. The scales’ rates have been established taking into account the multicultural and gender characteristics of the sample. The representativeness of the sample presented makes the resulting norms more correct in assessing the significance of the overcoming behavior strategy. Validity verification of the questionnaire allows speaking about the discrepancy between the received factor structure of the methodology and its author's model. To overcome these discrepancies, some questionnaire items need to be reformulated. The Russian-language version of the technique has good construct validity. The test is capable to measure overcoming behavior strategies. Coping strategies are predictably associated with the level of conscious self-regulation scales (planning, programming, flexibility, evaluation of results) and socially significant personal dispositions (to be close to others, to help them, to empathize and to rejoice in successes, to be conscientious, responsible, and cautious in work). In general, the results of the evaluation of psychometric indices of the SACS methodology showed acceptable internal consistency of the scales of the Russian-language version of the methodology, confirmed structural validity, refined test norms, which allows us talking about the possibilities of using this technique in psychological studies.
Keywords
методика SACS,
копинг-стратегии,
осознанная саморегуляция,
студенты,
психометрические характеристики,
механизмы совладания,
внешняя валидность,
внутренняя валидность,
конструктная валидность,
регуляторно-личностные предикторы,
SACS methodology,
coping strategies,
conscious self-regulation,
students,
psychometric characteristics,
coping mechanisms,
external validity,
internal validity,
construct validity,
regulatory and personal predictorsAuthors
Banshchikova Tatyana N. | North-Caucasus Federal University | sevkav@mail.ru |
Sokolovskij Maksim L. | North-Caucasus Federal University | msokolovskii@ncfu.ru |
Morosanova Varvara I. | Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education | morosanova@mail.ru |
Всего: 3
References
Банщикова Т.Н., Соколовский М.Л. Особенности взаимосвязи показателей осознан ной саморегуляции и параметров совладающего поведения у российских и зарубежных студентов в условиях аккультурации // Образование личности. 2017. № 4. С. 114-121.
Folkman S., Lazarus R.S. The relationship between coping and emotion: Implications for theory and research // Social Science Medicine, 1988. Vol. 26. P. 309-317, DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90395-4.
Folkman S., Lazarus R. Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press, 1988. 33 p.
Вассерман Л.И., Иовлев Б.В., Исаева Е.Р., Трифонова Е.А., Щелкова Д.Ю. и др. Ме тодика для психологической диагностики способов совладания со стрессом и проблемными для личности ситуациями : пособие для врачей и медицинских психологов. СПб. : Изд-во НИПНИ им. В.М. Бехтерева, 2009. 40 с.
Водопьянова Н.Е., Старченкова Е.С. Стратегии и модели преодолевающего поведе ния // Практикум по психологии менеджмента и профессиональной деятельности. СПб. : Речь, 2003. С. 311-321.
Рассказова Е.И., Гордеева Т.О., Осин Е.Н. Копинг-стратегии в структуре деятельно сти и саморегуляции: психометрические характеристики и возможности применения методики COPE // Психология. Журнал высшей школы экономики. 2013. Т. 10, № 1. С. 82-118.
Brown T. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York ; London : The Guilford Press, 2006. 462 p.
Carver C. S. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE // International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1997. № 4. P. 92-100. DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Weintraub J. K. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach // J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989. Vol. 56, № 2. P. 267283. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267.
Gonsalves T., Lemos M.S., Canario C. Adaptation and validation of a Measure of students’ adaptive and maladaptive ways of coping with academic problems // Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2019. Vol. 37, № 6. P. 782-796. DOI: 10.1177/0734282918799389.
Skinner E.A., Zimmer-Gembeck M.J. The Development of Coping: Stress, Neurophysiology, Social Relationships, and Resilience During Childhood and Adolescence. Springer International Publishing, 2016. 336 p.
Al-Smadi A.M. et al. Predictors of Coping Strategies Employed by Iraqi Refugees in Jordan // Clinical Nursing Research. 2017. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 592-607. DOI: 10.1177/1054773816664915.
Alzoubi F.A., Al-Smadi A.M., Gougazeh Y.M. Coping Strategies Used by Syrian Refugees in Jordan // Clinical Nursing Research. 2017. P. 1-26. DOI: 10.1177/1054773817749724.
Zimmer-Gembeck M.J. et al. Is parent-child attachment a correlate of children’s emotion regulation and coping? : review // International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2016. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 74-93. DOI: 10.1177/0165025415618276.
Modecki K.L., Zimmer-Gembeck M.J., Guerra N. Emotion Regulation, Coping, and Decision Making: Three Linked Skills for Preventing Externalizing Problems in Adolescence // Child Development. 2017. Vol. 88, № 2. P. 417-426. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12734.
Абабков В.А., Перре М., Планшерел Б. Систематическое исследование семейного стресса и копинга // Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии имени В.М. Бехтерева. СПб. : ПНИ им. В.М. Бехтерева, 1998. № 2. С. 4-8.
Skinner E.A., Pitzer J.R., Steele J.S. Can student engagement serve as a motivational resource for academic coping, persistence, and learning during late elementary and early middle school? // Developmental Psychology. 2016. Vol. 52, № 12. P. 2099-2117. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000232.
Леонтьев Д.А., Александрова Л.А., Лебедева А.А. Специфика ресурсов и механизмов психологической устойчивости студентов с ОВЗ в условиях инклюзивного образования // Психологическая наука и образование. 2011. Т. 16, № 3. С. 80-94. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu/2011/n3/Leontyev.shtml
Крюкова Т.Л., Куфтяк Е.В. Опросник способов совладания (адаптация методики WCQ) // Журнал практического психолога. 2007. № 3. С. 93-112.
Solomonov V.A., Solomonov D.V., Fomina E.A., Banshchikova T.N. Using neural networks in building a psychological typology // Proceedings of the 2018 Multidisciplinary Symposium on Computer Science and ICT. Stavropol, Russia, October 15, 2018. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2254/10000260.pdf (accessed: 18.02.2020).
Amirkhan J.H. A factor analytically derived measure of coping: the coping strategy indication // J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 1990. Vol. 59, № 5. P. 1066-1074. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1066.
Karaca A. et al. Development and Assessment of a Coping Scale for Infertile Women in Turkey // African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2018. Vol. 22, № 3. P. 13-23.
Clipa O. Teacher Stress and Coping Strategies // 15th edition of the International Conference on Sciences of Education, Studies and Current Trends in Science of Education, ICSED 2017, 9-10 June 2017, Suceava, Romania : LUMEN Proceedings. Р. 120-128. DOI: 10.18662/lumproc.icsed2017.14.
Lo C.-F. Stress and Coping Strategies among University Freshmen in Hong Kong: Validation of the Coping Strategy Indicator // Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8, № 8. P. 1254-1266. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2017.88081.
Togas C., Mavrogiorgi F., Alexias G. Examining the relationship between coping strategies, perceived social support and mental health in psychosocial and environmental problems // Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health. 2018. Vol. 1, № 3. P. 89102. DOI: 10.26386/obrela.v1i3.96.
Heim E. Coping und Adaptivitat: Gibt es geeignetes oder ungeeignetes Coping? // Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie. 1988. Bd. 38, № 1. S. 8-18.
Гаранян Н.Г., Иванов П.А. Апробация опросника копинг-стратегий (COPE) // Психологическая наука и образование. 2010. Т. 15, № 1. С. 82-93. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu/2010/n1/28031.shtml (дата обращения: 18.02.2020).
Hobfoll S.E., Lerman M. Personal relationships, personal attitudes, and stress resistance: mother’s reactions to the child’s illness // American Journal of Community Psychology. 1988. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 565-589. DOI: 10.1007/BF00922772.
Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests // Psychometrika. 1951. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 297-334. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555.
Cho E. Making Reliability Reliable: a Systematic Approach to Reliability Coefficients // Organizational Research Methods. 2016. Vol. 19, № 4. P. 651-682. DOI: 10.1177/1094428116656239.
Hobfoll S.E. et al. Gender and coping: the dual-axis model of coping // American Journal of Community Psychology. 1994. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 49-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF02506817.
Моросанова В.И. Опросник «Стиль саморегуляции поведения» (ССПМ) : руководство. М. : Когито-Центр, 2004. 44 с.
Сергеева А.С., Кириллов Б.А., Джумагулова А.Ф. Перевод и адаптация краткого пятифакторного опросника личности (TIPI-RU): оценка конвергентной валидности, внутренней согласованности и тест-ретестовой надежности // Экспериментальная психология. 2016. Т. 9, № 3. С. 138-154. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2016090311.
Хромов А.Б. Пятифакторный опросник личности : учеб.-метод. пособие. Курган : Изд-во Курган. гос. ун-та, 2000. 23 с.
Pearson K. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 1895. Vol. 58. P. 240-242. DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1895.0041