Psychological Profile of Machiavellians in the Study of the Symptom Complex of Manipulative Behavior Victims | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2020. № 78. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/78/1

Psychological Profile of Machiavellians in the Study of the Symptom Complex of Manipulative Behavior Victims

Fraud is widespread and every day it is more and more creative. Machiavellianism is of great interest for the symptom complex of fraud victims and resistance to manipulative behavior. The authors studied the psychological profile of the low and high machiavellians. The first hypothesis was that low machiavellians have different level of hostility, development of such traits as Consent and Conscientiousness, moral identity, anti-social creativity, and thinking styles, than high machiavellians. The second hypothesis said that machiavellians of different levels have different values. According to the hypothesis, low machiavellians value social focus, while high machiavellians value personal focus. The sample consisted of 150 students (the average age was 18.8 ±1.50). We used the following adapted questionnaires: aggression (A. Bass, M.Perry), "NEO-FFI" of the questionnaire "NEO PI-R" (P. Costa, R. MacRae), "Mac-IV", behavioral features of malevolent creativity (N. Hao et al.), PVQ-R (Sh. Schwartz), CTI (Epstein). The questionnaire By K. Aquina and A. Reed II (2002) was used to diagnose the moral identity. Low machiavellians have significantly higher (according to the Mann-Whitney criterion) Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, moral identity, higher values of Social focus, General Scale of Constructive Thinking, Naive optimism and significantly lower anti-social creativity, higher values of Personal focus, Categorical thinking, hostility. Naive optimism significantly positively correlated with the values of Achievement, Security - personal, Security - Public, interpersonal Conformity, Universalism concern for nature, Benevolence as the sense of duty". According to regression analysis, the predictors of Naive optimism were the values Security - personal and Security - public. We have compiled a psychological profile of young people with low values of Machiavellianism. It includes such features as the importance of moral identity, low hostility, control of one's own impulses, cooperation with other people, consideration of the interests of others, overcoming personal interests for the sake of the interests of others, self-restraint and order. They will not use their own creativity to harm other people; they are able to adapt their way of thinking to the requirements of the situation. The peculiarity of low machiavellians is a high naive optimism, that is situational, and combined with the significance of the values of personal and public security. Naive optimism can manifest itself in situations where somebody can offer something that is meaningful to a person with a naive optimism mindset. In such situations, it is possible to use unconstructive strategies, and be unable to recognize the threat. The listed set of characteristics creates a risk of being manipulated by fraudsters. The results show that thinking styles, values, and levels of self-control are important for the study of manipulative behavior victims and the study of resistance to such behavior in people of different age.

Download file
Counter downloads: 114

Keywords

psychological profile of machiavellians, Machiavellianism, resistance to manipulative behavior, fraud, manipulative behavior

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Meshkova Natalya V.Moscow State University of Psychology & Educationmeshkovanv@yandex.ru
Enikolopov Sergey N.Mental Health Research Centreenikolopov@mail.ru
Kravtsov Oleg G.Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of the Interior of Russiakravtsovog@gmail.com
Всего: 3

References

Пудовкин А.А. Уголовно-правовые и криминологические особенности мошенничества : дис.. канд. юрид. наук. СПб., 2007. 144 с.
Хворост О.А. Жертва мошенничества: характеристики и особенности // Научные проблемы гуманитарных исследований. 2012. № 7. С. 187-193.
Pratt T.C. A self-control/life-course theory of criminal behavior // European Journal of Criminology. 2015. Vol. 13 (1). P.129-146. DOI: 10.1177/147737081558777.
Aquina K., Reed II A. The Self-Importance of Moral Identity // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 83 (6). P. 1423-1440.
Anderson K.B. Who are the victims of identity theft? The effect of demographics // Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 2006. Vol. 25. P. 160-171.
Reisig M.D., Holtfreter K. Shopping fraud victimization among the elderly // Journal of Financial Crime. 2013. Vol. 20 (3). P. 324-337. DOI: 10.1108/JFC-03-2013-0014.
Reisig M.D., Pratt T.C., Holtfreter K. Perceived risk of internet theft victimization: Examining the effects of social vulnerability and impulsivity // Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2006. Vol. 36. P. 369-384. DOI: 10.1177/0093854808329405.
Байрамова Э.Э., Ениколопов С.Н. Адаптация методики определения уровня магического мышления М. Экблада и Л.Дж. Чапмана на русскоязычной выборке // Психиатрия. 2016. № 1. С. 40-46.
Ениколопов С.Н., Лебедев С.В. Адаптация методик исследования посттравматических стрессовых расстройств // Психологическая диагностика. 2004. № 3. С. 19-38.
Шварц Ш., Бутенко Т.П., Седова Д.С., Липатова А.С. Уточненная теория базовых индивидуальных ценностей: применение в России // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2012. Т. 9, № 1. С. 43-70.
Орел В.Е., Сенгин И.Г. Опросник NEO PI R. Ярославль : Психодиагностика, 2004. 33 с.
Ениколопов С.Н., Цибульский Н.П. Психометрический анализ русскоязычной версии опросника диагностики агрессии А. Басса и М. Перри // Психологический журнал. 2007. № 1. С. 115-124.
Baker A., ten Brinke L., Porter S. Will get fooled again: emotionally intelligent people are easily duped by high-stakes deceivers // Legal Criminol. Psychol. 2013. Vol. 18. P. 300313. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02054.x.
Mayer J.D., Roberts R.D., Barsade S.G. Human abilities: Emotional intelligence // Annual Review of Psychology. 2008. Vol. 59. P. 507-536. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59. 103006.093646.
McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. Vol. 52. P. 81-90.
Андронникова О.О. Модели девиктимизации человека с ролевой позицией жертвы в социокультурном пространстве // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015. № 1. URL: https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19793 (дата обращения: 04.06.2020).
Warren G., Schertler E., Bull P. Detecting deception from emotional and unemotional cues // Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour. 2009. Vol. 33. P. 59-69. DOI: 10.1007/s10919-008-005.
Campbell M.A., Porter S. Pinpointing reality: How well can people judge true and mistaken emotional childhood memories? // Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences. 2002. Vol. 34. P. 217-229. DOI: 10.1037/h0087174.
Егоров Д.М. Избирательность восприятия лживых сообщений в зависимости от половой принадлежности // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2018. № 68. С. 4661. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/68/3.
Знаков В.В. Психология понимания: Проблемы и перспективы. М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2005. 448 с.
Peace K.A., Porter S., Almon D.F. Sidetracked by emotion: Observers' ability to discriminate genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegations // Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2012. Vol. 17 (2). P. 322-335. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02013.x.
Знаков В.В. Методика исследования макиавеллизма личности // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2001. № 14-15. С. 122-128.
Бочкова М.Н. Эмоциональный интеллект и креативность: связь и взаимодействие на примере разных категорий осужденных // Психология и право. 2020. Т. 10, № 1. С. 92-102. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2020100108.
Стрижов Е.Ю. Нравственно-психологические детерминанты мошенничества : автореф. дис.. д-ра психол. наук. Тула, 2011. 48 с.
Мешкова Н.В., Дебольский М.Г., Ениколопов С.Н., Масленков А.А. Особенности креативности в социальном взаимодействии у осужденных, совершивших корыстные и агрессивно-насильственные преступления // Психология и право. 2018. Т. 8, № 1. С. 147-163. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080111.
Мешкова Н.В. и др. Возрастные и половые особенности личностных предикторов антисоциальной креативности // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2020. Т. 17, № 1. С. 59-71. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2020-1-60-72.
Мешкова Н.В., Ениколопов С.Н., Митина О.В., Мешков И.А. Адаптация опросника «Поведенческие особенности антисоциальной креативности» // Психологическая наука и образование. 2018. Т. 23, № 6. С. 25-40. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2018230603.
Bacon A.M., Burak H., Rann J. Sex differences in the relationship between sensation seeking, trait emotional intelligence and delinquent behavior // The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2014. Vol. 25, № 6. P. 673-683. DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2014.943796.
Bacon A.M., Regan L. Manipulative relational behaviour and delinquency: sex differences and links with emotional intelligence // The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2016. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 331-348. DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2015.1134625.
Iqbal F. et al. Wordnet-Based Criminal Networks Mining for Cybercrime Investigation // IEEEAccess. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 22740-22755. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891694.
Сафуанов Ф.С., Докучаева Н.В. Особенности личности жертв противоправных пося гательств в Интернете // Психология и право. 2015. Т. 5, № 4. С. 80-93. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2015050407.
Hutchings A. Leaving on a jet plane: the trade in fraudulently obtained airline tickets // Crime Law Soc Change. 2018. Vol. 70. P. 461-487. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-018-9777-8.
Levi M., Doig A., Gundur R. et al. Cyberfraud and the implications for effective risk-based responses: themes from UK research // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2017. Vol. 67 (1). P. 77-96.
Leon K.S., Ken I. Legitimized fraud and the state-corporate criminology of food - a Spec trum-based theory // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 71. P. 25-46. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-018-9787-6.
Allan D.M.C., Kelly A., Stephenson A. The prominence of fraud in New South Wales metropolitan media reporting // Crime, Law and Social Change: an interdisciplinary journal. 2018. Vol. 70 (5). P. 603-619. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-018-9784-9.
 Psychological Profile of Machiavellians in the Study of the Symptom Complex of Manipulative Behavior Victims | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2020. № 78. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/78/1

Psychological Profile of Machiavellians in the Study of the Symptom Complex of Manipulative Behavior Victims | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2020. № 78. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/78/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 208