Mental Self-Regulatory System of Educational Activities: Metacognitive Approach
The study was carried out using the integrative approach, in which the human psyche is considered as a self-organizing system. The goal of this study was to describe in a consistent manner the mental self-regulatory system of educational activities in the context of the metacognitive approach. Our objectives were the following: to determine the impact of gender and age on the indicators of metacognitive awareness in educational activities; to describe the factor structure of the mental self-regulatory system of educational activities including metacognitive awareness. To assess the parameters of the self-regulatory mental activity we used the following methods: The Self-organization of Activity Questionnaire by E. Mandrikova (2010); The differential reflectivity test by D. Leontiev and E. Osin (2014); The Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire by D. Lyusin (2004), short version of the questionnaire "Metacognitive Awareness Inventory" by G. Schraw and R.S. Dennison, adapted by A. Karpov and I. Skityaeva (2005). The study involved 354 respondents, including 257 women and 97 men aged 18 to 45. The study was conducted on the basis of St. Petersburg University (BA students and occupational re-training students). The data was analyzed using means, standard deviations, Student's t-test correlation, and factor analysis. During the study we found out that metacognitive awareness indicators were not associated significantly with the age of the general sample or in male and female groups. The male group was characterized by higher indicators of knowledge about cognition, and the female group was characterized by higher indicators of metacogni-tive regulation "Debugging strategies". We described the factor structure of the mental self-regulatory system of educational activities including metacognitive awareness. There are 4 factors: Metacognitive processes, Reflective processes, Planning and realization, and Operational performance temporal perspective. Our research confirms that metacognitive awareness, emotional intelligence, and purposefulness are the main characteristics in the mental self-regulatory system of educational activities and their development can increase the effectiveness of education. Reflection was at second rank in importance in the mental self-regulatory process. The third and fourth factors are associated with the processes of realization and implementation of self-regulatory activities. Thus, we recommend the teachers to develop students' metacognitive processes, such as metacognitive knowledge and metacog-nitive regulation, interpersonal and intrapersonal emotional intelligence, and purposefulness for optimizing their self-regulatory system.
Keywords
metacognitive approach,
metacognitive awareness,
mental self-regulation,
educational activities,
self-organization of activity,
purposefulness,
emotional intelligence,
reflectionAuthors
| Perikova Ekaterina I. | Saint-Petersburg University | chikurovaei@gmail.com |
| Bysova Valentina M. | Saint-Petersburg University | vbysova@mail.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Efklides A. How does metacognition contribute to the regulation of learning? An integrative approach // Psychological topics. 2014. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 1-30.
Gomes C.M.A., Golino H.F., Menezes I.G. Predicting school achievement rather than in telligence: Does metacognition matter? // Psychology. 2014. Vol. 5. P. 1095-1110. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.59122.
Veenman, M.V.J. Metacognition and individual differences // Handbook of individual differences in reading: Reader, text, and context / ed. by P. Afflerbach. London : Routledge, 2016. P. 26-40.
Vrugt A., Oort F.J. Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement // Metacognition and Learning. 2008. Vol. 3. Р. 123-146. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4.
Zimmerman B.J., Schunk D.H. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (educational psychology handbook). New York ; London : Routledge / Taylor & Francis Group, 2011. 500 p.
Бызова В.М., Перикова Е.И., Ловягина А.Е. Эффективность метакогнитивных стра тегий принятия решений в учебной деятельности // Science for Education Today. 2019. T. 9, № 4. С. 19-35. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.1904.02.
Batteson T.J., Roland T., Timothy D.R. Approaches to learning, metacognition and personali ty; an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 116. P. 2561-2567. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.611.
Dunlosky J., Metcalfe J. Metacognition. Washington DC : Sage Publications, 2009. 344 p.
Моросанова В.И. Развитие теории осознанной саморегуляции: дифференциальный подход // Вопросы психологии. 2011. № 3. С. 106-118.
Сергиенко Е.А., Виленская Г.А. Контроль поведения - интегративное понятие психической регуляции // Разработка понятий современной психологии / отв. ред. А.Л. Журавлев, Е.А. Сергиенко, М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2018. С. 343-378. (Сер. Методология, теория и история психологии).
Леонтьев Д.А. Саморегуляция, ресурсы и личностный потенциал // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2016. № 62. С. 18-37. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/62/3.
Конопкин О.А. Осознанная саморегуляция как критерий субъектности // Вопросы психологии. 2008. № 3. С. 22-34.
Моросанова В.И. Саморегуляция и индивидуальность человека. М. : Наука, 2010. 519 с.
Осницкий А.К. Регуляторный опыт, субъектная активность и самостоятельность человека. Ч. 1 // Психологические исследования : электрон. науч. журнал. 2009. Е 5 (7). URL: http://psystudy.ru/num/2009n5-7/221-osnitsky7 (дата обращения: 29.02.2020).
Дикая Л.Г. Психическая саморегуляция функционального состояния человека (си-стемно-деятельностный подход). М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2003. 318 с.
Прохоров А.О., Чернов А.В. Динамика познавательных состояний студентов с разным уровнем и направленностью рефлексии // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2019. № 74. C. 110-125. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/74/7.
Карпов А.В., Карпов А.А., Маркова Е.В. Психология принятия решений в управленческой деятельности. Метасистемный подход. Ярославль : Изд-во Ярослав. гос. ун-та им. П.Г. Демидова, 2016. 644 с.
Efklides A. Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation // European Psychologist. 2008. Vol. 13. P. 277-287. DOI: 10.1027/10169040.13.4.277.
Efklides A. Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model // Educational Psychologist. 2011. Vol. 46, P. 6-25. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2 011.538645.
Flavell J.H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. 1979. Vol. 34. P. 906-911. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
Чернокова Т.Е. Диалектические структуры в метапознании // Филология и культура. 2013. Т. 33, № 3. С. 322-328.
Schraw G. Promoting general metacognitive awareness // Instructional Science. 1998. Vol. 26. P. 113-125. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003044231033.
Тихонов Р.В., Аммалайнен А.В., Морошкина Н.В. Многообразие метакогнитивных чувств: разные феномены или разные термины? // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология и педагогика. 2018. Т. 8, вып. 3. С. 214-242. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.302.
Schraw G., Dennison R.S. Assessing metacognitive awareness // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994. Vol. 19. Р. 460-475. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
Gutierrez de Blume A.P., Wells P., Davis C., Parker, J. "You Can Sort of Feel It": exploring metacognition and the feeling of knowing among undergraduate students // The Qualitative Report. 2017. Vol. 22, № 7. Р. 2016-2032.
Young A., Fry J.D. Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students // Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2008. Vol. 8, № 2. Р. 1-10.
Шадриков В.Д. Психологический анализ деятельности : системогенетический подход. Ярославль : ЯГПИ, 1979. 554 с.
Мандрикова Е.Ю. Разработка опросника самоорганизации деятельности // Психологическая диагностика. 2010. № 2. С. 87-111.
Леонтьев Д.А., Осин Е.Н. Рефлексия «хорошая» и «дурная»: от объяснительной модели к дифференциальной диагностике // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. Т. 11, № 4. С. 110-135.
Люсин Д.В. Опросник на эмоциональный интеллект ЭмИн: новые психометрические данные // Социальный и эмоциональный интеллект: от моделей к измерениям / под ред. Д.В. Люсина, Д.В. Ушакова. М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2009. С. 264-278.
Карпов А.В., Скитяева И.М. Психология метакогнитивных процессов. М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2005. 352 с.
Бызова В.М., Перикова Е.И., Ловягина А.Е. Метакогнитивная включенность в системе психической саморегуляции студентов // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2019. № 73. С. 126-140. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/73/8.
Limueco J., Prudente M. Predicting progression trends of scientific reasoning skills and metacognitive awareness among secondary level students : presented at the DLSU Research Congress 2018De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines, June 20 to 22, 2018. URL: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2018/lli-14.pdf (accessed: 29.02.2020).
Tian Y., Fang Y., Li J. The effect of metacognitive knowledge on mathematics performance in self-regulated learning framework - multiple mediation of self-efficacy and motivation // Frontiers in Psychology. 2018. Vol. 9, № 1. Р. 1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02518.
Sabna E., Hameed A. Metacognitive awareness for ensuring learning outcomes among higher secondary school students // IOSR Journal of humanities and social science. 2016. Vol. 21, № 4. Р. 101-106.
Panda S. Metacognitive awareness of college students: Perspective of age and gender // Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies. 2017. Vol. 4, № 37. Р. 84028412. DOI: 10.21922/srjis.v4i37.10551.
Zacher H., Hacker W., Frese M. Action Regulation Across the Adult Lifespan (ARAL): a Metatheory of Work and Aging // Work, Aging and Retirement. 2016. Vol. 2, № 3. Р. 286-306. DOI: 10.1093/workar/waw015.
Бызова В.М., Ловягина А.Е., Перикова Е.И. Метакогнитивный подход в диагностике трудностей психической саморегуляции студентов // Российский психологический журнал. 2019. Т. 16, № 2. С. 25-42. DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2019.2.2
Зобков А.В., Турчин А.С. Саморегуляция учебной деятельности. Владимир : Изд-во Владимир. гос. ун-та, 2013. 251 с.
Moritz S., Lysaker P.H., Hofmann S.G. Going meta on metacognitive interventions // Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2018. Vol. 18, № 10. Р. 739-741. DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1520636.
