Influence of Irrational Beliefs and Sensitivity to a Person on Future Psychology Students’ Propensity to Coercion or Nonviolence
The relevance of the problem is due to the importance of identifying factors that determine the propensity of students to coercion or nonviolence, creating psychological and pedagogical conditions for the formation of the socionomic sphere of nonviolent competencies for future specialists at universities. The theoretical basis of the study was the position of nonviolence as a daily practice of interaction, by which we understand the ability of a person to choose from a number of possible alternatives that carry the least charge of coercion. The aim of the work was to study the influence of irrational beliefs and sensitivity to a person (interest, empathy, understanding and assistance) on the students’ tendency to coercion, manipulation, non-violence and non-interference in the processes of interaction with people. The hypothesis was tested that the tendency of students to coercion, manipulation, and noninterference will be due to expressed irrational beliefs and low level of sensitivity to a person and the tendency to non-violence will be explained by the absence of irrational beliefs and a high level of sensitivity to a person. The study involved 125 students of pedagogical and psychological faculties of the Moscow Humanitarian and Cherepovets State universities. The authors used questionnaires to identify the positions of interaction among students and sensitivity to a person, as well as a list of irrational beliefs proposed by A. Beck and A. Freeman. It is established that the tendency to both coercion and manipulation are determined by the beliefs of anti-social type and low sensitivity to the person. The tendency to manipulate the narcissistic beliefs, high interest in people and understanding them, at the same time the tendency to non-violence and non-interference are determined by beliefs of avoidant and dependent types with a low level of understanding people. And a tendency to non-interference is determined by beliefs of dependent type with unexpressed orientation on helping. The tendency to nonviolence is determined by the high sensitivity to a person and the absence of irrational beliefs of antisocial, passive-aggressive and narcissistic types. As a result, the conclusion is made about the need to form purposefully the ability to nonviolent interaction among students, which should include the work on awareness and overcoming irrational beliefs and the development of sensitivity to a person. The obtained results can be used in practical work with students on the formation of their nonviolent competencies.
Keywords
interaction,
coercion,
manipulation,
nonviolence,
non-interference,
sensitivity to a person,
irrational beliefs,
studentsAuthors
| Maralov Vladimir G. | Cherepovets State University | vgmaralov@yandex.ru |
| Sitarov Vyacheslav A. | Moscow City University | sitarov@mail.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Nagler M.N. The Search for a Nonviolent Future. Makawao, HI: Inner Ocean Publishing, 2004. 329 p. URL: https://www.sfsu.edu/~holistic/documents/Spring_2014/Search_for_ NV_Future.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Bharadwaj L.K. Principled versus pragmatic nonviolence // Peace Review. 1998. Vol. 10 (1). P. 79-81. DOI: 10.1080/10402659808426125
Weber T. Nonviolence Is Who? Gene Sharp and Gandhi // Peace & Change. 2003. Vol. 28 (2). P. 250-270. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0130.00261
Сикирин В.Л. О различии принципиального и прагматического ненасилия // Гумани тарные ведомости Тульского государственного педагогического университета им. Л.Н. Толстого. 2013. № 4 (8). С. 225-231. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-razlichii-printsipialnogo-i-pragmaticheskogo-nenasiliya (дата обращения: 25.11.2019).
Mayton D. Nonviolence and Peace Psychology. New York : Springer, 2009. 292 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89348-8_3 (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Wang H. Nonviolence as teacher education: a qualitative study in challenges and possi bilities // Journal of Peace Education. 2018. Vol. 15 (2). P. 216-237. DOI: 10.1080/17400201.2018.1458294
Маралов В.Г., Ситаров В.А. Характеристика позиций взаимодействия как форм вы ражения ценностей принуждения или ненасилия // Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2017. № 1. С. 131-146. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2017.1.9
Patterson G.R. A social learning approach. Coercive family process. Eugene, OR : Castalia Publishing Company, 1982. Vol. 3. 368 p.
Макаренко О.В., Богомаз С.А. Личностные особенности студентов-психологов, склонных к манипулированию // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2005. № 286. С. 105-109. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11992428 (дата обращения: 25.11.2019).
Mayton D., Diessner R., Granby C.D. Nonviolence and Human Values: Empirical Support for Theoretical Relations // Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 1996. Vol. 2 (3). P. 245-253. DOI: 10.1207/s15327949pac0203_5
Davis M.H. Empathy: a social psychological approach. Madison, WI : Brown & Benchmark Publishers, 1994. 260 p.
Thielmann I., Hilbig B.E. Trust: an Integrative Review from a Person-Situation Perspective // Review of General Psychology. 2015. Vol. 19 (3). P. 249-277. URL: https://insights.ovid.com/review-general-psychology/regep/2015/09/000/trust/4/00063906 (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Kleptsova E.Y., Kleptsov N.N., Mishutinskaya E.A., Shubnitsyna T.V., Tsvetkova N.V. Psychological structure of humane interpersonal relations among the subjects of educational activity // Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2018. Vol. 10 (7). P. 1844-1848. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35390024 (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Maralov V.G., Sitarov V.A., Romanyuk L.V. Interaction Positions among Medical Students and Students Trained as Educators and Psychologists // International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences. 2019. Vol. 8 (2). P. 35-47. URL: https://ijpras.com/en/article/interaction-positions-among-medical-students-and-students-trained-as-educators-and-psychologists (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Ellis A. Reason and emotional in psychotherapy: A comprehensive method of treating human disturbance. Revised and updated. New York : Birch Lane Press, 1994. 504 p.
Beck A.T. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York : International Universities Press, 1976. 356 p.
Sakakibara E. Irrationality and Pathology of Beliefs // Neuroethics. 2016. Vol. 9 (147). Р. 147-157. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-016-9256-9
David D., Cotet C., Matu S., Mogoase C., Stefan S. 50 years of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavioral therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Journal Clinical Psychology. 2018. Vol. 74 (3). P. 304-318. Doi: 10.1002/jclp.22514
Beck A.T., Rush A.J., Shaw B.F., Emery G. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York : Guilford Press, 1979. 425 p.
Beck A.T. Cognitive models of depression // Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: an International Quarterly. 1987. Vol. 1. P. 5-37.
David D., Schnur J., Belloiu A. Another Search for the “Hot” Cognitions: Appraisal, Irrational Beliefs, Attributions, and Their Relation to Emotion // Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 2002. Vol. 20 (2). P. 93-131. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019876601693
Ellis A. The role of irrational beliefs in perfectionism // Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment / G.L. Flett, P.L. Hewitt (eds.). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, 2002. P. 217-229. DOI: 10.1037/10458-009
Visla A., Fluckiger C., grosse Holtforth M., David D. Irrational beliefs and psychological distress: a meta-analysis // Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2016. Vol. 85 (1). P. 8-15. DOI: 10.1159/000441231
Davies M.F. Irrational beliefs and unconditional self-acceptance. I. Correlational evidence linking two key features of REBT // Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 2006. Vol. 24. P. 113-124. DOI: 10.1007/s10942-006-0027-0
Jibeen T. Personality dimensions and emotional problems: the mediating role of irrational beliefs in Pakistani adult non-clinical sample // International Journal of Psychology. 2015. Vol. 50. P. 93-100. DOI:10.1002/ijop.12069
Balkis M., Duru E.J. Procrastination and Rational / Irrational Beliefs: A Moderated Mediation Model // Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 2019. Vol. 37. P. 299-315. DOI: 10.1007/s10942-019-00314-6
Rational and irrational beliefs: Research, theory, and clinical practice / D. David, S.J. Lynn, A. Ellis (eds.). New York : Oxford University Press, 2010. 384 p.
Turner M.J. Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), Irrational and Rational Beliefs, and the Mental Health of Athletes // Frontiers in Psychology. 2016. Vol. 7. P. 14-23. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01423
Ebru A., Ozcan A. The Effects of Irrational Beliefs on Academic Motivation and Academic Self-efficacy of Candidate Teachers of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education Department // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol. 197. P. 1287-1292. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82664190.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Beck A.T. Prisoners of hate: the cognitive basis of anger, hostility, and violence. New York : Harper Collins Publishers, 1999. 368 p.
Martin R.C., Dahlen E.R. Cognitive Emotion Regulation In the Prediction of Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Anger // Personality and Individual Differences. 2005. Vol. 39 (7). P. 1249-1260. URL: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/2622 (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Calvete E., Orue I., Gamez-Guadix M., Bushman B.J. Predictors of child-to-parent aggression: a 3-year longitudinal study // Developmental Psychology. 2015. Vol. 51 (5). P. 663-676. DOI: 10.1037/a0039092
Fung A., Lam B. Prevention of Homicide by Treating Proactive Aggression in Schoolchildren / Nonkilling Psychology / D.J. Christie, J.E. Pim (eds.). Honolulu, HI : Center for Global Nonkilling, 2012. P. 189-213.
Goldberg G.M. Irrational Beliefs and Three Interpersonal Styles // Psychological Reports. 1990. Vol. 66 (3). P. 963-969. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.963
Kaygusuz C. Irrational Beliefs and Abuse in University Students' Romantic Relations // Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2013. Vol. 13. P. 141-156.
Мельничук А.С. Иррациональные убеждения о межличностных отношениях как фактор одиночества у студентов // Акмеология. 2018. № 3 (67). С. 34-38. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35584509 (дата обращения: 25.11.2019).
Агнаева К.Х., Верещагина М.В. Копинг-стратегии и переживание одиночества у студентов // Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. 2014. № 2 (28). С. 51-54. URL: https://journal.tltsu.ru/rus/index.php/Vectorscience/article/view/1061/1062 (дата обращения: 25.11.2019).
Rest J.R. Moral development: advances in research and theory. New York : Praeger, 1986. 241 p.
Лаверычева И.Г. Влияние эмпатии на проявления альтруизма и эгоизма // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. 2013. № 160. С. 65-74. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19434477 (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Кузнецова Е.Н. Интерес к человеку как ценностное основание педагогического взаимодействия // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. 2010. № 121. С. 124-127. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15115211 (дата обращения: 25.11.2019).
Роджерс К. Взгляд на психотерапию. Становление человека. М. : Прогресс : Универс, 1994. 479 с.
Бодалев А.А. Восприятие и понимание человека человеком. М. : Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1982. 200 с.
Ильин Е.П. Психология помощи. Альтруизм, эгоизм, эмпатия. СПб. : Питер, 2013. 304 с.
Маралов В.Г., Романюк Л.В. Влияние чувствительности к человеку на принятие позиций взаимодействия студентами // Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2018. № 3. С. 180-195. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2018.3.17
Маралов В.Г., Ситаров В.А. Разработка диагностического опросника по выявлению позиций взаимодействия у студентов - будущих специалистов сферы психологопедагогического сопровождения // Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2018. № 1. С. 167177. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2018.1.13
Маралов В.Г., Ситаров В.А., Романюк Л.В., Корягина И.И., Фортунатов А.А., Агеева Л.С. Практикум по формированию позиции ненасилия студентов - будущих специалистов сферы психолого-педагогического сопровождения. М. : Моск. гуманитар. ун-т, 2019. 198 с.
Бек А., Фримен А. Когнитивная психотерапия расстройств личности. СПб. : Питер, 2019. 448 с.
Wang H. An Integrative Psychic Life, Nonviolent Relations, and Curriculum Dynamics in Teacher Education // Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2019. Vol. 38 (4). P. 377-395. DOI: 10.1007/s11217-019-09661-4
