Intellectual Risk Assessment as an Indicator of Psychological Health in Youth in Situations of Risk and Uncertainty
The concept of risk marks modern society due to variability and unpredictability of political, social and epidemiological processes. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light the issue of uncertainty and ways to respond to it. New threats to the psychological well-being of the population define the need in search for additional cognitive and personal resources that contribute to human psychological health. Intellectual risk assessment is a relatively understudied phenomenon. Therefore, it is of great interest to explore the role of this concept in maintaining and shaping youth psychological health in situations of uncertainty. The aim of the study is to estimate and analyze the relationship between psychological health and intellectual risk assessment of youth in situations of risk and uncertainty. Research methods and materials. The research sample consisted of 555 people (307 of them were university students and 248 were working youth). Research methods: The Mental Health Continuum questionnaire, MHC-SF (C.L.M. Keyes, adapted by E.N. Osin); Intellectual Risk Assessment questionnaire (G. Craparo, P. Magnano, A. Paolillo et al., adapted by T.V. Kornilova, E. M. Pavlova). Results. Factor and dispersion analyses were applied. As a result of the use of factor analysis, three o factors were revealed: Cognitive and personal resource, Personal resource of sustainability, Resource of well-being. The index of intellectual risk assessment was introduced (the index of IRA, forms a single structure with indicators of psychological health). A variance analysis of the measured characteristics of students and working youth showed no differences in the parameters of cognitive and personal resources. Despite the high values of Self-efficacy and Imagination, students tend to be less psychologically stable, show a low degree of tolerance to the situation of uncertainty and have lower indicators of psychological health compared to a group of working youth. The results obtained can be used to implement psychological practices that develop the resources of psychological health of young people and their resistance to exposure to risks.
Keywords
risk society,
situation of uncertainty,
psychological health,
students,
youth,
the index of intellectual risk assessment,
self-efficacy,
imagination,
psychological well-beingAuthors
| Levitskaya Tatyana E. | Tomsk State University | levic69@mail.ru |
| Nazmetdinova Dilara G. | Tomsk State University | dilara86@bk.ru |
| Markman Irina Yu. | Tomsk State University | ira.markman@gmail.com |
| Bogomaz Sergei A. | Tomsk State University | bogomazsa@mail.ru |
| Tsehmeistruk Ekaterina A. | Tomsk State University | mea2887@mail.ru |
Всего: 5
References
Асмолов, А. Г. (2018). Психология современности: вызовы неопределенности, сложности, разнообразия. В кн.: А.Г. Асмолов (ред.). Mobilis in mobili: личность в эпоху перемен (с. 13-29). М.: ЯСК.
Борисов, Г.И. (2020). Подходы к изучению психологического благополучия. В кн.: С. Б. Малых, Т. И. Тихомирова, И.А. Ершова (ред.). Психология образования: современный вектор развития (с. 157-174). Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. фед. ун-та им. первого Президента России Б. Н. Ельцина.
Дубровина, И. В. (2020). Феномен "психологическое благополучие" в контексте социальной ситуации развития. Вестник практической психологии образования, 17(3), 9-21.
Дубровина, И. В. (2022). Психологическое здоровье личности как феномен. Гуманизация образования, 4, 35-43.
Корнилова, Т. В., Павлова, Е. М. (2020). Шкала интеллектуальной оценки риска и ее связь с готовностью к риску и эмоциональным интеллектом. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, 28(4), 59-78.
Маслоу, А. (1997). Дальние пределы человеческой психики. СПб.: Евразия.
Минияров, В. M., Шакурова, A. A. (2024). Ценностное отношение личности к своему психологическому здоровью: подходы к определению. Вестник университета, 3, 213-220.
Нестик, Т. А., Журавлев, А. Л. (2018). Отношение к глобальным рискам: социально-психологический анализ. Психологический журнал, 39(1), 127-138.
Осин, Е. Н., Леонтьев, Д. А. (2020). Краткие русскоязычные шкалы диагностики субъективного благополучия: психометрические характеристики и сравнительный анализ. Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены, 1, 117-142.
Рябцева, Е. В. (2021). Влияние пандемии Covid-19 на психологическое здоровье человека: обзор литературы. Инновационная наука, 8-2, 39-41.
Соколовская, Л. Б. (2012). Критерии психологического здоровья человека. В сб.: И. О. Логинова (ред.). Психологическое здоровье человека: жизненный ресурс и жизненный потенциал: материалы Всерос. науч.-практ. конф. (с. 50-59). Красноярск: Версо.
Филенко, И. А., Богомаз, С. А. (2022). Изменение характеристик регуляторных процессов и ценностных ориентаций студенческой молодежи в условиях пандемии. Сибирский психологический журнал, 83, 46-66.
Филоненко, И. С. (2022). Апробация методики "Индивидуальная модель психологического здоровья". Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Сер. Психология, 2(32), 63-73.
Хисариева, Н. А. (2022). Взаимосвязь психологического здоровья и адаптированности студентов к вузу. Вестник магистратуры, 2-1(125), 104-110.
Шестова, М. А. (2021). Связи эмоциональной сферы и толерантности к неопределенности с продуктивными стратегиями принятия решений. Вестник Самарского государственного технического университета. Сер. Психолого-педагогические науки, 18(3), 145-156.
Alwan, M. H. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on Dental Students'. Psychological Health, 8(2), 6-12.
Baizhumanova, B., Berdibayeva, S., Arzymbetova, S., Garber, A., Duanayeva, S. & Kulzhabayeva, L. (2024). Role of Stress and Resilience in the Psychological Health of Students Studying Abroad. The Open Psychology Journal, 17: e18743501309040.
Bokhan, T. G., Galazhinsky, E. V., Leontiev, D. A., Rasskazova, E. I., Terekhina, O. V., Ulyanich, A. L.,... & Vidyakina, T. A. (2021). Covid-19 and subjective well-being: perceived impact, positive psychological resources and protective behavior. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 18(2), 259-275.
Craparo, G., Magnano, P., Paolillo, A. & Costantino, V. (2018). The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The development of a new scale to measure a new construct. Current Psychology, 37(4), 966-981.
Deb, S., Dorji, N., Kar, S., Sunny, A. M., Deb, S., Ghosh, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2023). COVID-19 and stress of Indian youth: An association with background, on-line mode of teaching, resilience and hope. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 12, 100502.
Evans, D. (2012). Risk Intelligence: How to Live with Uncertainty. London: Atlantic Books.
Harwood, L. (2020). Pandemic Uncertainty: Considerations for Nephrology Nurses. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 47(2), 127-130.
Kharel, I., Shrestha, P., Maharjan, L., Pandit, R., Malla-Pradhan, R., & Paudel, M. (2024). Depression, Anxiety and Stress of COVID-19 among Bachelor students in Health Science Colleges of Kathmandu. Morgan Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Studies, 1(1), 15-24.
Lamers, S. M. A., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., ten Klooster, P. M. & Keyes, C. L. M. (2011). Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 99-110.
Li, Z., Liang, X., Liao, J., Li, M. J., Ji, F. B. & Xiao, W. (2022). Technologies to support the psychological health and well-being of social workers in China, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 8(4), 47-56.
Magnano, P., Santisi, G., Zammitti, A., Zarbo, R., Scuderi, V. E., Valenti, G. D. & Faraci, P. (2022). The Relationship between Subjective Risk Intelligence and Courage with Working Performance: The Potential Mediating Effect of Workplace Social Courage. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12, 431-444.
Park, C. L. (2020). Religiousness and meaning making following stressful life events. In The science of religion, spirituality, and existentialism (pp. 273-285). Academic Press.
Pfattheicher, S., Nockur, L., Böhm, R., Sassenrath, C. & Petersen, M. (2020). The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Science, 31(11), 1363-1373.
Santosha, S., Tiwari, V., Chand, S., Dikkatwar, M., Roy, S. & Bindu, R. (2024). Factors Affecting Psychological Health in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews, 20.
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322-325.
Wolf, L. J., Haddock, G., Manstead, A. S., & Maio, G. R. (2020). The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 618-627.
Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J. P., Osin, E. N., Cieciuch, J., Adams, B. G., Ardi, R.,... & Maltby, J. (2018). The mental health continuum-short form: The structure and application for cross-cultural studies-A 38 nation study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(6), 1034-1052.
Zhang, D. C. (2019). Development and validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32, 152-167.
Zhu, C., Shengmei, P., Liu, J. I. & Duan, Q. (2024). Current Progress, Challenges and Prospects in the Development of COVID-19 Vaccines. Drugs, 84(4).
