International Exchange: The Adaptation of Foreign Students in the Learning Process in the Russian University System (a Case Study of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics) | Rusin. 2020. № 62. DOI: 10.17223/18572685/62/13

International Exchange: The Adaptation of Foreign Students in the Learning Process in the Russian University System (a Case Study of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics)

The article focuses on the multi-ethnic environment of the University, which reflects both multi-vector global and local processes and specificity of educational practices affecting the relationships in the University eco-environment. The authors consider the processes of adaptation of international exchange students in Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (TUSUR) and the importance of intercultural interaction within these processes. Special attention is given to the harmonization of the University interethnic environment, the formation of friendly barrier-free interaction, which is possible because of the systemic work of educational process participants. The object of the research is the adaptation and intercuLturaL communication in the student environment, with the focus on the specificity of adaptation of international exchange students. The authors draw on the theory of intercultural communication and employ methods of sociological survey and mathematical statistics. The survey, conducted in the fall of 2019 among 120 first-and second-year students from 36 countries with the use of a spontaneous sample type. The respondents were offered a questionnaire aimed at identifying the most urgent problems of adaptation in TUSUR. The survey resulted in a review of the challenges related to the adaptation of foreign students to new conditions in the host community. The results of the research bring to light new sociocultural approaches to the work with foreign students and can be used to optimize the interethnic interaction activities of educational system agents.

Download file
Counter downloads: 142

Keywords

adaptation, foreign students, educational multi-ethnic environment, intercultural communication, positive atmosphere, interculturalism

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Zinoviyeva Valentina I.Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronicsvalentina.zinoviyeva@gmail.com
Pokrovskaya Elena M.Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronicspemod@yandex.ru
Raitina Margarita Yu.Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronicsraitina@mail.ru
Всего: 3

References

Абдулатипов Р.Г. Российская нация. Этнонациональная и гражданская идентичность россиян в современных условиях. М.: Научная книга, 2005. 472 с.
Асмолов А.Г., Солдатова Г.У., Макарчук А.В. Искусство жить с непохожими людьми: психотехника толерантности. М.: Московия, 2009. 311 с.
Баранова В.В. Языковая социализация детей мигрантов // Антропологический форум. 2012. № 17. С. 157-172.
Каленкова О.Н., Омельченко Е.А., Феоктистова Т.Л., Шорина Т.А. Учимся жить в России: Пособие по социокультурной адаптации. М.: ГАОУ ВПО МИОО - Этносфера, 2012. 208 с.
Куроптяник А.И., Куроптяник М.С. Интеркультурализм: постмультикультуральный дискурс социальной интеграции // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Социология. 2018. Т. 18, № 2. С. 259-261.
Рот Ю., Коптельцева Г.М. Межкультурная коммуникация. Теория и тренинг: учеб.-метод. пособие. М.: Юнити-Дана, 2017. 223 с.
Рыжова С.В. Этническая идентичность в контексте толерантности. М.: Альфа-М, 2011. 280 с.
Смолина Т.Л., Мельникова А.А. Психология кросс-культурной адаптации. СПб.: Издательско-торговый дом «Скифия», 2017. 304 с.
Тер-Минасова С.Г. Язык и межкультурная коммуникация. М.: Слово/ SLovo, 2000. 261 с.
Шапошникова Т.Д. Поликультурное образование в современном мире // Начальная школа плюс До и После. 2011. №. 2. С. 5-17.
Шахова Е.В. Особенности проявления межэтнического взаимодействия в Алтайском крае (по результатам социологического исследования) // Социодинамика. 2019. № 7. С. 1-9. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2019.7.30006
Bouchard G. L’Interculturalisme. Un point de vue québécois. Montréal, Les Éditions du Boréal. 2012. 288 p.
Levrau F., Loobuyck P. Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate. // Comparative Migration Studies. 2018. Vol. 6, is. 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-018-0080-8
Modood T. Multiculturalism. A Civic Idea. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons, 2007. 160 p.
Ping L., Jing X., Othman B., Kadir Z. et al. An Intercultural Management Perspective of Foreign Student's Adaptation in Chinese Universities: A Case Study of China Three Gorges University // Engineering technology & applied science research. 2019. Vol. 9, is. 2. P 3971-3977.
Unal D. Turkish People and Turkish Culture: An Investigation of Erasmus Experience Reports Relating to Intercultural Communication // BILIG. 2018. Is. 87. P 1-32.
Velasco F. Interculturality as a Competence in Higher Education: Validation of an Instrument with University Students // Revista digital de investigacion en docencia universitaria-ridu. 2018. Vol. 12, is. 2. P 220-236.
Vertovec S. Super-diversity and its implications, Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2007. Vol. 30 (6). P 1024-1054.
Zapata Barrero R. The three strands of intercultural policies: a comprehensive view. A critical review of Bouchard and Cantle recent books on interculturalism // GRITIM-UPF Working Paper Series. 2013. Vol. 17. P 1-37.
 International Exchange: The Adaptation of Foreign Students in the Learning Process in the Russian University System (a Case Study of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics) | Rusin. 2020. № 62. DOI: 10.17223/18572685/62/13

International Exchange: The Adaptation of Foreign Students in the Learning Process in the Russian University System (a Case Study of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics) | Rusin. 2020. № 62. DOI: 10.17223/18572685/62/13

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1017