The influence of institutional discourses on linguistic self-determination in a multiethnic society
The article analyses the interaction between the native language (Tatar) and the second language (Russian) in the linguistic consciousness of the Tatar-Russian bilingual, who lives in Southern Siberia in a multicultural society. The Russian language acts as a macro-intermediary language, being the official language of the country. The data was collected be means of a sociolinguistic questionnaire, designed by OA. Kazakevich, and the Marian, Blumenfeld and Kaushanskaya bilingual language questionnaire adapted by the TSU Laboratory of Linguistic Anthropology. The survey was conducted in Tomsk and Tomsk Region (the villages of Eushta and Chernaya Rechka), and Novosibirsk Region - in the areas of compact residence of Tatar-Russian bilinguals. The number of the Tatar-Russian bilinguals interviewed during the survey is 133 people. The socio-linguistic information provided by the respondents makes it possible to distinguish between three groups of factors determining the Tatar and Russian interacting in various periods of their lives. The Tatar-Russian bilinguals adhere to the language they consider to be L1 (Tatar) notwithstanding the fact that it is turning to a heritage language with a restricted sphere of usage. With Russian taking the dominating position in social and professional communication, Tatar becomes the language of interpersonal communication between family members. Nevertheless, the Tatar language seems to play a pivotal role in determining the national identity by bilinguals.
Keywords
unbalanced bilingualism,
Tatar-Russian bilinguals,
language interaction,
institutional discourse,
family languageAuthors
Temnikova Irina G. | Tomsk State University | temnikova196@mail.ru |
Dibrova Veronika S. | Tomsk State University | klobukova-veronika@list.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Словарь социолингвистических терминов / гл. ред. В.Ю. Михальченко. М.: Российская академия наук; Институт языкознания; Российская академия лингвистических наук, 2006. URL: https://rus-soc-lingvo-terms.slovaronline.com/ (дата обращения: 02.10.2022).
Резанова З.И., Темникова И.Г., Некрасова Е.Д. Динамика социолингвистических процессов в Южной Сибири в зеркале билингвизма (русско- шорское и русско-татарское языковое взаимодействие) // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2018. № 436. С. 56-68.
Резанова З.И., Дыбо А.В. Языковое взаимодействие в речевых практиках шорско-русских билингвов Южной Сибири // Известия Уральского федерального университета. Сер. 2: Гуманитарные. науки. 2019. Т. 21, № 2 (187). С. 195-211.
Новожилов А.Г. Сохранение языков коренных малочисленных народов в условиях глобализации (опыт Северо-Запада России) // Русин. 2022. № 67. С. 361-374.
Нагель О.В., Темникова И.Г. Интерферентное влияние татарского языка в речевых практиках татарско-русских билингвов // Русин. 2019. № 56. С. 213-225.
Казакевич О.А. Документация исчезающих языков Сибири (на материале двух поселков Красноярского края) // Вестник Российского гуманитарного научного фонда. 2006. № 3 (44). С. 221-231.
Жеребило Т.В. Словарь лингвистических терминов. URL: https://rus-lingvistics-dict.slovaronline.com/ (дата обращения: 02.10.2022).
Ortega L. The Study of Heritage Language Development From a Bilingual ism and Social Justice Perspective // Language Learning. 2020. № 70 (S1). P. 15-53.
Wei R., Reynolds B.L., Kong M. et al. Is bilingualism linked to national identity? Evidence from a big data survey // Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 2022. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/ (дата обращения: 09.10.2022).
Marian V., Blumenfeld H.K., Kaushanskaya M. Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q) // Speech Language and Hearing Research. 2007. № 50 (4). Р. 940-967. URL: http://www.bilingualism.northwestern.edu/leapq (дата обращения: 29.09.2022).
Kašćelan D., Prévost P., Serratrice L. et al. A review of questionnaires quantifying bilingual experience in children: Do they document the same constructs? // Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2022. № 25. P. 29-41.
Benmamoun E., Montrul S., Polinsky M. Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics // Theoretical Linguistics. 2013. № 39. P. 129-181.