To the study of the structure of hagiographic fragments containing visions (Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon and the Life of Alexander Svirsky) | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2022. № 3. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/80/2

To the study of the structure of hagiographic fragments containing visions (Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon and the Life of Alexander Svirsky)

Old Russian stories about visions in the context of writings have a movable structure that cannot be presented in the form of an absolutely stable scheme. However, abstracting from the content and analyzing the construction of a particular event in the narrative allows revealing a general construction scheme of the fragments “with visions”, suggesting a common structural scheme of the structure of any fragment “with visions” in Old Russian literature. To confirm this idea, the paper considers the structure of hagiographic fragments from “The Tale of Isakiy of the Caves” (Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon) written in the 13th century and “The Life of Alexander Svirsky” of the 16th century including stories about the visions of monks contrasting in content. In “Patericon Tale,” the title character is faced with the demons in the guise of angels and a demon who has taken on the likeness of Christ. On the contrary, Alexander Svirsky is graced with a vision of angels and the Trinity. Not only are the common structural elements analyzed, but also the differing ones. It is shown that regardless of the content of the stories about visions, the fragments are constructed according to the general scheme. The elements of this scheme together are the mechanism driving the movement of events in the narrative, with vision being one of the necessary functional components. Different elements are interconnected with the behavior of the main characters of the works and their semantic organization.

Download file
Counter downloads: 12

Keywords

Old Russian hagiography, genre of visions, structural text analysis, Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon, the Life of Aleхander Svirsky

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kovaleva Tatiana I.Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciencestkvl@inbox.ru
Всего: 1

References

Древнерусские патерики Киево-Печерский патерик. Волоколамский патерик. М. Наука, 1999. 496 с.
Житие Александра Свирского Текст и словоуказатель. СПб., 2002. 216 с.
Климова М. Н. От протопопа Аввакума до Федора Абрамова жития «грешных святых» в русской литературе. М. Индрик, 2010. 136 с.
Ковалева Т. И. Видения в агиографических памятниках древнерусской литературы XIII-XVII вв. жанровая эволюция и сюжетосложение Автореф. дис.. канд. филол. наук. Томск, 2017. 21 с.
Ковалева Т. И. Опыт типологии видений в древнерусской агиографии XIII-XVII вв. // Сюжетология и сюжетография. 2019. № 1. С. 87-103. DOI 10.25205/2410-7883-2019-1-87-103
Лопарев Х. М. Византийские жития святых VIII-IX веков // Византийский временник. СПб., 1911. Т. 17, вып. 1-4. С. 1-224.
Ольшевская Л. А. «Прелесть простоты и вымысла…» // Древнерусские патерики Киево-Печерский патерик. Волоколамский патерик. М. Наука, 1999. С. 233-252.
Пигин А. В. Видения потустороннего мира в русской рукописной книжности. СПб. Дмитрий Буланин, 2006. 430 с.
Прокофьев Н. И. Видение как жанр в древнерусской литературе // Учен. зап. Моск. гос. пед. ин-та им. В. И. Ленина. М., 1964. Т. 231. С. 35-56.
Прокофьев Н. И. Образ повествователя в жанре «видений» литературы Древней Руси // Учен. зап. Моск. гос. пед. ин-та им. В. И. Ленина. М., 1967. Т. 256, ч. 1. С. 36-53.
Ромодановская Е. К. Сибирь и литература XVII век. Новосибирск: Наука, 2002. 390 с.
 To the study of the structure of hagiographic fragments containing visions (Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon and the Life of Alexander Svirsky) | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2022. № 3. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/80/2

To the study of the structure of hagiographic fragments containing visions (Kiyevo-Pecherskiy Patericon and the Life of Alexander Svirsky) | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2022. № 3. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/80/2