The ways of expressing attributive possession in Ket: possessive syntactic constructions | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2021. № 2. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/75/17

The ways of expressing attributive possession in Ket: possessive syntactic constructions

The paper analyzes the structural models of Ket possessive constructions. The means of expressing possessive construction components and the ways of marking possessive relations between the first possessive construction component denoting the subject of possession (a possessor) and the second component indicating the object of possession (a possessum) are considered. The study is based on the conception proposed by E. Vajda, according to which the possessive markers are possessive pronominal clitics, used as either clitics or proclitics, depending on the context. Two-component and multiple-component constructions are identified. The two-component constructions contain a possessor, a possessum, and a linking marker, the semantic scope of which is a possessum. The non-expanded and expanded possessive constructions are analyzed. Both the first and the second substantive component of the two-component construction may be expanded by an attribute. The two-component constructions having a possessor expanded by an attribute are characterized by a distant ordering of a possessor noun and a possessum noun, including distant positions of a possessive proclitic and a possessum noun. The derivative processes of transforming possessive constructions are considered. The rising derivation process consists of embedding one more possessor into the construction with an original possessor. Both possessors are marked by appropriate possessive pronominal clitics. It is found that in Ket, the recessive derivation of omitting a possessor noun expressed by a personal pronoun stem is available as well, resulting in a construction with a non-expressed (omitted) possessor. The corresponding possessive pronominal clitic attaching proclitically to possessum noun is overtly retained at the surface morphosyntactic level.

Download file
Counter downloads: 68

Keywords

syntactic derivation, expanded possessive constructios, two-component and multiple-component constructions, possessive construction structure, possession, possessive markers, Ket language

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Butorin Sergey S.Institute of Philology SB RASbutorin_ss@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Vajda E. J. Metathesis and reanalysis in Ket // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2013b. № 1 (1). P. 14-26.
Werner H. Die ketische Sprache. Wiesbaden, 1997. 407 S.
Vajda E. J. Ket // Languages of the World / Materials. 204. Lincom Europa, 2004. 99 p.
Vajda E. J. Head-negating enclitics in Ket // Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian languages / Ed. by Edward J. Vajda. Amsterdam, 2008. P. 179-201. (Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory, ISSN 0304-0763; vol. 300)
Vajda E. J. Vestigial possessive morphology in Na-Dene and Yeniseian. // Working Papers in Athabaskan (Dene) Languages 2012.
Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь / Гл. ред. В. Н. Ярцева. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1990. 685 с.
Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers / Eds. Sharon Hargus, Edward Vajda, Daniel Hieber. Fairbanks, AK: ANLC, 2013a. No. 11. P. 79-91. URL: https://www.uaf.edu/anlc/docs/Vajda_2013_ Vestigi-al.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2021).
Georg S. A Descriptive Grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak). Part 1: Introduction, Phonology, Morphology. Global Oriental Ltd, 2007, 328 p.
Nichols J. Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar // Language. 1986. Vol. 62, no. 1. Р. 56-119.
Крюкова E. А., Глазунов П. Ю. Кетские тексты // Аннотированные фольклорные тексты обско-енисейского языкового ареала. Томск: Ветер, 2010. С. 185-211.
Крюкова Е А. Предикативные посессивные конструкции в кетском языке (корпусное исследование) // Томский журнал лингвистических и антропологических исследований. 2016. № 4 (14). C. 22-36.
Крюкова Е. А., Нефёдов А. В. Выражение посессивных отношений в кетском языке: прототипичные конструкции и периферия // Томский журнал лингвистических и антропологических исследований. 2017. № 4 (18). С. 42-55.
Крейнович Е. А. Кетский язык // Языки народов СССР. Л.: Наука, 1968б. Т. 5: Монгольские, тунгусо-маньчжурские и палеоазиатские языки. С. 453-473.
Крейнович Е. А. Загадки // Кетский сборник. Мифология, этнография, тексты. М.: Наука, 1969. С. 231-235.
Крюкова Е А. Именные посессивные конструкции в кетском языке // Томский журнал лингвистических и антропологических исследований. 2015. № 4 (10). С. 55-61.
Дульзон А. П. Кетские сказки и другие тексты // Кетский сборник. Мифология, этнография, тексты. М.: Наука, 1969. С. 167-212.
Которова Е Г., Нефёдов А. В. Типологические характеристики кетского языка: вершинное или зависимостное кодирование? // Вопросы языкознания. 2006. № 5. С. 43-56.
Крейнович Е. А. Глагол кетского языка. Л.: Наука, 1968а. 283 c.
Дульзон А. П. Кетские сказки // Очерки по грамматике кетского языка. Томск: Изд-во ТГУ, 1964. С. 140-217.
Дульзон А. П. Кетские сказки. Томск: Изд-во ТГУ, 1966. 167 с.
Дульзон А. П. Кетский язык. Томск: Изд-во ТГУ, 1968. 635 с.
Бондарко А. В. Вступительные замечания // Теория функциональной грамматики. Локативность. Бытийность. Посессивность. Обусловленность. СПб.: Наука, 1996. С. 99-100.
Дульзон А. П. Кетские сказки и другие тексты // Учен. зап. Том. гос. пед. ин-та. 1962. Т. 20, вып. 2. С. 144-180.
 The ways of expressing attributive possession in Ket: possessive syntactic constructions | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2021. № 2. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/75/17

The ways of expressing attributive possession in Ket: possessive syntactic constructions | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2021. № 2. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/75/17

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 353