On the interaction of phonetic parameters implementing the voiced / voiceless phonological opposition in Standard Modern Russian | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2021. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/77/11

On the interaction of phonetic parameters implementing the voiced / voiceless phonological opposition in Standard Modern Russian

The paper reports new data obtained in the experimental study of voice coarticulation of voiced and voiceless obstruents adjacent to sonorant depending on the place and manner of articulation of these consonants in Standard Modern Russian. The experimental results revealed the voice coarticulation of the obstruent in word-internal clusters of [sonorant + obstruent + sonorant] coronal consonants, possibly due to the preceding homorganic nasal consonant. In the case of sonorants [nasal + voiceless stop + vibrant] that are not identical in place and manner of articulation, the closure part of the dental stop becomes voiced throughout, with this phonation type accommodation not leading, nevertheless, to the voiced / voiceless phoneme neutralization since the contrast in question is still maintained by phonetic parameters other than voice (phonation itself). These are closure duration, burst duration, and relative overall intensity. On the contrary, in the case of dental sonorants [nasal + voiceless stop + nasal] being identical in place and manner of articulation, the contrast in burst duration is eliminated since no burst of dental stop is found in the position before homorganic nasal, with the closure part of the stop not acquiring voicing to prevent the voiced / voiceless phoneme neutralization. In conclusion, it is argued that in Standard Modern Russian, the phonetic parameter [relative overall intensity] is less significant in the hierarchical structure of distinctive phonological feature than [closure voicing] and [burst duration] ones since it cannot serve as the only parameter distinguishing the voiced and voiceless obstruents in the intersonorant position.

Download file
Counter downloads: 22

Keywords

phonetics, voice coarticulation, place & manner of articulation, neutralization, voiced & voiceless obstruents, phonetic structure of phonological feature

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Knyazev Sergey V.Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciencessvknia@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Аванесов Р. И. Фонетика современного русского литературного языка. М.: МГУ, 1956. 239 с.
Князев С. В. Коартикуляция на стыках слов как показатель наличия просодического шва в русском языке // Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии: По материалам ежегодной Междунар. конф. «Диалог» (Москва, 1-4 июня 2016 г.). М.: Изд-во РГГУ, 2016. Вып. 15 (22). С. 237-247.
Князев С. В. Фонационное варьирование согласных в связи с их способом и местом образования в русском языке // Вопросы языкознания. 2021. № 3. С. 7-25.
Князев С. В., Красько А. В. Коартикуляция по голосу в сочетаниях «велярный + звонкий губно-зубной спирант» внутри и на стыках фонетических слов в современном русском языке // Русский язык в научном освещении. 2019. № 2. С. 9-24.
Князев С. В., Пожарицкая С. К. Современный русский язык. Фонетика. М.: Юрайт, 2020. 380 с.
Кодзасов С. В. Об универсальном наборе фонетических признаков // Экспериментальные исследования в психолингвистике. М.: Наука, 1982. С. 94-108.
Кодзасов С. В., Кривнова О. Ф. Общая фонетика. М.: РГГУ, 2001. 590 с.
Кузнецова А. М. Некоторые вопросы фонетической характеристики явления твердости-мягкости согласных в русских говорах // Экспериментально-фонетическое изучение русских говоров: Сб. ст. М.: Наука, 1969. С. 35-137.
Панов М. В. Современный русский язык. Фонетика. М., 1979. 254 с.
Brockhaus W. Final devoicing in the phonology of German. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1995. P. xii, 273. (Linguistische Arbeiten, 336)
Charles-Luce J. Word-final devoicing in German and the effects of phonetic and sentential contexts // Journal of Phonetics. 1985. No. 13. P. 309-324.
Dmitrieva O., Jongman A., Sereno J. Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing // Journal of Phonetics. 2010. No. 38. P. 483-492.
Dommelen W. A. van. Parameter interaction in the perception of French plosives // Phonetica. 1983. Vol. 40 (1). P. 32-62.
Jacobson R. Die Verteilung der stimmhaften und stimmlosen Geräuschlaute in Russischen // Woltner M., Bräuer H. (Hrgs.). Festschrift für Max Vasmer. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. P. 199-202.
Knyazev S. Affricated dental plosives in Russian: phonological status and perceptual cues as a trigger of sound changes // Linguistica Lettica. 2014. Vol. 24. P. 140-149.
Knyazev S., Petrova I., Vorontsova I. Voice Coarticulation Across Word Boundaries in /v/ + /v/ Sequences in Standard Russian // AFCP Workshop “Coarticulation: cues, direction, and representation”. Montpellier, France, December 7, 2007. Montpellier, 2007. P. 247-251.
Kohler K. J. Dimensions in the perception of fortis and lenis plosives // Phonetica. 1979. No. 36. P. 332-343.
Kohler K. J. F0 in the Production of Lenis and Fortis Plosives // Phonetica. 1982. No. 39. P. 199-218.
Kohler K. J. Phonetic Explanation in Phonology: The Feature Fortis / Lenis // Phonetica. 1984. No. 41. P. 150-174.
Kohler K. J. F0 in the perception of lenis and fortis plosives // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1985. Vol. 78 (1). P. 21-32.
Kohler K. J. Neutralization?! The phonetics-phonology issue in the analysis of word-final obstruent voicing // Gybbon D., Hirst D., Campbell N. (eds.). Rhythm, Melody and Harmony in Speech. Studies in Honour of Wiktor Jassem. Poznań, Polish Phonetic Association, 2012. P. 171-180.
Kohler K. J., Dommelen W. A. van. The effects of voice quality on the perception of lenis / fortis stops // J. of Phonetics. 1987. No. 15. P. 365-381.
Lisker L. Rapid vs Rabid: A catalogue of acoustic features that may cue the distinction. Haskins Laboratories. 1978. Status Report on Speech Research SR-54.
Malecot A. The Lenis-Fortis opposition: its physiological parameter // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1970. Vol. 47 (6), part 2. P. 1588-1592.
Ohde R. N. Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984. Vol. 75 (1). P. 224-230.
Ohman S. E. G. Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1966. No. 39. P. 151-168.
Oostendorp M. van. Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology // Lingua. 2008. Vol. 118 (9). P. 1362-1377.
Port R., Mitleb F., O’Dell M. Neutralization of obstruent voicing in German is incomplete // Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1981. No. 70, S13, F10.
Port R., O’Dell M. Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German // Journal of Phonetics. 1985. No. 13. P. 455-471.
Slis I. M., Cohen A. On the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction // Language and Speech. 1969. Vol. 12. P. 80-102 (article I); 137-155 (article II).
Winter B., Roettger T. The Nature of Incomplete Neutralization in German: Implications for Laboratory Phonology // Grazer Linguistische Studien. 2011. No. 76. P. 55-74.
 On the interaction of phonetic parameters implementing the voiced / voiceless phonological opposition in Standard Modern Russian | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2021. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/77/11

On the interaction of phonetic parameters implementing the voiced / voiceless phonological opposition in Standard Modern Russian | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2021. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/77/11

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 449