Literary and dialect variants of the lexical-semantic field of “vred” (harm): comparative aspect | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2022. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/78/17

Literary and dialect variants of the lexical-semantic field of “vred” (harm): comparative aspect

This paper compares the semantic structure and motivational characteristics of the lexical-semantic field of “vred” (harm) in the literary and dialectal Russian language. The analysis has shown the similarity of the conceptual basis for dividing the field into subfields in the literary language and dialects (“harm to the health of the subject,” “harm to the material condition of the subject,” “harm to the life of the subject and society (in general)”). The comparison of fields in terms of motivation revealed eight motivational models with different lexical representations in the literary language and dialects: three are widely represented in the Russian literary language and dialects, while five are much less productive. Absolute superiority in the quantitative realization of dialects compared with the literary language is observed in the motivational model “vred / vrednyy / vredit’” (harm / harmful / to harm), “a magical action, when the evil eye brings the subject into a painful, unnatural state,” indicating the traces of the pagan (in the form of superstition) worldview of traditional culture bearers. Combining the synchronic approach analysis with the diachronic one allowed revealing the historical depth of the formation of the concept “harm” and definite stability in its modeling since the Proto-Slavonic period. With the historical variation of the conceptual basis for the division of the field into subfields in the literary language and dialects, the similarity identified indicates the general structure of the fragment in question of the linguistic picture of the world in the national consciousness.

Download file
Counter downloads: 24

Keywords

lexico-semantic field “Harm”, comparative aspect, semantic structure, motivational characteristic

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Liu YanchunDalian University of Foreign Languagesliuyanchun@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Азылбекова Г. О. Семантико-прагматические особенности утилитарной оценки (на материале русского и немецкого языков): Дис.. канд. филол. наук. Тобольск, 2011. 205 с.
Дронова Л. П., Лю Яньчунь. Что такое вред? (Мотивационно-генетические связи рус. вред) // Вестник Том. гос. ун-та. 2016. № 412. С. 14-19.
Дронова Л. П., Лю Яньчунь. Мотивационно-генетическая характеристика лексико-семантического поля «Вред» в русском литературном языке // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2017. № 4. С. 202-213.
Лю Яньчунь. Мотивационная структура субполя «Сглаз, порча» лексико-семантического поля «Вред» в диалектах русского языка // Вестник Том. гос. ун-та. 2018. № 427. С. 47-54.
Погорелова С. Д. Сопоставительное исследование лексики утилитарной оценки в русском и английском языках (по материалам лексикографии): Дис.. канд. филол. наук. Екатеринбург, 2002. 238 с.
Савельева Е. А. Концептуализация утилитарных оценок полезный / вредный в русском языке: Дис.. канд. филол. наук. Омск, 2014. 211 с.
Хорошунова И. В. Семантические процессы в лексико-семантическом поле (на материале лексико-семантического поля утилитарной оценки «ПОЛЬЗА / ВРЕД»): Дис.. канд. филол. наук. Воронеж, 2002. 344 с.
 Literary and dialect variants of the lexical-semantic field of “vred” (harm): comparative aspect | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2022. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/78/17

Literary and dialect variants of the lexical-semantic field of “vred” (harm): comparative aspect | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2022. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/78/17