Expository text grammar and disciplinary knowledge (presupposition)
The paper describes the expository text as the model of disciplinary knowledge. Consideration is given to the type of epistemic modality associated with presupposition, i.e., knowledge known and relevant to the participants of communication. Text analysis functional methods are used to study expository texts from Russian textbooks on Social Sciences and Physics for secondary school. It has been found that presupposition is most often expressed through modal constructions referring to a reader (personal pronouns) occupying an initial or non-initial position in the text. The didactic function of the expressed presupposition is to actualize the reader’s knowledge necessary for text comprehension. At the same time, the expressed presupposition allows presenting a model of knowledge and a knowledge-building process by mapping a knowledge structure. The expressed presupposition represents the epistemic relations (1) between the familiar and unfamiliar parts of disciplinary knowledge and (2) between familiar parts of everyday life and unfamiliar disciplinary knowledge. The expressed presupposition presents the knowledge-building process by affecting the text deployment. The initial presupposition can occur as a global topic sentence expressing the most significant referents and determining the thematic text structure. Also, the initial presupposition can convey familiar segments of knowledge and set an information context to introduce unfamiliar significant referents in the following sentences. The non-initial presupposition expands the information context and tends to elaborate and detail the topic. To conclude, there is a correlation between the text-deployment potential of the expressed presupposition and the epistemic potential of the familiar knowledge.
Keywords
expository text,
knowledge,
presupposition,
didactic communication,
text grammarAuthors
Trushchelev Pavel N. | The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia | paveltrue2007@rambler.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Бондарко А. В. Глагольные категории в системе функциональной грамматики. М.: ЯСК, 2017. 336 с.
Глинка Е. В. Система глаголов восприятия, мышления и говорения: Дис. … канд. филол. наук / Орл. гос. пед. ун-т. Орел, 2003. 264 с.
Золотова Г. А., Онипенко Н. К., Сидорова М. Ю. Коммуникативная грамматика русского языка. М.: Ин-т рус. яз., 2004. 544 с.
Карчаева С. Х., Аликаев Р. С. Дискурсивность научно-учебных текстов // Вестник Пятигор. гос. лингвист. ун-та. 2010. № 2. С. 93-96.
Норман Б. Ю. Прагматический аспект грамматики славянских языков // Вестник Моск. гос. ун-та. Сер. 9. Филология. 2009. № 5. С. 76-85.
Падучева Е. В. Презумпция // Русская корпусная грамматика. 2011. URL: http://rusgram.ru/Презумпция (дата обращения 04.05.2021).
Самоделкин А. А. Тема-рематическая иерархия текста // Филологические науки. 2016. № 7, ч. 3. C. 132-138.
Сичинава Д. В. Несовершенный вид // Русская корпусная грамматика. 2013. URL: http://rusgram.ru/Несовершенный_вид#313 (дата обращения 04.05.2021).
Токарева П. В. Коммуникативные стратегии и тактики в современном учебном дискурсе (на материале школьных учебников): Дис. … канд. филол. наук / Ом. гос. ун-т им. Ф. М. Достоевского. Омск, 2005. 171 с.
Швец В. М. Субъективная (эпистемическая) модальность и ее выражение в детской речи // Семантические категории в детской речи / Отв. ред. С. Н. Цейтлин. СПб.: Нестор-История, 2007. С. 161-180.
Яхиббаева Л. М., Файрузова А. Р. Роль автора в порождении вторичного учебного текста // Вестник Башкир. ун-та. 2020. № 2. С. 399-404. DOI 10.33184/bulle-tin-bsu-2020.2.29
Dijk T. A. van. Discourse and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press, 2014. 400 p.
Doran Y. J. The Discourse of Physics. New York; London: Routledge, 2018. 244 p.
Givón T. On Understanding Grammar. Rev. ed. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2018. 300 p.
Martin J. R. Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning // Linguistics and Education. 2013. No. 24. P. 23-37. DOI 10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.006
Martin J. R. Revisiting Field: Specialized Knowledge in Secondary School Science and Humanities Discourse // ONOMÁZEIN. 2017. Spec. iss.: SFL. P. 111-148. DOI 10.7764/onomazein.sfl.05
Maton K. Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building // Linguistics and Education. 2013. No. 24. P. 8-22. DOI 10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005
Maton K. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. New York; London: Routledge, 2014. 256 p.
Maton K., Chen R. Ts.-H. Specialization Codes: knowledge, knowers and student success // Accessing Academic Discourse / Ed. by J. R. Martin, K. Maton, Y. J. Doran. London; New York, 2020. P. 35-58. DOI 10.4324/9780429280726-2
Pipalova R. On the Global Textual Theme and Other Textual Hyperthemes // Linguistica Pragensia. 2005. Vol. 15, no. 2. P. 57-87.
Reich U. Presupposed modality // Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond / Ed. by M. García. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2018. P. 203-228. DOI 10.1075/slcs.201.07rei
Romoli J., Sauerland U. Presupposition and accommodation // Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics / Ed. by A. Barron, Yu. Gu, G. Steen. London; New York: Routledge, 2017. P. 257-276.
Rose D. Building a pedagogic metalanguage // Accessing Academic Discourse / Ed. by J. R. Martin, K. Maton, Y. J. Doran. London; New York: Routledge, 2020. P. 236-267. DOI 10.4324/9780429280726-9
Vallduví E. Information structure // The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics / Ed. by M. Aloni, P. Dekker. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press, 2016. P. 728-755. DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139236157.024
Vera E. R. Textbooks and Education // The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies / Ed. by E. Fuchs, A. Bock. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. P. 103-114. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53142-1_7
Weatherson B., Egan A.Introduction: Epistemic Modals and Epistemic Modality // Epistemic Modality / Ed. by A. Egan, B. Weatherson. New York: Oxford Uni. Press, 2011. P. 1-18. DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0001