Does the Forest Nenets language as spoken in Khalyasavey village exhibit phonological accent? | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2025. № 3. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/92/13

Does the Forest Nenets language as spoken in Khalyasavey village exhibit phonological accent?

This paper investigates whether the Forest Nenets language, in particular the Khalyasavey village dialect, possesses a unique colloquial accent and determines whether it has prosodically emphasized vowels. In order to answer these questions, an analysis was conducted on the duration and intensity of vowels in the field recordings from the village of Khalyasavey in 2012. The analysis indicated that the duration and intensity occasionally distinguish syllables, suggesting the absence of classical stress in contemporary Forest Nenets. Nevertheless, the different marking of maximal intensity between long and short high Proto-Nenets vowels was established. Simultaneously, their function extends to indicating different syllables within separate pronunciations by the same speaker. Generally, the vowel in the initial syllable is characterized by the maximum intensity, with the exception of words containing a short ĭ in the first syllable and about half of the words containing a short ŭ. The maximum duration, however, often indicates the open vowel of the second syllable. It is noteworthy that M. K. Amelina describes an analogous prosodic system for the Gydan dialect of the Tundra Nenets language. A parallel phenomenon, namely the concentration of maximum intensity on the initial syllable in most word forms, is likewise evident in other languages of this area. The observed absence of phonological stress in Forest Nenets may be attributable to the areal process of intensity fixation on the first syllable.

Download file
Counter downloads: 4

Keywords

Forest Nenets, field research, stress, experimental phonetics, duration, intensity

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Normanskaja Julia V.Ivannikov’s Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Linguistic of the Russian Academy of Sciencesjulianor@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Амелина М. К. Ударение в непроизводных именах с однородным вокалическим составом в гыданском диалекте тундрового ненецкого языка. Часть I. Фонетические слова с гласными нижнего и среднего подъемов // Урало-алтайские исследования 2017. № 3 (26). С. 7-116.
Амелина М. К. Ударение в непроизводных именах с однородным вокалическим составом в гыданском диалекте тундрового ненецкого языка. Часть II. Фонетические слова с гласными верхнего подъема // Урало-алтайские исследования 2018. № 4 (31). С. 7-78.
Вербов Г. Д. Диалект лесных ненцев // Самодийский сборник. Новосибирск, 1973. С. 3-190.
Норманская Ю. В. Реконструкция прауральского разноместного ударения и его влияние на развитие систем вокализма. М.: Языки народов мира, 2018. 503 с.
Попова Я. Н. Ненецко-русский словарь. Лесное наречие. Szeged, 1978. 152 c. (Studia Uralo-Altaica, 12).
Ackerman F., Salminen T. Nenets // Encyclopedia of language & linguistics. 2nd ed. Editor-in-chief Keith Brown. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. Vol. 8. P. 577-579.
Burkova S. I. Nenets // Bakró-Nagy M., Laakso J., Skribnik E. (eds.). The Oxford Guide to the Uralic languages. Oxford, 2022. 1115 p.
Lehtisalo T. Juraksamojedisches Wörterbuch. Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae XIII. Helsinki, 1956. 603 S.
Salminen T. Tundra Nenets inflection // Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 227. Helsinki, 1997. 155 p.
Salminen T. Notes on Forest Nenets phonology // Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 253. Helsinki, 2007. P. 349-372.
Sammallahti P. Material from Forest Nenets. Helsinki, 1974. 140 p. (Castrenianumin toimitteita, 2).
 Does the Forest Nenets language as spoken in Khalyasavey village exhibit phonological accent? | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2025. № 3. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/92/13

Does the Forest Nenets language as spoken in Khalyasavey village exhibit phonological accent? | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2025. № 3. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/92/13

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 40