Counterfactual narratives and the problem of the receptive event in the short story “Ruchka, nozhka, ogurechik…” by Yu. Dombrovsky | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2026. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/94/10

Counterfactual narratives and the problem of the receptive event in the short story “Ruchka, nozhka, ogurechik…” by Yu. Dombrovsky

Narrative includes not only events that occur within a storyworld but also those that only could have occurred. These “possible” events are incorporated into the narrative progression and shape the reader’s experience. Such events, which are subsequently contradicted or conflict with the plot’s trajectory, are defined by researcher Hilary Dannenberg as counterfactual. This article examines counterfactual narratives through an analysis of Yuri Dombrovsky’s short story “Ruchka, nozhka, ogurechik…” (“Little arm, leg, cucumber…”; 1977). These narratives problematize the sphere of actual events by blurring the distinction between the historical and the potential. Consequently, the “possible” at the plot level is experienced by readers as “actually happened.” They invite the reader to complete a narrative that appears inherently incomplete. At the representational level, the effect of realism is enhanced by a metonymic writing style and an appeal to the reader’s sensory experience. In the story, the “possible” takes priority over “what actually happened,” preventing the reader from fully determining the protagonist’s fate. Simultaneously, this “potentiality” displaces actual events, illustrating a loss of control over one’s life, fears, and imagination. This effect is achieved through affective amplification created by expanding counterfactual lines. Paradoxically, these counterfactual events do not appear counterfactive to the reader. Instead, the narrative is recognized as prophetically foretelling the author’s actual death.

Download file
Counter downloads: 2

Keywords

counterfactuality, virtual event, alternate possible worlds, virtual voice, reception event, Yuri Dombrovsky

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Shulyatyeva Dina V.HSE Universitydshulyatyeva@hse.ru
Всего: 1

References

Барт Р. Введение в структурный анализ повествовательных текстов / Пер. Г. К. Косикова // Зарубежная эстетика и теория литературы XIX-XX вв.: трактаты, статьи, эссе. М.: МГУ, 1987. С. 387-422.
Милич С. Виртуальный нарратив как повествовательная альтернатива // Narratorium. 2017. № 1 (10). URL: https://narratorium.ru/2018/04/03/ (дата обращения 15.05.2024).
Якобсон Р. О. Два аспекта языка и два типа афатических нарушений // Теория метафоры: Сб. / Под ред. Н. Д. Арутюновой, М. А. Журинской. М.: Прогресс, 1990. С. 110-133.
Bruner J. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MА: Harvard Uni. Press, 1986. 222 p.
Chion M. The Voice in Cinema. New York: Columbia Uni. Press, 1999. 208 p.
Dannenberg H. Coincidence and Counterfactuality: Plotting Time and Space in Narrative Fiction. Lincoln: Uni. of Nebraska Press, 2008. 304 p.
Grishakova M.Interface Ontologies: On the Possible, Virtual, and Hypothetical in Fiction // Bell A., Ryan M.-L. (eds.). Possible Worlds Theory and Contemporary Narratology. Uni. of Nebraska Press, 2019. P. 88-110.
Hühn P. Functions and Forms of Eventfulness in Narrative Fiction // Pier J., García Landa J. Á. (eds.). Theorizing Narrativity. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008. P. 141-163.
Ryan M.-L. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: Uni. of Indiana Press, 1991. 291 p.
Ryan M.-L. Virtuality // Herman D., Jahn M., Ryan M.-L. (eds.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Routledge, 2005. P. 627-629.
 Counterfactual narratives and the problem of the receptive event in the short story “Ruchka, nozhka, ogurechik…” by Yu. Dombrovsky | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2026. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/94/10

Counterfactual narratives and the problem of the receptive event in the short story “Ruchka, nozhka, ogurechik…” by Yu. Dombrovsky | Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal - Siberian Journal of Philology. 2026. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/94/10

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 11