Reciprocity in Intergenerational Mutual Aid: Students' Opinion | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 470. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/470/13

Reciprocity in Intergenerational Mutual Aid: Students' Opinion

The article examines family social assistance relations. Researchers give ambiguous assessments of the nature of intergenerational relationships of mutual assistance between parents and their adult children who are students. Therefore, the research aim is to determine the nature of the relationship of family-related assistance in families with student children and the impact on family assistance of the type of (joint or separate) residence of children with parents. The methodological basis of the research was the developments of the theory of reciprocity by B. Malinovsky and K. Polanyi, the concept of social assistance by N. Luhmann, as well as works of leading foreign and Russian scholars. The research was conducted on the basis of a set of general scientific methods of systems analysis, generalization and systematization, comparison, and a questionnaire. The empirical basis of the research is a survey of 300 students and 12 individual semi-structured interviews of students of the Ural State University of Economics, held in 2020. The survey and interview data were analyzed to identify the nature and motivations of family assistance in families with student children, as well as the influence of the factor of joint or separate residence of children with parents. The study shows that the relationship of family assistance in families with student children is interdependent, symmetrical, and nonequivalent, that is, based on the principle of reciprocity. A person's motivation for family assistance forms under the influence of a situation objectively perceived as requiring the support of a family member and the potential helper's readiness to assist and the person helped to be assisted. Students' support for their parents is based on non-economic motives that reflect family solidarity, feelings of reciprocity and commitment. The factor of separate or joint residence of parents and student children affects the relationship of family assistance. Thus, in families where student children live together with their parents, a higher level of intergenerational mutual assistance is established. In these families, parents and student children are much more likely to help each other on a regular, permanent basis; children are more likely to provide parents with financial assistance, emotional and psychological support, assistance in caring for parents and in household management. Material, emotional and psychological support from parents is at a high level, regardless of the type of residence.

Download file
Counter downloads: 44

Keywords

reciprocity, intergenerational relations, family assistance, children-students, nature of support, motivation of assistance, cohabitation and separation

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Sharin Valery I.Ural State University of Economicssharin_vi@usue.ru
Всего: 1

References

Реутов Е.В., Реутова М.Н., Шавырина И.В. Реципрокность в сетях взаимопомощи (на материалах регионального исследования) // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 3. С. 106-116.
Malinowski B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922.
Polanyi K. The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. New York : Farrar & Rinehart, 1944.
Луман Н. Формы помощи в процессе изменения общественных условий // Социологический журнал. 2000. № 1-2. С. 016-039.
Майерс Д. Социальная психология. СПб. : Питер, 2011.
Komter A., Vollebergh W. Solidarity in Dutch families - family ties under strain? // Journal of Family Issues. 2002. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 171-188.
Klaus D. Why do adult children support their parents? // Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2009. Vol. 40, № 2. P. 227-233.
Уэллман Б. Место родственников в системе личных связей // Социологические исследования. 2000. № 6. С. 78-87.
Cox D., Soldo B. Motives for care that adult children provide to parents: evidence from «Point Blank» survey questions // Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2013. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 491-502.
Van den Broek Th., Dykstra P.A., Van den Veen R.J. Adult children stepping in? Long-term care reforms and trends in children's provision of household support to impaired parents in the Netherlands // Ageing & Society. 2019. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 112-137.
Hank K., Kreyenfeld М. A multilevel analysis of child care and women's fertility decisions in Western Germany // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2003. № 65 (3). P. 584-596.
Судьин С.А., Кутявина Е.Е., Курамшев А.В. Межпоколенные отношения в современной нижегородской семье // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Социально-экономические науки. 2018. № 3. С. 56-71.
Прохорова М.В. Взаимодействие поколений в семье и обществе: резюме доклада о поколениях в Швейцарии // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. Серия: Социальные науки. 2012. № 2 (26). С. 52-62.
Котликофф Л., Бернс С. Пенсионная система перед бурей: То, что нужно знать каждому о финансовом будущем своей страны. М. : ИРИСЭН, Мысль, 2011.
Gray P.B., Longkumer W., Panda S. Grandparenting in urban Bangalore, India : support and involvement from the standpoint of young adult university students // Sage Open. 2019. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 167-174.
Zhu Sh., Li M., Zhong R. The effects of co-residence on the subjective well-being of older Chinese parents // Sustainability. 2019. Vol. 11, № 7. P. 173-182.
Барсукова С.Ю. Сетевая взаимопомощь российских домохозяйств: теория и практика экономики дара // Мир России. Социология. Этнология. 2003. № 2. С. 81-121
Касаркина Е.Н., Бистяйкина А.В., Соловьева Т.В. Семья как субъект социальной защиты: социологический анализ // Дискуссия. 2013. № 11 (41). С. 72-77.
Прохорова Э.М., Фадеева Ю.В., Фодоря А.Ю. Социальный институт взаимопомощи в современной молодой семье Подмосковья // Сервис Plus. 2011. № 1. С. 28-36.
Коломасова Е.Н. Институт помощи в системе семейно-родственных отношений : дис.. канд. социол. наук. Саранск, 2005.
Шарин В.И., Кулькова И.А. Влияние помощи старшего поколения на рождаемость в России // Народонаселение. 2019. № 2. С. 40-51.
Лылова О.В. Неформальная взаимопомощь в сельском сообществе // Социологические исследования. 2002. № 2. С. 2-8.
Миронова А. А. Родственная межпоколенная солидарность в России // Социологические исследования. 2014. № 10. С. 136-142.
Реутова М.Н. Обмен ресурсами в сетях взаимопомощи: реализация принципа реципрокности // Дискурс. 2018. № 4 (18). С. 177-187.
Бурмыкина О.Н. Динамика представлений петербургских студентов о семье и межпоколенных отношениях (2007-2017 гг.) // Петербургская социология сегодня. 2018. № 9. С. 27-46.
Попова Л.А. Межпоколенческие отношения в современной российской семье. Настоящее и будущее семьи в меняющемся мире. М. : Экон-Информ, 2015.
 Reciprocity in Intergenerational Mutual Aid: Students' Opinion | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 470. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/470/13

Reciprocity in Intergenerational Mutual Aid: Students' Opinion | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 470. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/470/13

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 515