Public private partnership: international experience and domestic practice | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2014. № 386. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/386/29

Public private partnership: international experience and domestic practice

Constructive interaction between government and business is essential for the optimal functioning and sustained economic development of the region and the country as a whole. Public-private partnership is a legally and institutionally fixed system of relations between the state or municipal authority and the private sector for developing socially significant and underdeveloped sectors of national economy to protect the public interest. The system is based on the principles of equality of power between partners, management, risk and income allocation, bringing together public and private sector. The acquired methodological apparatus in the world practice of patterns, forms and mechanisms of public-private partnership allows its use in various sectors of the economy when addressing a number of important tasks of the current socio-economic policy of Russia. As a rule, these relations have developed in the field of production and social infrastructure. This included roads, railways, airports, seaports, power networks, telecommunications, public utilities, education, health care and culture institutions. It is typical that this kind of relations resulted from the policies of liberalization and reduction of the state's involvement in the economy. The recent global economic crisis has led to a strengthening of the public-private partnership in all branches and sectors of the economies of the developed countries. But progress is especially serious in the sectors of production infrastructure - transport communications, energy networks, systems of housing and utility services. Unlike other countries, the Russian government during the crisis sharply reduced its investment in the production infrastructure. Currently, the largest in terms of capital investment are public-private partnership projects in the field of transport infrastructure. A recognized leader among the regions of the Russian Federation in the development of public-private partnership is St. Petersburg. The experience of the developed countries and the Russian practice in the use of public-private partnerships in general seem to confirm the effectiveness and viability of the use of this format of cooperation between the state and the business, especially in infrastructure projects.

Download file
Counter downloads: 176

Keywords

Russian practice, international experience, public-private partnership, российская практика, мировой опыт, государственно-частное партнерство

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kazakov Vladimir V.Tomsk State Universityprorektorsv@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Стенограмма заседания Президиума Правительства РФ 12 января 2009 г. URL: http://premier.gov.ru/events/news 2970
China plans 10 major steps to enlarge the domestic demand with 4 trillion yuan investment // China Financial Daily. 10.11.2008.
Государство и бизнес: институциональные аспекты. М. : ИМЭМО РАН, 2006. С. 40.
New private infrastructure projects in developing countries continue to take place but projects are being affected by the financial crisis. / World Bank. Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF). Wash. D.C. 05.03.2009. 7 p.
Korean BTL. Ministry of strategy and finance. 31 p.
Jay-Hyung Kim. Managing PPP in Korea: an institutional set-up using a think tank institution. 2009. 25 p.
Public-private partnerships in infrastructure in Korea. Ministry of strategy and finance. 30 p.
Assessment of the impact of the crisis on new PPI projects - Update 3 - World Bank Group. Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility. Wash. D.C. June 2009. 8 p.
Hall D. A crisis for public-private partnerships (PPPs)? // PSIRU. 2009. January. 9 p.
Burger P., Tyson J., Karpowicz I., Coelho M.D. The Effects of the Financial Crisis on Public-Private Partnerships // IMF Working Paper. 2009. July. 25 p.
Edward Farquharson. Partnerships UK. December 2008. 12 p.
HM Treasury. URL: http: // www.hm-treasury.gov. uk/ррр_ tifu_index.htm
Recovery.gov. URL: http://www.recoverv.gov/Pages/home. aspx?q=content/investments
Об опыте государственно-частного партнерства в США // Государственно-частное партнерство в России. 2012. URL: http://www.pppinrussia.ru/userfiles/upload/files/PPP%20in%20foring%20country/PPP_USA.pdf
Никонова Я.И. Инновационная политика в системе государственного регулирования устойчивого развития национальной экономики / под общ. ред. А.Г. Ивасенко. Новосибирск : Изд-во НГТУ, 2010. 260 с.
Farrugia Christine, Tim Reynolds and Ryan Orr. Public-private partnership agencies: a global perspective // CRGP Working paper. August 2008. № 39. 43 p.
Бузгалин А.В., Колганов А.И. Экономическая компаративистика. М. : Инфра-М, 2009. 746 с.
Кейнс Дж.М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. Избранное. М. : Эксмо, 2007. 960 с.
Keynes J.M. The End of Laissez-Faire. London, 1927.
Казаков В.В. Отдельные организационно-правовые вопросы финансового обеспечения в реализации органами местного самоуправления отдельных государственных полномочий // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2012. № 365. С. 101-107.
 Public private partnership: international experience and domestic practice | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2014. № 386. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/386/29

Public private partnership: international experience and domestic practice | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2014. № 386. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/386/29

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 719