The principles of communicative and dynamic presentation of the Russian dialogic text

The principles of communicative and dynamic presentation of the dialogue text is the subject of discussion in this article. The formal (static) model describing the dialogic text that dominated in the 1940s - 1980s are declarative, as language may be represented statically in the cognition theory only, they have no explanatory power and cannot claim for an ontologically adequate cognition of the object of study. The basic principles of cognitive-communicative presentation of the dialogic text are discussed in the paper: (1) the principle of communicative situation asymmetry as a condition of the dialogic text organization, (2) the principle of the priority of the content over the form, (3) the principle of communicative motivation, (4) the principle of the purposefulness of text formation, (5) the principle of limited type boundaries of the dialogic text. These principles can be a methodological basis of a cognitive-communicative approach to text formation. The proposed model of the dialogic text explains the speech behavior of native speakers in a particular - visual - communicative situation of a dialogic type. The degree of interpretability of the cognitive-communicative dialogic text representation is determined by the analysis of the observed communicative situation focused on the dialogic text creation. However, this model does not explain the communicative dynamics of the dialogic text, determined by its form, the structural organization, rather than by the content of the original utterance. With regard to the adequacy of the model, it should be said that this model describes the verbal behavior of the sender, and does not pay attention to the verbal behavior of the recipient who focuses on the form of the original utterance when making a response, which finds confirmation in the surface organization of the recipient's utterance, and expresses his or her attitude to the stimulus utterance. The adequacy of cognitive-communicative modeling of the dialogic text is determined by its application to the explanation of the fact of the formal and content coherence of its (text) structural components in the primacy of content (meaning, including illocutionary one) coherence. This model does not explain the fact of dialogic citation described by N.D Arutyunova, according to which the process of creating a second utterance is associated with dialogic immanentization of the external form of the recipient's text in the text of the sender, which is confirmed by the appearance of secondary modus predicates connecting the two utterances of the dialogic text at the level of the external form.

Keywords

Authors

References