Legislation of the Russian Empire on criminal liability for the organization of a terrorist community or participation therein | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2016. № 407.

Legislation of the Russian Empire on criminal liability for the organization of a terrorist community or participation therein

In the article, the author analyzes standards of the criminal legislation of the Russian Empire which provided liability for the organization of terrorist community and participation therein. The author notes that the Code of Criminal and Corrective Penalties of 1845 provided criminal liability for the organization and participation in illegal (secret) communities. However, beyond the scope of participation there was an activity of illegal communities which accumulated efforts of many persons for commission of terrorist crimes. The author considers that distribution of terrorist ideas was promoted by the not-guilty verdict of the jury in the case of Vera Zasulich. The court qualified the actions of Zasulich, who attempted the life of St. Petersburg mayor F.F. Trepov, not as an act of terrorism, but as a general crime, which allowed to hear the case by the jury. As a result, the actions of Zasulich were recognized as public opinion and justice, as revenge for the illegal actions of F.F. Trepov concerning a prisoner, and the defendant was acquitted. As a result, the ideology that admitted murder as a normal means of struggle with the government to achieve political and social goals received broad support not only in revolutionary circles, but also at the level of society. The author also notes that the source of funding for terrorist communities (organizations) at the time was the special services of countries competing with Russia, which was one of the main reasons for the establishment and activities of such terrorist communities. Analyzing the causes of terrorism in the Russian Empire, the author notes that the responsibility for the victims of terrorism was on the society as a whole, since it made heroes of the killers, provided them with moral support for three decades. The author cites data according to which liberal tendencies also covered judicial practice regarding crimes committed by members of terrorist communities. According to Article 126 of the Criminal Code of 1903, the punishment for participation in the community that aimed to overthrow the social system existing in the state, or to commit serious crimes by means of explosives or shells was hard labor for up to 8 years or an exile. Thus, for a long time criminal liability for the organization a terrorist community and participation therein came from articles on illegal (secret) communities. However, Article 126 of the Criminal Code of 1903 classified participation in a terrorist community as a separate corpus delicti on the basis of the fact that terrorist communities used a special way of crime commission.

Download file
Counter downloads: 228

Keywords

террористическое сообщество, противозаконное сообщество, террористическая организация, общественная опасность, уголовная ответственность, terrorist community, illegal community, terrorist organization, public danger, criminal liability

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Matyushov Andrey M.Tomsk State Universityamatyushov92@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Шеслер А.В., Смирнов И.О. Уголовно-правовая характеристика организации незаконного вооруженного формирования или участия в нем. М. : Юрлитинформ, 2016. 192 с.
Кириенко Н.А. Краткий исторический экскурс в законодательном определении организованной преступности в России XVII-XXI вв. // Власть и управление на востоке России. 2012. № 4. С. 128-138.
Уложение о наказаниях уголовных и исправительных // Российское законодательство Х-ХХ веков : в 9 т. Юрид. лит., 1988. Т. 6. 432 с.
Федоров В.А. История России. 1861-1917 : учеб. 2-е изд., испр. М. : Высш. шк., 2003. 383 с.
Зиновьев В.П., Топчий А.Т. «Бердский бунт» 1869 г. // Проблемы истории дореволюционной Сибири. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1989. С. 188-198.
Будницкий О.В. Терроризм в Российском освободительном движении: идеология, этика, психология (вторая половина XIX - начало XX в.) / ред. Б.С. Итенберг. М. : РОССПЭН, 2000. 396 с.
Высочайше утвержденное мнение Государственного Совета, распубликованное 14 апреля, «О противозаконных сообществах» 1867. марта // ПСЗ-2. СПб., 1871. T. XLII. Отд. 1 № 44402. С. 329-331.
Высочайше утвержденное мнение Госсовета «О наказаниях за составление противозаконных сообществ и участие в оных». 1874. июня // ПСЗ-2. СПб., 1876. Т. XLIX. Отд. 1. № 53606. С. 851-854.
Суд присяжных в России: громкие уголовные процессы 1864-1917 гг. / сост. С.М. Казанцев. Л. : Лениздат, 1991. 510 с.
Стариков Н.В. Кто финансирует развал России?: от декабристов до моджахедов. СПб. : Питер, 2010. 285 с.
Степняк-Кравчинский С.М. Грозовая Туча России: Смерть за смерть. Подпольная Россия. М. : Новый Ключ, 2001. 478 с.
Революционное народничество 70-х годов XIX века. Т. II: 1876-1882 гг. / под ред. С.С. Волка. М. ; Л. : Наука, 1965. 472 с.
Политическая полиция и политический терроризм в России (вторая половина XIX - начало XX в.) : сб. документов / сост. В.И. Кочанов. М. : Аиро-XX: Ушаков, 2001. 520 с.
Убийство Столыпина. Свидетельства и документы / сост. А. Серебренников. Нью-Йорк : Телекс, 1991. 333 с.
Гейфман А. А. Революционный террор в России, 1894-1917 / пер. с англ. Е. Дорман. 1997. 448 с.
Савинков Б. Воспоминания террориста / сост. В.Е. Кельнер. Л. : Лениздат, 1990. 445 с.
 Legislation of the Russian Empire on criminal liability for the organization of a terrorist community or participation therein | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2016. № 407.

Legislation of the Russian Empire on criminal liability for the organization of a terrorist community or participation therein | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2016. № 407.

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 983