The role of the UN in the new world order | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2017. № 417. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/417/11

The role of the UN in the new world order

The subject of this study is the "new world order" as a key concept reflecting the nature of contemporary international relations, as well as ways of representing this category in the postmodernist historical narrative at the turn of the 21st century. The author points to various interpretations of the "new world order" concept, caused by the difference in the socio-cultural, civilizational and geopolitical researchers' optics. The multi-semantic nature of Postmodernity as a special stage in the world system development is aggravated not only with the ideological depth of this concept, but also with the heterogeneity and confrontation of theoretical and methodological orientations of the authors and their discursive practices. The substantial core of the debate about the contemporary international system nature was formed by the "democratic peace", "cooperative security" and multiculturalism concepts. The main author's objective was to study the United Nations evolution as the new world order institutional and regulatory basis. In its overview, the author specified the features of different approaches to the assessment of the UN and its role in the new world order, determined both by the objective changes in the international security agenda and by the nature of researchers' political discourse within the postmodern paradigm. The author's methodology involves the integration of historical, political and legal approaches to the study of the new world order configuration and the UN's place in it. As a result, the author made the following conclusions. The concept of the "new world order" entered the lexicon of the international relations history at the turn of the 21st century to refer to the transitional stage of the world community development - from the Cold War confrontation to constructive interaction for the sake of peace, progress and global security. The main load-bearing structure in the architecture of the new "post-bipolar" world became multilateral diplomacy institutions and, above all, the United Nations as the only universal international organization capable to serve as not only a global security guarantor, but also the organ of global governance and the main new world designer. Evolution of the Organization powers, structures, agenda and functions for more than the 70-year period of its history made the UN a transitional type organization. Inclusion in its structure of sovereign and non-sovereign actors of the new world order (represented by nongovernmental international organizations, multinational and regional communities, civil society institutions) allows the Organization to involve in the changing world politics agenda and to perform effectively its traditional and new functions.

Download file
Counter downloads: 201

Keywords

демократический транзит, ООН, новый мировой порядок, глобальное управление, эпоха Постмодерни-ти, международные отношения, democracy transition, United Nations, International law, New World Order, global governance, Postmodernity

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Ivonina Olga I.Novosibirsk State Pedagogical Universityivonina@ngs.ru
Всего: 1

References

Ивонина О.И. Транзитивность как предмет исторического дискурса // Социальные взаимодействия в транзитивном обществе / отв. ред. М.В. Удальцова. Новосибирск, 2000. С. 14-30.
Crawford G. The World Bank and Good Governance: Rethinking the State of consolidating Neo-Liberalism? // The IMF, World Bank and Policy Reform. New York, 2006. 356 р.
Ивонина О.И. Конфликт и консенсус в американской теории международных отношений рубежа веков // Историческое знание в системе политики и культуры : материалы IV Междунар. науч. ист. чтений памяти профессора В. А. Козюченко / под ред. Е.Г. Блосфельд. Волгоград : Перемена, 2005. С. 56-62.
Slaughter A.-M. Security, Solidarity and Sovereignty: The Grand Themes of UN Reform // American Journal of international Law. 2005. Vol. 99, July. Р. 619-631.
Ikenberry J. After Victory. Institutions, Strategic restraint and Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2001. 312 p.
Ивонин Ю.П., Ивонина О.И. Левиафан в поисках миропорядка. Проблема международной безопасности в работах Т. Гоббса и И. Канта // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2016. № 407. С. 78-88.
Ивонин Ю.П., Ивонина О.И. Проблема международной безопасности в политической теории И. Канта // Вестник НГУЭУ. 2014. № 3. С. 258-268.
Glennon M.J. Why the Security Council Failed? // Foreign Affairs. 2003. Vol. 82, № 3, May-June. Р. 16-35.
Status in World Politics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014. 324 р.
Глобальные вопросы повестки дня ООН. URL: www.un.org/ru/globalissues/index.shtml (дата обращения: 27.02.2017).
Предполагаемые стратегические рамки на период 2016-2017 годов. URL: https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CCPCJ/ CCPCJ_Sessions/CCPCJ_23/_A-69-6-Prog13/A-69-6-Prog13_R.pdf.
Staur G. Shared responsibility. The United Nations in the Age of Globalization. Montreal : McGill Quenn's University Press, 2013. 212 р.
Ruhlman M. Who participates in Global Governance? States, bureaucracies and NGO in the United Nations. London ; New York : Routledge, 2015. 176 р.
 The role of the UN in the new world order | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2017. № 417. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/417/11

The role of the UN in the new world order | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2017. № 417. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/417/11

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3344