Globalization processes: analysis and concepts
The aim of the paper is to see how the change of discourse on globalization might enlighten the formation of a new ontology of world order. The main methods of the authors' analysis are connected with the interdisciplinary approach to globalization, comparative studies, philosophical analysis of globalization. During the investigation of globalization issues within sciences like economics, international relations, social sciences, sociology, political sciences, legal sciences, philosophy, the authors came to the following conclusions: 1. The first period of globalization issues in the 1990s is connected with the interdisciplinary analysis of globalization in various sciences: economic, political, social, etc. Globalization was rather a neglected topic in philosophy in this period. The analysis of globalization issues shows that theoretical debates in this period have different appraisals: from negative assessment of globalization to fascination for globalization. In most recent theoretical debates, two trends of investigation of this process arise: globalization on the basis of the idea of progress which leads to a homogeneous world (universalism), and globalization on the basis of representation of the world's real diversity (multiculturalism). Analysis of the main concepts of globalization provides the basis for the authors' classification of interpretations of globalization: historical concepts, economical concepts, social concepts, political concepts, legal concepts. The authors' conclusion is that the first period of discourse on globalization represents fragmentary comprehension of globalization. 2. The authors identified the second period of globalization analysis which is concerned with the philosophical analysis of contemporary network globalization. Global network organizations are a new type of a network structure based on the network of political institutions and on the network of international, national, local institutions of decision making. Individualization and decentralization are opposite to the socialization of work, vertical integration, big production which characterized industrial society's hierarchical forms of organization and interaction. Contemporary network organizations guarantee the flexibility of firms, individuals, countries in the conditions of globalization. The global network society phenomenon represents not only a new type of a network organization, but a new ontology of world order, transforming the present ideas of the reality. In the authors' opinion, this creates the opportunity for the formation of a new philosophical thinking - thinking without the subject, based on the analysis of network representation of the reality. Network globalization concepts open new perspectives for the philosophical analysis of globalization as a new ontology of world order.
Keywords
network structure,
global network community,
global community,
globalization,
сетевые структуры,
глобальное сетевое общество,
глобальное сообщество,
глобализацияAuthors
| Korobeynikova Larisa A. | Tomsk State University | larisa_korobeynikova@rambler.ru |
| Gil Aleksandra Yu. | Tomsk State University | gil_iik@mail.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Mann M. Has globalization ended the rise and the rise of nation-state // D. Held and A. McGrew (eds). The Global Transformation Reader. Cambridge : Polity Press, 2000. P. 105.
Хабермас Ю. Демократия. Разум. Нравственность. М. : Academia, 1995. C. 74.
Fukuyama F. Social Capital and Civil Society. The Institute of Public Rolicy. George Mayson Univer. 1999. October 1. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/fft/seminar/1999/reforms/fukuyama.htm.
Coleman J.Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital // American Journal of Sociology. 1988. Supplement 94. P. 95-120.
Патнем Р. Чтобы демократия сработала. Гражданские традиции в современной Италии. М., 1996. URL: http://www.msps.ru/ libf/pub/putham-rv.htmc
Podolny J, Page K, Network Forms of Organization // Annual Review of Sociology. 1998. № 24. C. 57-76.
Бард А., Зодерквист Я. Netократия. Новая правящая элита и жизнь после капитализма / пер. со шведского. СПб. : Стокгольмская школа экономики в Санкт-Петербурге, 2004. 252 с.
Тоффлер А. Раса, власть и культура // Новая технократическая волна на Западе. М., 1986. 286 с.
Касельс М. Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура. М. : Blackwell, 2000. С. 195.
America Alone. The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order. Stefan Halper, University of Cambrige, and Jonathan Clarke. Cato University, Washington D.C., 2004. 382 p.
Restructuring Territoriality. Europe and the United States Compared. Edited by Christopher K. Ansell. University of California, Berkeley, 2004. 316 p.
Порядин С.В. США - лидер глобализации // Философские науки. 2001. № 2. С. 32-47.
Habermas J. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. MII Press, 1999.
Frost M. Can Dispersed Practices be Held Ethically Accountable // Global Society. 2004. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 88.
Remapping Global Politics. History's Revenge and Future Shock. Val.H. Ferguson Rutgers University New Jersey and Richard W. Mansbach : Iowa State University, 2004. 380 p.
Rizvi F. Democracy and Education after September 11 // Globalization, Societies and Education. 2003. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 33.
Held D. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1995.
Labban M. The Struggle for Heartland: Hybrid Hepolitics in the Transkaspian // Geopolitics. 2009. Vol. 14. P. 3.
Vertovec S. Transnationalism. New York : Routledge, 2010. P. 3.
Bruszt L. Multi-level Governance - the Eastern Versions: Emerging Patterns of Regional Development Governance in the New Member State // Regional and Federal Studies. 2008. Vol. 18, № 5. P. 607-627.
Globalization, Stanford Encyclopaedia, plato. Stanford. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/globalization/.
Steger M. Globalization. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009. P. 13.
Maracz L. Hybridity as a Characteristic Feature of Globalization // Globalization, Europeanization and other Transnational Phenomena. Description, Analyses and Generalization. Budapest, 2011. P. 14-31.
Magalhaes A. and Stoer S. Performance, Citizenship and the Knowledge Society: a New Mandate for European Education Policy // Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2003. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 63.
Brzezinski J. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives. N.V. : Basik Books, A Division Collins Publishers, 1997. P. 28-29.
Eisenstadt Sh. Multiple Modernities in the Age of Globalization. Jenisalem : The Hebrew University, 1998. P. 6.
Парсонс Т. Понятие общества: компоненты и их взаимоотношения // Thesis. Теория и история экономических и социальных институтов и систем. 1993. С. 115.
Donna Gabaccia. A Long Atlantic in a Wider World // Atlantic Studies. Literary, Cultural and Historical Perspectives. 2004. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 9-10.
Ritzer G. The Macdonaldization of Society. An Investigation into Changing Character, of Contemporary Social Life. Thousand Oaks. California ; London ; New Delhi : Pine ForgePress, 1996.
Покровский Н.Е. Неизбежность странного мира: включение России в глобальное сообщество // Журнал социологии и социальной антро пологии. 2000. № 3. С. 26.
Interview with Robert W. Cox // Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2003. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 18.
Федотова В.Г. Российское развитие в условиях глобализации // Философские науки. 2001. № 1. С. 5.
