Individual differences in the storage of perceptual semantics: An exploratory study | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2018. № 436. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/436/4

Individual differences in the storage of perceptual semantics: An exploratory study

Individual differences of cognitive processes are in the focus of today's research. Gender, age, cultural and professional experiences are considered as important factors influencing human cognition at all levels (perception, categorization, high-level cognitive processing of symbols, such as numbers or words). Embodied cognition theory considers perception and language as tightly linked systems, thus leading to the concept of perceptual semantics, i.e., the whole volume of perceptual information associated with and allowing humans to understand a particular linguistic unit. In the present study, individual differences in the storage of perceptual semantics are investigated. Perceptual semantics is understood as visual, tactile, auditory, olfactory and gustatory experiences associated with the word. A database collected in an earlier study (Miklashevsky, 2018) is used as a source of psycholinguistic data. The study is exploratory, so a preliminary hypothesis was formulated: the storage of perceptual semantics in the individual mind (i.e., when the data are averaged by a participant) should follow the same principles as at the general linguistic level (i.e., when the data are averaged by item) revealed in the earlier study (Miklashevsky, 2018). Statistical methods were used, particularly descriptive statistics, correlational analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, cluster analysis (k-means). As a result of the study, a pattern similar to a general pattern at linguistic level was revealed. Namely, individuals have the following sequence of perceptual information associated with linguistic units (volume of information, descending): visual information > tactile information > auditory information > (olfactory information = gustatory information). Similar correlation between these types of information are observed at both individual (averaged by participant) and general linguistic (averaged by word) levels. The main difference is related to auditory modality: it is associated with other modalities at the individual level (the correlations are positive), when at linguistic level no such associations or even negative associations were found (absent or negative correlations). No influence of gender on perceptive semantics was revealed. It was found that participants studying humanities give higher ratings of visual and gustatory modality than those who study technical disciplines. Two clusters were revealed: group 1 (66% of the sample), which rated visual modality lower than expected, when auditory, olfactory and gustatory modalities higher than expected; group 2 (34% of the sample) with a reversed pattern: higher ratings of visual, lower ratings of auditory, olfactory and gustatory modalities. No differences in the haptic modality are found. The results of this exploratory study might motivate future research investigating revealed regularities by using behavioral (such as reaction time measurement) and neuroimaging methods.

Download file
Counter downloads: 174

Keywords

базы данных, перцептивная семантика, воплощенное познание, индивидуальные различия, статистические методы, databases, perceptual semantics, embodied cognition, individual differences, statistical methods

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Miklashevsky Alex A.Tomsk State Universityarmanster31@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Miklashevsky A. Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables // Journal of psycholinguistic research. 2018. Т. 47, № 3. P. 641-661.
de Goede M. Gender differences in spatial cognition. - Utrecht University, 2009.
Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning // Jour nal of Experimental child psychology. 2000. Т. 77, № 4. P. 337-353.
Lawton C.A. Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety //Sex roles. 1994. Т. 30, № 11-12. P. 765-779.
Coluccia E., Louse G. Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review //Journal of environmental psychology. 2004. Т. 24, № 3. P. 329-340.
Staplin L., Lyles R.W. Age differences in motion perception and specific traffic maneuver problems // Transportation Research Record. 1991. № 1325.
Gibson S.J., Helme R.D. Age-related differences in pain perception and report // Clinics in geriatric medicine. - 2001. Т. 17, № 3. P. 433-456.
Nisbett R.E., Masuda T. Culture and point of view //Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Т. 100, № 19. P. 11163-11170.
Simonsen H.G. et al. Imageability of Norwegian nouns, verbs and adjectives in a cross-linguistic perspective //Clinical linguistics & phonetics. 2013. Т. 27, № 6-7. P. 435-446.
Миклашевский А.А. Влияние факторов пола и возраста на процессы вербального vs образного кодирования информации: экспериментальное исследование // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2015. № 401. С. 55-62.
Chobert J., Besson M. Musical expertise and second language learning // Brain Sciences. 2013. Т. 3, № 2. P. 923-940.
Yang H. et al. A longitudinal study on children's music training experience and academic development // Scientific reports. 2014. Т. 4.
Zeromskaite I. The potential role of music in second language learning: A review article // Journal of European Psychology Students. 2014. Т. 5, № 3.
Intartaglia B. et al. Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds // Scientific reports. 2017. Т. 7, № 1.
Bidelman G.M., Hutka S., Moreno S. Tone language speakers and musicians share enhanced perceptual and cognitive abilities for musical pitch: evidence for bidirectionality between the domains of language and music // PloS one. 2013. Т. 8, № 4.
Krause F. et al. Different brains process numbers differently: structural bases of individual differences in spatial and nonspatial number representations // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2014. Т. 26, № 4. P. 768-776.
Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems // Behavioral and brain sciences. 1999. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 577-660.
Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008. Vol. 59. P. 617-645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
PulvermUller F. Meaning and the brain: The neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge // Journal of Neurolinguis-tics. 2012. Vol. 25, № 5. P. 423-459.
PulvermUller F. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2013. Vol. 17, № 9. P. 458-470.
PulvermUller F., Shtyrov Y., Hauk O. Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain // Brain and language. 2009. Vol. 110, № 2. P. 81-94.
PulvermUller F., Harle M., Hummel F. Neurophysiological distinction of verb categories // Neuroreport. 2000. Vol. 11, № 12. P. 2789-2793.
PulvermUller F., Harle M., Hummel F. Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing // Brain and language. 2001. Vol. 78, № 2. P. 143-168.
PulvermUller F. Brain reflections of words and their meaning // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2001. Vol. 5, № 12. P. 517-524.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., PulvermUller, F. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex // Neuron. 2004. Vol. 41, № 2. P. 301-307.
 Individual differences in the storage of perceptual semantics: An exploratory study | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2018. № 436. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/436/4

Individual differences in the storage of perceptual semantics: An exploratory study | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2018. № 436. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/436/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2484