Speech Involvement in the Activity of a Radical Community: A Critical Discursive Study of Precedence | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2019. № 441. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/441/3

Speech Involvement in the Activity of a Radical Community: A Critical Discursive Study of Precedence

The article substantiates a critical approach to the study of speech involvement in the activities of a radical organization (evidence from "Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami"). On the example of the precedent phenomenon "ziyarat" as a means of control over society, the dependence of the use of language means on the features of the general context, the stage of inclusive impact and the form of involving interaction is shown. It is revealed that behind the rethinking of the terminology of traditional Islam there is a hidden intention to form an ideologically colored idea of religion in the audience. The analyzed contexts of the use of the "ziyarat" unit allow the authors to draw the following conclusions about the features of involvement peculiar to "Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami". (1) The semantic change of the initial element "ziyarat" can be qualified as one of the special cases of recontextualization - zero transposition, which is the transition of a religious term to the category of expression used by a socially separate group for its own purposes. (2) The polysemy of the "ziyarat" element develops along the path of conceptualizing the semantic derivation of the very situation of the work of members of the community with the primary audience. The ideas of the nature of the interaction, given the tone of the requirements to the addressee, as well as the means of designation of the primary audience, demonstrate the features of the hierarchy established in the organization. In it, authority is closely connected with the activity and directive of the agent, with his right to own and dispose of human resources, as well as his ability to purposefully create the events of ziyarat. The lack of power correlates with the passivity of the counterparty. (3) The use of the "ziyarat" item in communicative acts serves as an additional argument in favor of relations of domination. Instructing and explanatory passages serve as the leading means of realizing power. It is precisely such forms of speech influence with which, on the one hand, the behavior of the addressee, designed to carry out the ziyarat, is controlled, and, on the other hand, a certain value attitude to the undeveloped society by the organization, considered as a resource for replenishing its ranks, is formed. (4) The use of the "ziyarat" unit as a precedent phenomenon refers to the program settings of "Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami", in the light of which the construction of the caliphate is impossible without the formation of an ever-replenishing community. The status of illegality leaves a certain imprint on the attitude of the community to one of the traditional terms of Islam. In the course of regular learning interactions, it is used as a means of manipulating the consciousness, through which the necessary acts for recruiting the primary audience are sought. The essence of such manipulation consists in carrying through the language the shell of a term of a completely different meaning limiting the perception of the doctrine of Islam by the ideology of a radicalized community.

Download file
Counter downloads: 457

Keywords

критические дискурсивные исследования, речевое вовлечение, экстремизм, прецедентные феномены, реконтекстуализация, critical discourse studies, speech involvement, extremism, precedent phenomena, recontextualization

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Katyshev Pavel A.Pushkin State Russian Language Institutekatpa@rambler.ru
Osadchiy Mikhail A.Pushkin State Russian Language InstituteMAOsadchiy@pushkin.institute
Всего: 2

References

Катышев П.А., Кильдибекова Б.Е. Вовлечение с позиции риторической критики // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университе та. 2015. № 4 (64), т. 4. С. 89-96.
Baran Z. Fighting the war of ideas // Foreign Affairs. 2005. № 84 (6). Р. 68-78.
Олсон М. Логика коллективных действий. Общественные блага и теория групп. М. : Фонд экономической инициативы, 1995. 165 с.
Linell P. Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse // Text. 1998. № 18 (2). Р. 143-157.
Высоцкая И.В. Спорные вопросы теории прецедентности // Критика и семиотика. 2013. № 1 (18). С. 117-137.
Караулов Ю.Н. Русский язык и языковая личность. М. : Наука, 1987. 264 с.
Bernstein B. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996. 256 р.
Linell P. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC : Infor mation Age Publishing, 2009. 482 р.
Richardson J.E., Wodak R. Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: Right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom // Critical Discourse Studies. 2009. № 6 (4). Р. 251-267.
Bauman R., Briggs C.L. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life // Annual Review of Anthropology. 1990. № 19. Р. 59-88.
Oddo J. Precontextualization and the rhetoric of futurity: Foretelling Colin Powell's UN address on NBC News // Discourse and Communication. 2013. № 7 (1). Р. 25-53.
Hodges A. The politics of recontextualization: Discursive competition over claims of Iranian involvement in Iraq // Discourse & Society. 2008. № 19 (4). Р. 483-505.
Semino E. et al. Metaphor, Genre, and Recontextualization // Metaphor and Symbol. 2013. № 28 (1). Р. 41-59.
Смолененкова В.В. Основы риторической критики. М., 2018. 192 c.
Fairclough N.L., Wodak R. Critical discourse analysis // Discourse as Social Interaction / ed. by T.A. van Dijk. London : SAGE, 1997. Р. 258284.
Krzyzanowski M. Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies // Discourse & Society. 2016. № 27 (3). Р. 308-321.
Дейк Т.А. ван. Дискурс и власть. Репрезентация доминирования в языке и коммуникации. М. : ЛИБРОКОМ, 2013. 344 с.
Bhatia V.K. Critical genre analysis: theoretical preliminaries // Hermes - Journal of Language and Communication in Business. 2015. № 54. Р. 9-20.
Gumperz J.J. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1982. 225 р.
Chafe W.L. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature // Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy / ed. by D. Tannen. Norwood : Ablex, 1982. Р. 35-53.
Chafe W., Danielewicz J. Properties of spoken and written language // Comprehending Oral and Written Language / ed. by R. Horowitz, F.J. Samuels. N.Y. : Academic Press, 1987. Р. 83-113.
Tannen D. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007. Х. 223 р.
Besnier N. Involvement in linguistic practice: An ethnographic appraisal // Journal of Pragmatics. 1994. № 22. Р. 279-299.
Селиванова М.А. К вопросу о понятии вовлечения несовершеннолетних в совершение преступлений // Известия Байкальского государственного университета. 2010. № 2 (70). С. 146-149.
Ахмадуллин А.С. Идеология «Хизб ут-Тахрир аль-Ислами» - угроза основам конституционного строя и безопасности России // Правовое государство: проблемы понимания и реализации. Уфа : Башкирский государственный университет, 2015. Т. 1. С. 135-141.
Ahmed H., Stuart H. Hizb ut-Tahrir: Ideology and Strategy. London : The Centre for Social Cohesion, 2009. 167 р.
Karagiannis E., McCauley C. Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami: Evaluating the threat posed by a radical islamic group that remains nonviolent terrorism and political violence // Terrorism and Political Violence. 2006. № 18 (2). Р. 315-334.
Whine M. Is Hizb ut-Tahrir Changing Strategy or Tactics? Center for Eurasian Policy Occasional Research I(1). Washington, DC : Hudson Institute, 2006. 11 р.
Ислам : энциклопедия. М. : Наука, 1991. 315 с.
Хазимуллина Е.Е. Механизм речевого вовлечения в деятельность экстремистских организаций // Acta linguistica petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований РАН. 2016. Т. XII, ч. 3. С. 453-469.
Musawi M.A. Cheering for Osama: How Jihadists Use Internet Discussion Forums. London : Quilliam, 2010. 80 р.
Мардиева Л.А. Коды визуального поведения и ассоциированные с ними смыслы // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2014. № 3 (33): в 2 ч. Ч. 1. С. 126-130.
Filardo-Llamas L. Re-contextualizing political discourse // Critical Discourse Studies. 2015. № 12:3. P. 279-296.
 Speech Involvement in the Activity of a Radical Community: A Critical Discursive Study of Precedence | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2019. № 441. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/441/3

Speech Involvement in the Activity of a Radical Community: A Critical Discursive Study of Precedence | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2019. № 441. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/441/3

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2007