Noun as a Means of Prepositional Semantics Representation | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2019. № 446. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/446/3

Noun as a Means of Prepositional Semantics Representation

In the article, the interrelation of linguistic and mental units on the basis of the connection of semantics of the noun with the propositional mental structure is considered. It is shown that this connection is clearly manifested in speech in the functioning of nouns as parts of different syntactic constructions. The methodology of the research is based on the combination of component and contextological analysis of semantics of substantive and verbal lexemes in the conditions of a discursive realization of this semantics. The obtained results are interpreted in the categories of cognitive semantics based on the typology of mental units, in this case on the proposition and partly the scenario as means of knowledge organization. Taking into consideration the aspect of analysis, the understanding of the polysemantic term 'proposition' is specified in this article. Proposition is understood as a means of organizing knowledge about realities (denotation) in the aspect of its typical situational connections with other realities (denotations), that is in the categories of components of a situation - actants and adjuncts: subject, object, addressee, instrument, place, etc. The problem under study is considered on the material of nouns of different lexical grammatical and lexical semantic categories, which, being parts of different constructions, can reflect not only things (person, artifact, action, time interval, etc.), but also the situation as a whole a typical or unique element of which is the thing (subject, object, instrument, place, time) nouns denote, and the thing is capable of marking the type of the situation. The essence of this idea can be illustrated on the example of the reflection of the situation of visiting a hospital (treatment) with the help of nouns of different semantic categories that denote the person, the institution, the action, or the instrument of the action: went to the doctor - went to hospital - went for a surgery - went under the scalpel; went to the nurse - went to the treatment room - went for an injection. The difference in the semantics of the above mentioned constructions which are discursive synonyms lies in the fact that different constructions focus attention on different components of the same situation. Notwithstanding the choice of the noun, all the mentioned constructions indicate the situation as a whole, including the nature of actions, the status of the person in this action, the instrument of the action, the typical place. On the basis of the research, the conclusion is made that the ability of the noun to reflect a situation, that is to reflect propositional semantics in speech, is explained by the fact that linguistic units are connected with mental ones. In this very case it is the connection of the substantive word with its lexical semantics and the proposition that organizes knowledge of the situation.

Download file
Counter downloads: 160

Keywords

имя существительное, концепт, ситуация, пропозиция, сценарий (скрипт), когнитивная семантика, связь языковых и ментальных единиц, noun, concept, situation, proposition, scenario (script), cognitive semantics, connection of linguistic and mental units

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Iliukhina Nadezhda A.Samara Universityilnadezhda@rambler.ru
Всего: 1

References

Кубрякова Е.С. В поисках сущности языка: вместо введения // Когнитивные исследования языка. Вып. IV. Концептуализация мира в языке. 2009. № 4. С. 11-24.
Манаенко Г.Н. Методологические и теоретические аспекты когнитивно-дискурсивных исследований языка. Ставрополь : Изд-во СКФУ, 2016. 207 с.
Панкрац Ю.Г. Пропозиция // Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов / под общ. ред. Е.С. Кубряковой. М. : Филол. ф-т МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, 1997. С. 137-140.
Панкрац Ю.Г. Пропозициональные модели / структуры // Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов / под общ. ред. Е.С. Кубряковой. М. : Филол. ф-т МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, 1997. С. 134-137.
Илюхина Н.А. О типологии лексической метонимии в свете когнитивного принципа // Вестник Самарского университета. История, педагогика, филология. 2015. № 7. С. 36-48.
Большой толковый словарь русского языка / гл. ред. С.А. Кузнецов. 1-е изд. СПб. : Норинт, 1998. (Публ. в авт. ред. 2014 года. URL: http://gramota.ru)
Talmy L. How language structures space // H.L. Pick, Jr., Acredolo (eds.) Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application. New York : Plenum Press, 1983. P. 225-282.
Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 2. Concept Structuring Systems. Cambr. (Mass.); London : A Bradford Book ; The MIT Press, 2000.
Падучева Е.В. К когнитивной теории метонимии // Доклады международной конференции. Диалог. М., 2003. С. 12-18.
Падучева Е.В. Динамические модели в семантике лексики. М. : Языки славянской культуры, 2004. 608 с.
Илюхина Н.А. Сценарная метонимия: механизм образования и некоторые разновидности // Вестник Самарского университета. История, педагогика, филология. 2015. № 11 (133). С. 9-16.
Лакофф Дж. Женщины, огонь и опасные вещи: Что категории языка говорят нам о мышлении / пер. с англ. И.Б. Шатуновского. М. : Языки славянской культуры, 2004. 792 с.
Rhods R. Semantics in Relational Grammar. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago : Chicago Linguistic Society, 1977.
 Noun as a Means of Prepositional Semantics Representation | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2019. № 446. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/446/3

Noun as a Means of Prepositional Semantics Representation | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2019. № 446. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/446/3

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2514