Regulation of Imprisonment in Spain | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 451. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/451/28

Regulation of Imprisonment in Spain

The article presents studies of one of two main documents on the Spanish prison system, the Decree of 1981. The aim of the article is to acquaint the Russian-speaking reader with the peculiarities of the legal regulation of imprisonment in Spain and to offer acceptable ways to improve the penal laws in Russia. The research methods are statistical, comparative legal, and systematization. The Decree has several chapters: general provisions, general organization, prison regime, separation and classification, prison treatment, permits for departure, special forms of the execution of punishment, parole and prison privileges, assistance to prisons, promotions and penalties, organization of prisons, the economic and administrative system of prisons. The Decree has similarities and differences with Russian laws in terms of legal technique and content of regulated social relations. The important features revealed in the study are as following. (1) Classification into different prison regimes. There are three degrees of prisoner status (1st, 2nd and 3rd) which entail three corresponding prison regimes. In open-regime prisons, conditions of semi-freedom are established. In closed system (the most severe form), convicts live in isolation from society. Prisons set different conditions. (2) Content of the activities of the prison. The Decree is based on the concept of reformation aimed at correctional education so that the observation of the personality of each prisoner should help identify the best individual path for them to be reintegrated in the society. (3) Structure, organization and control of the prison. The prison consists of sections, blocks, departments, that distribute and divide prisoners by sex, age, criminal past, needs for correction. Currently, preference is given to the so-called multi-purpose institutions, within which various sections, units and offices are established that function both as places of pre-trial detention and as institutions for the execution of sentences. The supervisory judge is the main body responsible for supervising over prison activities. The Decree details provisions of the 1979 Organic Law, but has a significant number of references to other acts. The style and content of the Decree are in line with international documents. The penitentiary classification is formulated (the principle of scientific individualization), it differs from the progressive system. The Decree details the powers of the judge in sentence execution, which demonstrates their broad participation in criminal cases. The experience of Spain is of cognitive and practical interest. While improving the Russian penal laws, it is advisable to pay attention to prisoners associations, prison classification and individual correction programs.

Download file
Counter downloads: 145

Keywords

уголовно-исполнительное законодательство, пенитенциарный регламент, зарубежный опыт, Испания, penal enforcement legislation, prison rules, foreign experience, Spain

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Grushin Fedor V.Academy of Law and Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russiafedor062@yandex.ru
Siryakov Alexey N.Academy of Law and Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia643350@mail.ru
Всего: 2

References

Сводка тюремного мира Института исследований уголовной политики (The World Prison Brief the Institute for Criminal Policy Research). URL : https://prisonstudies.org/country/spain (дата обращения: 14.08.2019).
Официальный государственный бюллетень. URL : https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1979-23708 (дата обращения: 14.08.2019).
Официальный государственный бюллетень. URL : http://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1996-3307 (дата обращения: 14.08.2019).
Адамес Кастро, Росио Формирование и развитие современного пенитенциарного права (Rocio Adamez Castro Formacion y evolucion del Derecho Penitenciario Moderno) // Revista de Estudios Penitenciarios. 2015. № 258. P. 49-86. URL : http://www.derechopenitenciario.com/ comun/fichero.asp?id=4212 (дата обращения: 10.09.2019).
Управление Организации Объединенных Наций по контролю за наркотиками и преступности. URL : https://www.unodc.org/documents/ justice-and-prison-reformZNelson_Mandela_Rules-R-ebook.pdf (дата обращения: 14.08.2019).
Совет Европы. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/prison/conventions-recommendations#recommendations-bookmark (дата обращения: 14.08.2019).
Методические рекомендации по юридико-техническому оформлению законопроектов. Письмо Аппарата ГД ФС РФ от 18.11.2003 № вн2- 18/490.
Леганес Г., Сантьяго. Пенитенциарная классификация и открытый режим: докторская диссертация. Т. II (Santiago Leganes Gomez Clasificacion Penitenciaria y Medio Abierto: Tesis Doctoral. T. II). Valencia, 2013. 1057 p. URL: https://core.ac.uk/ download/pdf/71009003.pdf (дата обращения: 13.09.2019).
Ньето Г., Анхель Х. Двойная административная инстанция в тюремной классификации (Angel Juan Nieto Garcia La doble instancia administrativa en la clasificacion penitenciaria) // Diario La Ley. 2010. № 7341. Seccion Doctrina. URL: http://aladino.webcindario. com/varios/nieto1.pdf (дата обращения: 14.08.2019).
Середа С.П. Дифференциация и индивидуализация исполнения наказания в виде лишения свободы при изменении вида исправительного учреждения // Вестник института: преступление, наказание, исправление. 2019. Т. 13, № 1. С. 78-84.
Галлардо Г., Роза М. Программы и мероприятия пенитенциарного лечения: необходимо привести в соответствие с законом (Rosa M. Gallardo Garcia Los programas y actividades del tratamiento penitenciario: la necesaria adaptacion de la norma) // Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruna. 2016. Vol. 20. P. 139-160. URL: http://www.derechopenitenciario.com/doctrina/doctrina-res.asp?buscar=S&pg=3 (дата обращения: 09.09.2019).
Уткин В.А., Киселёв М.В., Савушкин С.М. «Гибридные» и «мультирежимные» пенитенциарные учреждения: преимущества и риски // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право. 2018. № 29. С. 103-113.
Корона Т., Рубен Д. Обеспечение исполнения уголовных наказаний Судьей по надзору за пенитенциарными учреждениями за 36 лет его действия в испанском законодательстве // Revista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia. 2015. Vol. 11. P. 1-30. URL: http://www.derechopenitenciario.com/comun/fichero.asp?id=5117 (дата обращения: 10.09.2019).
 Regulation of Imprisonment in Spain | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 451. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/451/28

Regulation of Imprisonment in Spain | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 451. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/451/28

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2260