Inclusive Education: Public Opinion and Insiders' Experience | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 453. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/453/12

Inclusive Education: Public Opinion and Insiders' Experience

Inclusion is the principle of social policy, a topic of scholarly and public debate, and a social value fully or partly shared at different levels: in family, school, among colleagues, in society as a whole. Therefore, the study of school inclusion is carried out in the context of social reforms, taking into account public opinion and the attitudes of participants in the educational process at the micro level of everyday life. The use of quantitative and qualitative data allow integrating important perspectives to understand the new and interesting phenomenon of the inclusive school. A survey among the participants of the educational process showed that the attitude to the inclusive education of children with disabilities with other children differs between teachers and parents. For the most part, both teachers and parents speak positively, but this assessment is still more common among parents. Teachers talk about the negative sides of co-education twice as often as parents, and the majority of respondents (both teachers and parents) point out the positive sides. The majority of the surveyed seventh-graders express positive attitudes towards inclusive education, but still there is a significant proportion of those who point out that not all children can and should study in a regular school. At the same time, the students note that schools, for the most part, are not suitable for children with various disabilities. The organizational culture of the school acts as a system of interrelated value-symbolic and behavioral elements; these are visible evidence, espoused values and basic assumptions. According to the analysis of qualitative interviews, the organizational culture of inclusive schools is evident not only in the availability of schools for children with various characteristics, but mainly in the fact that the participants are in solidarity and share the values of inclusion. At the same time, kids are included in extra-curricular activities, and mutual support and participation by default become characteristics of everyday life of individuals and groups. The values of cohesion in an inclusive school also extend to interactions between teachers and parents (guardians). Partnership relations themselves are a value in the system of inclusive culture and act as a bridge that unites and allows reaching a consensus among the educational process participants on the inclusion of different children. The authors conclude that inclusive processes in education today must be supported not only by technological development, but also by the formation of positive attitudes in the culture of society as a whole.

Download file
Counter downloads: 243

Keywords

инклюзивное образование, дети с инвалидностью, организационная культура, inclusive education, children with disabilities, inclusive school culture, inclusion, organizational culture

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Goriainova Aleksandra R.Higher School of Economicsagoryajnova@hse.ru
Iarskaia-Smirnova Elena R.Journal of Social Policy Studies; Higher School of Economicseiarskaia@hse.ru
Всего: 2

References

Приказ Министерства образования и науки РФ от 19 декабря 2014 г. № 1598 «Об утверждении федерального государственного образова тельного стандарта начального общего образования обучающихся с ограниченными возможностями здоровья» // База Гарант. URL: https://base.garant.ru/70862366/ (дата обращения: 04.04.2019).
Крецул Р., Нодельман В. Для детей-инвалидов приспособлена лишь одна из пяти школ // Сайт газеты «Известия». 2018. 14 марта. URL: https://iz.ru/719566/roman-kretcul-valeriia-nodelman/dlia-detei-invalidov-prisposoblena-lish-odna-iz-piati-shkol (дата обращения: 04.04.2019).
Oliver M. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke : MacMillan, 1990.
Barnes C., Oliver M. 'Disability Rights: Rhetoric and Reality in the UK' in Disability and Society. 1995. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 110-116.
Loreman T., Forlin Ch. Measuring Inclusive Education. International Perspectives on Inclusive Education. First edition. Bingley, UK : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014. Vol. 3.
Booth T., Ainscow M. Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol : Centre for Studies on Inclusive Educa tion, 2002.
Pivik J., McComas J., Laflamme M. Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education // Exceptional children. 2002. Vol. 69, № 1. P. 97-107.
Atkinson A.B., Marlier E. Analysing and Measuring Social Inclusion in a Global Context. New York : United Nations, 2010.
Романов П.В., Яковлева В.В. Корпоративная социальная политика: частные решения общих проблем // Отечественный журнал социаль ной работы. 2013. № 1. С. 97-105.
Романов П.В., Ярская-Смирнова Е.Р. Оценка эффективности деятельности учреждений социальной поддержки населения. М. : Моск. обществ. науч. фонд «Центр социальной политики и гендерных исследований», 2007.
Проект Приказа Министерства образования и науки РФ «Об утверждении показателей, характеризующих общие критерии оценки качества условий осуществления образовательной деятельности организациями, осуществляющими образовательную деятельность» (подготовлен Минобрнауки России 30.03.2018) // База Гарант. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/56648803/ (дата обращения: 04.04.2019).
Dempster H., Hargrave K. Understanding of social attitudes towards refugees and migrants. Working paper 512. London : The Chatham House, 2017.
Ярская-Смирнова Е.Р., Лошакова И.И. Инклюзивное образование детей-инвалидов // Социологические исследования. 2003. № 5. С. 100-106.
Зайцев Д.В. Интегрированное образование детей с ограниченными возможностями // Социологические исследования. 2004. № 7. С. 127-132.
Чигрина А.Я. Инклюзивное образование детей-инвалидов: отношение общества и практика распространения // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. НИ Лобачевского. Сер. Социальные науки. 2010. № 1. C. 56-62.
Отношение общества к детям с ограниченными возможностями здоровья и детям-инвалидам. М. : Фонд поддержки детей, находящихся в трудной жизненной ситуации, 2017.
Формирование инклюзивной организационной культуры. Межкультурные компетенции в социальных службах : метод. руководство: пер. с англ. / под общ. ред. Е. Ярской-Смирновой. М. ; Страсбург : Совет Европы, 2017.
Council of Europe. Constructing an Inclusive Institutional Culture: Methodological Guide: Intercultural Competences in Social Services. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2011.
Бут Т., Эйнскоу М. Показатели инклюзии. Практическое пособие. М. : Перспектива, 2007.
Zollers N.J., Ramanathan A.K., Moonset Yu. The Relationship Between School Culture and Inclusion: How an Inclusive Culture Supports Inclusive Education // International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 1999. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 157-174.
Шейн Э. Организационная культура и лидерство: пер. с англ. / под ред. В.А. Спивака. СПб. : Питер, 2002.
Jackson P.W. Life in Classrooms. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
Ярская-Смирнова Е.Р. Гендерная социализация в образовании // Словарь гендерных терминов / под ред. А. Денисовой. М. : Информация - XXI век, 2002.
Martin J.R. What Should We Do With a Hidden Curriculum When We Find One? // Curriculum Inquiry. 1976. Vol. 2, № 6. P. 135-152.
Dreeben R. On What is Learned in School. Massachusets : Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1968.
Getzels J.W. Images of the Classroom and Visions of the Learner // School Review. 1974. № 82. P. 527-540.
Owen M.J. Studying Organizational Symbolism. Qualitative Research Methods Series. London: Sage, 1996.
Романов П.В. Культурные символы в социально-антропологических исследованиях организаций // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2002. Т. 5, № 3. С. 192-206.
 Inclusive Education: Public Opinion and Insiders' Experience | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 453. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/453/12

Inclusive Education: Public Opinion and Insiders' Experience | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 453. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/453/12

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1326