The Influence of Bilingualism on Emotional Words Cognitive Processing (Turkic-Russian Bilingualism) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 455. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/455/1

The Influence of Bilingualism on Emotional Words Cognitive Processing (Turkic-Russian Bilingualism)

The aim of this article is to identify the presence or absence of differences in the cognitive processing of diminutives in native Russian speakers and Turkic-Russian bilinguals. The problem set in the study is solved using a behavioral experiment with measuring subject's reaction time to the presented objects, i.e., the reaction time is a dependent variable in the design. An independent variable is a type of stimulus emotionality with four levels: non-emotional words, emotional words with diminutive suffixes, emotional words with positive and negative evaluation. Categorization was used as a task. The total number of the stimuli in the experiment was 371: 163 units are non-derivative words, 166 are diminutives formed from non-derivative words, and 42 are groups of words with positive and negative evaluation. The study was conducted in two stages. At the first stage, the respondents were native Russian speakers, 23 people (9 men, 14 women) aged 18 to 53. At the second stage, the respondents were Turkic-Russian bilinguals, 23 people (10 men, 13 women) aged 16 to 52, natural bilinguals, whose native language is one of the Turkic language: Shor, Khakass, or Tatar. The results of the experiment were analyzed using the STATISTICA and SPSS Statistics packages. For the analysis the ANCOVA covariance analysis was used. The analysis of the obtained data showed that the cognitive processing of diminutives differs from the cognitive processing of neutral units in both native Russian speakers and in Turkic-Russian bilinguals. Russian speakers are influenced by the word frequency factor, while Turkic-Russian bilinguals are influenced by the frequency and length of the word. It is reflected in the reaction time difference of response to these stimuli. In addition, native speakers of Russian in general process words faster than bilingual subjects. A correlation analysis was performed to identify the peculiarities of reaction time interaction with psycholinguistic parameters (frequency, power of emotion, type of evaluation, and contextual correlation). A nonpara-metric Spearman correlation coefficient was used for the analysis. The analyzed data showed that the reaction time interacts with other psycholinguistic parameters: frequency and power of emotion in two groups of subjects, contextual correlation in native Russian speakers. In the author's opinion, the differences are mainly explained by the typological differences of languages, as well as by the type of the studied lexical units and their special position in the Russian and Turkic languages. But, on the other hand, the same principles of processing emotional and neutral units suggest that the type of bilingualism-early unbalanced with the dominance of the second language-still has an impact, which correlates with the data obtained earlier.

Download file
Counter downloads: 171

Keywords

диминутив, эмоциональность, тюркско-русский билингвизм, когнитивная обработка, время реакции, diminutive, emotionality, Turkic-Russian bilingualism, cognitive processing, reaction time

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Vasilyeva Alina V.Tomsk State Universityalvasilevaaa@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Kanske P., Kotz S.A. Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study // Brain research. 2007. Vol. 1148. Р. 138-148.
Knickerbocker H., Johnson R.L., Altarriba J. Emotion effects during reading: Influence of an emotion target word on eye movements and pro cessing // Cognition and Emotion. 2015. Vol. 29 (5). Р. 784-806.
Tabert M.H. et al. Differential amygdala activation during emotional decision and recognition memory tasks using unpleasant words: an fMRI study // Neuropsychologia. 2001. Vol. 39 (6). Р. 556-573.
Windmann S., Daum I., GUntUrkUn O. Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: Effects of the stimulus presentation format // Brain and Language. 2002. Vol. 80 (3). Р. 269-286.
Нагель О.В. Словообразовательные механизмы в процессах восприятия, идентификации и использования языка : автореф. дис.. д-ра филол. наук. Томск, 2017. 42 с.
Kuperman V., Estes Z., Brysbaert M., Warriner A.B. Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition // Journal of Experi mental Psychology: General. 2014. Vol. 143 (3). P. 1065-1081.
Larsen R.J., Mercer K.A., Balota D.A., Strube M.J. Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal // Emotion (Washington D.C.). 2008. Vol. 8. P. 445-452.
Резанова З.И., Некрасова Е.Д. Семантика диминутивных суффиксов в восприятии носителей русского языка: влияние контекстных и социальных факторов // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2017. № 421. С. 12-21.
Mendez-Bertolo C., Pozo M.A., Hinojosa J.A. Word frequency modulates the processing of emotional words: Convergent behavioral and electro physiological data // Neuroscience letters. 2011. Vol. 494 (3). P. 250-254.
Zevin J.D., Seidenberg M.S. Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks // Journal of Memory and language. 2002. Vol. 47 (1). P. 1-29. D0I:10.1006/jmla.2001.2834
Anooshian L.J., Hertel P.T. Emotionality in free recall: Language specificity in bilingual memory // Cognition & Emotion. 1994. Vol. 8 (6). P. 503-514.
Aycicegi A., Harris C. Bilinguals' recall and recognition of emotion words // Cognition & Emotion. 2004. Vol. 18 (7). P. 977-987.
Ayjijegi-Dinn A., Caldwell-Harris C.L. Emotion-memory effects in bilingual speakers: A levels-of-processing approach // Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2009. Vol. 12 (03). P. 291-303.
Eilola T.M., Havelka J., Sharma D. Emotional activation in the first and second language // Cognition & Emotion. 2007. Vol. 21 (5). P. 1064-1076.
Ponari M. et al. Processing advantage for emotional words in bilingual speakers // Emotion. 2015. Vol. 15 (5). P. 644-652. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000061
Altarriba J. Expressions of emotion as mediated by context // Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2008. Vol. 11 (2). P. 165-167.
Dewaele J.M. The emotional force of swearwords and taboo words in the speech of multilinguals // Journal of multilingual and multicultural development. 2004. Vol. 25 (2-3). P. 204-222.
Резанова З.И., Некрасова Е.Д., Миклашевский А. А. Исследование психолингвистических и когнитивных аспектов языкового контактирования в проекте «Языковое и этнокультурное разнообразие Южной Сибири в синхронии и диахронии: взаимодействие языков и культур» // Русин. 2018. № 2 (52). С. 107-117.
Некрасова Е.Д., Резанова З.И., Палий В.Е. Влияние родного языка (L1) на когнитивную обработку грамматической категории рода существительных русского языка (L2) русско-тюркскими билингвами // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2019. № 57. С. 103-123.
Буб А.С., Артеменко Е.Д. Когнитивная обработка биномиалов русского языка тюркско-русскими билингвами // Язык и культура. 2019. № 48. P. 32-45.
Васильева А.В., Резанова З.И. Эмоциональность диминутива: соотношение с оценочностью, частотностью, возрастом усвоения, контекстуальной маркированностью // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2019. № 445. C. 22-31.
Лукьянова Н.А. Экспрессивная лексика разговорного употребления: проблемы семантики. Новосибирск : Наука, 1986. 230 с.
Бабенко Л.Г. Большой толковый словарь русских существительных: Идеографическое описание. Синонимы. Антонимы. М. : АСТ-Пресс; Книга, 2008. 862 с.
Ляшевская О.Н., Шаров С. А. Частотный словарь современного русского языка (на материалах Национального корпуса русского языка). М. : Азбуковник, 2009. 1087 с.
Brysbaert M., Stevens M. Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial // Journal of Cognition. 2018. Vol. 1 (1).
 The Influence of Bilingualism on Emotional Words Cognitive Processing (Turkic-Russian Bilingualism) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 455. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/455/1

The Influence of Bilingualism on Emotional Words Cognitive Processing (Turkic-Russian Bilingualism) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 455. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/455/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2308