Criteria for Identifying Middle-Range Theories in Criminology | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 457. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/457/30

Criteria for Identifying Middle-Range Theories in Criminology

The article discusses the criteria for classifying middle-range theories in criminology. The middle-range theory was developed by the American sociologist Robert Merton in his Social Theory and Social Structure. The article aims to analyze the specifics of applying the criteria of the middle-range theory to criminological research. General (analysis, synthesis, systemic-structural) and specific (biographical analysis, statistical analysis, comparative historical analysis, expert assessment) methods were used in the study. As a result of the study, the following conclusions were obtained. The developing nature of criminology is due to the fact that its object and place in the system of legal and social sciences are not clearly defined; criminology has no independent research methods and uses methods developed in other sciences, primarily sociology and statistics. Scientific schools in criminology are possible as they employ various and unique approaches to the study of its object, specific methodologies for studying particular problems, and have founders and followers of such approaches. The systems approach used in the study allowed the authors to consider the place of criminological research in social sciences and to determine other criteria of middle-range theories in criminology. These criteria include: the attribution of criminology to social and legal sciences; conclusions about specific phenomena or their specific aspects (rather than about all elements of the object of criminology) in these theories; attribution of some research to an intermediate link in scientific knowledge. Criminology is classified as a social science because of its subject matter, which includes such social phenomena as crime, the determinants of crime, the identity of the criminal, and crime prevention, as well as its methods developed by other social sciences. The attribution of criminology to legal sciences is due to the fact that its main object of study is crime, consisting of offences defined by the criminal law. Criminological middle-range theories do not contain conclusions about all elements of the object of criminology; they contain the results of studies of certain types of crime, the identity of the offender, the determinants of crime, crime prevention. The fact that a number of studies occupy an intermediate place in scientific knowledge means that middle-range theories are located between research on the most general issues of criminology and applied criminological research on a specific problem.

Download file
Counter downloads: 67

Keywords

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Prozumentov Lev M.Tomsk State Universitykrim_tsu@mail.ru
Shesler Aleksandr V.Tomsk State University; Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russiasofish@inbox.ru
Всего: 2

References

Шестаков Д. А. Криминология. СПб., 2006. 561 с.
Кармин А.С., Бернацкий Г.Г. Философия. СПб., 2001. 536 с.
Момджян К.Х. Введение в социальную философию. М., 1997. 448 с.
Андреева Г.М. Социальная психология. М., 1999. 363 с.
Сорокин П.А. Преступление и кара, подвиг и награда: социологический этюд об основных формах общественного поведения и морали. М., 2006. 618 с.
Мухаев Р.Т. Политология. М., 2000. 400 с.
Кохановский В.П. Философия и методология науки. Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 1999. 576 с.
Клейменов М.П. Введение в этнокриминологию. Омск, 2004. 244 с.
Шеслер А.В. Групповая преступность: криминологические и уголовно-правовые аспекты : автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. Екатерин бург, 2000. 32 с.
Мертон Р. Социальная теория и социальная структура. М., 2006. 873 с.
Прозументов Л.М., Шеслер А.В. Криминология. Общая часть. Томск, 2017. 284 с.
Герцензон А. А. Уголовное право и социология. М., 1970. 276 с.
Ковалев М.И. Основы криминологии. М., 1970. 160 с.
Криминология / под ред. Н.Ф. Кузнецовой. М., 2010. 548 с.
Антонян Ю.М., Еникеев М.И., Эминов В.Е. Психология преступника и расследование преступлений. М., 1996. 172 с.
Антонян Ю.М. Криминогенная роль психологического отчуждения личности // Советское государство и право. 1988. № 8. С. 53-57.
Антонян Ю. М. Методика ТАТ в изучении личности преступника // Личность преступника: методы изучения и проблемы воздействия. М., 1988. С. 4-16.
Антонян Ю.М., Гульдан В.В. Использование теста Роршаха в криминологическом исследовании // Личность преступника: методы изучения и проблемы воздействия. М., 1988. С. 18-24.
 Criteria for Identifying Middle-Range Theories in Criminology | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 457. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/457/30

Criteria for Identifying Middle-Range Theories in Criminology | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 457. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/457/30

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2453