Satisfaction of Small Russian Cities' Residents with the Quality of Their Lives: A Case Study of Perm Krai | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 458. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/458/13

Satisfaction of Small Russian Cities' Residents with the Quality of Their Lives: A Case Study of Perm Krai

The problem of population satisfaction with the quality of life is considered. The subjective perception by a person of the quality of his life is an important internal factor that affects his social well-being, satisfaction with his position, prospects, and individual spheres of society. Improving the quality of life of the population is one of the primary tasks of the authorities. Therefore, the analysis of the population's assessment of the quality of certain aspects of their lives is important for federal and local authorities to determine priority areas of social policy, develop strategies and work plans of state institutions of various departments, etc. The article presents the results of a comparative study of differences in the subjective perception of various indicators of quality of life and satisfaction with various areas of life of people of different age groups. N.V. Panina's "Life Satisfaction Index", I. Karler's technique to study the degree of satisfaction with one's functioning in various fields, the Russified version of "MOS SF-36" for assessing the quality of life were used as research tools. The study was conducted in the cities of the Upper Kama region (the north of Perm Krai). The sample size was 600 people. Respondents are representatives of three age groups. Men and women are in equal proportions. Group distribution was carried out on the basis of the age classification proposed by the Institute of Age Physiology of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the USSR: adolescence (17- to 21-year-olds); maturity (middle age (36- to 55-year-olds); elderly age (56-to 75-year-olds). Groups were equalized in quantitative composition. It has been revealed that among the residents of small regional cities, regardless of age, the general level of satisfaction with the quality of life is at an average level, among older people there is a tendency to a lower level. Life satisfaction and quality of life indicators decline with age. There are no statistically significant differences in the general life satisfaction index for people of different age groups. However, some indicators of quality of life revealed significant differences. In each age group, there is a certain resource sphere of life, the successful functioning of which is the basis of satisfaction, stability, and success. It is a marital relationship for the elderly, a professional sphere for middle-aged people, a social sphere for young people. The data obtained can help to define the priorities of social policy in regions, can be used in the development of socially-oriented technologies and programs aimed at improving of the living conditions of people.

Download file
Counter downloads: 111

Keywords

quality of life, social well-being, spheres of human life, vital needs, vital resources, sense of happiness, age groups of people, region of Russia, life satisfaction, living conditions

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kulagina Nataliya V.Solikamsk State Pedagogical University, Branch of Perm State Universitynatkulagina@inbox.ru
Всего: 1

References

Баженов С.А., Маликов Н.С. Качество жизни населения: теория и практика. М. : ЭКОС, 2002. 178 с.
Кабанов М.М., Бурковский Г.В., Коцюбинский А.П. Использование опросника «Качество жизни» (Версия ВОЗ) в психиатрической прак тике. Пособие для врачей и психологов. СПб., 1998. 55 с.
Veenhoven R. Apparent Quality of Life: How Long and Happy People Live // Social Indicators Research, 2005. Vol. 71. P. 61-86.
Fernandez-Ballesteros R. Quality of life: concept and assessment // Advances in Psychological Science. Vol. I: Social, Personal and Cultural As pects / Ed. D. Belanger, K. Dion. New York : Psychological Press, 1998. 580 р.
Айвазян С.А. Интегральные индикаторы качества жизни населения: их построение и использование в социально-экономическом управ лении и межрегиональных сопоставлениях. М. : ЦЭМИ РАН, 2000. 118 с.
Алмакаева А.М. Субъективное качество жизни: основные проблемы исследования // Вестник СамГУ. 2006. № 5. С. 41-47.
Баранова А.В. Экономико-психологические детерминанты субъективного качества жизни : дис.. канд. психол. наук. М., 2005. 197 с.
Джидарьян И.А. Психология счастья и оптимизма. М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2013. 268 с.
Куликов Л.В. Детерминанты удовлетворенности жизнью // Общество и политика / ред. В.Ю. Большаков. СПб. : СПб. ун-т, 2000. С. 476-510.
Русалинова А.А. Социальное самочувствие человека в современном мире как научная проблема // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 6.1994. № 1. С. 49-60.
Савченко Т.Н., Головина Г.М. Субъективное качество жизни: подходы, методы оценки, прикладные исследования. М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 1996. 170 с.
Чой В.И., Оберемко О.А. Индикаторы качества жизни в региональных центрах России // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 6. С. 57-67.
Шамионов Р.М. Субъективное благополучие личности: психологическая картина и факторы. Саратов : Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 2008. 296 с.
Diener E. Measuring Quality Of Life: economic, social and subjective indicators // Social Indicators Research.1997. № 40. P. 190-216.
Fisher J. Subjective Well-being as Welfare Measure: Concepts and Methodology. 2009. 42 p. URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16619
Kahneman D., Krueger A.B. Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 3-24.
Тихонова Н.Е. Удовлетворенность россиян жизнью: динамика и факторы // Общественные науки и современность. 2015. № 3. С. 19-33.
Кислицына О. А. Измерение качества жизни / благополучия: международный опыт. М. : Ин-т экономики РАН, 2016. 62 с.
Петухов К.А. Проблемы алкоголизации и социальное самочувствие в Пермском крае // Современные исследования социальных проблем. 2013. № 5 (25). URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-alkogolizatsii-i-sotsialnoe-samochuvstvie-zhiteley- permskogo-kraya (дата обращения: 05.07.2018).
Лазарева О. А. Удовлетворенность жизнью и ее основными аспектами у жителей г. Саратов // Гуманитарные научные исследования. 2013. № 8. URL: http://human.snauka.ru /2013/08/3690 (дата обращения: 14.01.2017).
Панина Н.В. Индекс жизненной удовлетворенности // Life-Line и другие новые методы психологии жизненного пути / сост. и общ. ред. А. А. Кроника. М. : Прогресс-Культура, 1993. С. 107-114.
Карвасарский Б.Д. Клиническая психология : учебник. М., 2004. 553 с.
Кувалдин С. Старость - наше будущее, или уроки демографии // Коммерсантъ Власть. 2015. № 48. С. 9.
 Satisfaction of Small Russian Cities' Residents with the Quality of Their Lives: A Case Study of Perm Krai | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 458. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/458/13

Satisfaction of Small Russian Cities' Residents with the Quality of Their Lives: A Case Study of Perm Krai | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2020. № 458. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/458/13

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2430