Adult Literacy in the USA, 1992-2014: Results of National and International Assessments
The article aims at revealing the change of adult (functional) literacy in the USA and defining the role played by general (country's population growth, the system of adult education, and its funding) and specific (age, ethnicity, and race) factors. The research is based on the results of national and international assessments of the level of adult literacy in 1992-2014. The following methods were applied for the research: generalization, system, deductive, inductive, and comparative, as well as the historical method and cluster selection for analyzing statistics. The author outlined the concept of functional literacy and described demographic features of the USA on the basis of migration statistics and the ethnic and racial portrait of the country's population. The author reviewed the American and Russian historiography of adult literacy. A brief history and the current state of the US system of adult education and the corresponding legislation were presented. The study provided data on how the system of adult education was financed and what the initial level of education of migrants and the US migrant policy and testing were. The results of national and international assessments of adult literacy in 1992-2014 were analyzed and compared by literacy types on the national scale and among ethnic groups/races in the USA. The author concluded that the USA had not met the challenge of modern literacy connected not only with rather average assessments of its level in comparison with other countries of the world, but also with significant differences in the level of adult literacy within the country, despite political interest in improving this socioeconomic index, the legislative support which was embodied in setting up the system of adult education based on regional demands, and its annually growing budget. Besides, contradictions in the information (the results of the international assessments were lower than those presented in analytical reports within the country) on adult literacy in the USA available to most Americans were revealed. Trends of the change of literacy levels shown by representatives of various ethnic groups were defined. White Americans demonstrated the highest level of all types of literacy (above the country's average). Together with the growing level of literacy of Asians and African-Americans, it allowed the USA to remain in the middle of the list of the tested countries of the OECD. The initially low indicators of literacy of Latin Americans and their having become the largest ethnic minority in the USA by the 2000s affected the growth of the country's literacy in the world rankings negatively. Document literacy was the only indicator which remained stable throughout this period by the results of national surveys. By the results of the international ones, it even rose both compared to the earlier assessments and to the gradually decreasing average world level.
Keywords
adult literacy,
literacy assessment,
adult competenciesAuthors
| Zakharova Nataliya V. | Tomsk State University | zakharova_n@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Мировая миграция в цифрах. Совместный доклад Департамента по экономическим и социальным вопросам ООН (ДЭСВ) и ОЭСР, 2013. с. URL: https://www.oecd.org/els/mig/RUSSIAN.pdf (дата обращения: 23.08.2018).
Digest of Education Statistics. Table 101.20. Estimates of resident population, by race/ethnicity and age group: Selected years, 1980 through 2016. NCES. URL: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_101.20.asp?referer=raceindicators (дата обращения: 08.07.2019).
Migration Policy Institute. United States. Demographics and Social. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/state-profiles/state/demographics/ US (дата обращения: 08.07.2019).
Lane S.R., Pritzker S. Political Social Work: Using Power to Create Social Change. Springer International Publishing, 2018. P. 239-240.
Literacy rates. Adult total. Compendium of statistics on illiteracy. URL: www.hbs.edu/businesshistory/Lists/../31/literacy.xls (дата обращения: 11.07.2019).
Захарова Н.В. Национальные образовательные программы повышения грамотности в США, первая половина 1990-х годов // Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История, филология. 2018. № 1. С. 17-28.
Фролова П.И. Формирование функциональной грамотности как основа развития учебно-познавательной компетентности студентов тех нического вуза в процессе изучения гуманитарных дисциплин. Омск : СибА-ДИ, 2012. 196 с.
Elias J.L., Merriam S.B. Philosophical Foundations of Adult Education. Krieger Pub Co, 2004. 286 p.
Merriam S.B., Bierema L.L. Adult Learning: Linking Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass, 2013. 320 p.
Beder H. Reasons for Nonparticipation in Adult Basic Education // Adult Education Quarterly. 1990. № 40 (4). P. 207-218.
Beder H. The Infrastructure of Adult Literacy Education: Implications for Policy. USA: National Center on Adult Literacy, University of Pennsylvania, 1996. 20 p.
Beder H. The Outcomes and Impacts of Adult Literacy Education in the United States // National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Harvard Graduate School of Education. 1999. № 6. P. 77-79.
Sticht T.G. Adult Literacy Education // Review of Research in Education. 1988. Vol. 15. P. 59-96.
Sticht T.G. Adult Education for Social Justice & Workforce Development. 2017. 40 p. URL: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/320110314_Adult_Education_for_Social_Justice_Workforce_Development (дата обращения: 20.05.2019.).
Sticht T. The Rise of the Adult Education and Literacy System in the United States: 1600-2000 // Review of Adult Learning and Literacy. 2002. Vol. 3. 87 p.
Подобед В.И., Горшкова В.В. Государственно-общественная ценность образования взрослых как социокультурного института // Человек и образование. 2010. № 1 (22). С. 45-50.
Современные адаптивные системы образования взрослых : сб. тр. / сост.: В.И. Подобед, А.Е. Марон, Н.В. Василенко. СПб. : ИОВ РАО, 2002. 152 с.
Марон А.Е., Резинкина Л.В. Взрослый в новом обществе и проблемы его саморазвития в условиях непрерывного продуктивного образования // Человек и образование. 2017. № 1 (50). С. 21-25.
Вершловский С.Г. Система образования взрослых как объект прогнозирования // Человек и образование. 2006. № 8-9. С. 54-59.
Вершловский С.Г. Постдипломное образование: вызовы времени // Академический вестник. Вестник Санкт-Петербургской академии постдипломного педагогического образования. 2012. № 1-2 (18-19). С. 25-30.
Согрин В.В. Исторический опыт США. М. : Наука, 2010. 581 с.
Марцинкевич В.И. Образование в США: экономическое значение и эффективность. М. : Наука, 1967. 198 с.
Супян В.Б. Наука и образование в США: главные приоритеты развития в «экономике знаний» // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2008. № 6. С. 23-34.
Карпенко О.М., Бершадская М.Д. Высшее образование в странах мира: анализ данных образовательной статистики и глобальных рейтингов в сфере образования. М. : Изд-во Современного гуманитарного ун-та, 2009. 243 с.
Карпенко О.М., Бершадская М.Д., Вознесенская Ю.А. Показатели уровня образования населения в странах мира: анализ данных международной статистики // Социология образования. 2008. № 6. С. 4-20.
Вахштайн В. С. После модернизации. Кросс-национальный обзор систем высшего образования: особенности атлантической модели // Ученый совет. 2014. № 1. С. 56-68.
Сорокоумова Г.Д. Развитие системы непрерывного образования в США : дис.. канд. пед. наук. М., 1993. 230 с.
McHugh M., Gelatt J., Fix M. Adult English Language Instruction in the United States: Determining Need and Investing Wisely // USA: Washington D.C., Migration Policy Institute. 2007. 24 p. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/adult-english-language-instruction-united-states-determining-need-and-investing-wisely (дата обращения: 02.07.2018).
Snyder T.D., de Brey C., Dillow S.A. Digest of Education Statistics 2016. Washington D C: U.S. Department of Education, NCES 2017-094, 2018. 919 p.
America 2000: An Education Strategy. Washington, DC: Department of Education, 1991. 81 p.
Goals 2000: Educate America Act. URL: https://www2.ed.gov/legislation/G0ALS2000/TheAct/sec102.html (дата обращения: 29.08.2018).
Workforce Investment Act. Public Law 105-220. 07.09.1998. P. 125-128. URL: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-105publ220/pdf/PLAW-105publ220.pdf (дата обращения: 27.08.2018).
Applicant Information. Adult Education - Basic Grants to States. Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education. URL: https://www2.ed.gov/programs/adultedbasic/applicant.html (дата обращения: 11.01.2019).
Funding Status. Adult Education - Basic Grants to States. Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education. URL: https://www2.ed.gov/programs/adultedbasic/funding.html (дата обращения: 27.08.2018).
Immigrant Population by State, 1990-Present. USA: Migration Policy Institute. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/immigrant-population-state-1990-present?width=1000&height=850&iframe=true (дата обращения: 11.07.2019).
Hutt E., Schneider J. A History of Achievement Testing in the United States Or: Explaining the Persistence of Inadequacy // Teachers College Record. 32 p. URL: https://www.holycross.edu/sites/default/files/educ/a_history_of_achievement_testing.pdf (дата обращения: 15.07.2019).
Kirsch I., Jungeblut A. Literacy: Profiles of America's Young Adults. USA: Princeton, Educational Testing Service, 1986. 68 p. URL: https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/LITERACY_PROFILES.pdf (дата обращения: 11.07.2019).
The Survey of Adult Skills. URL: http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/aboutpiaac.htm (дата обращения: 12.07.2019).
Technical Report and Data File User's Manual for the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey, NCES 2001-457 / I. Kirsch, K. Yamamoto, N. Nor-ris [et al.]. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Education. NCES, 2001. 386 p.
National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Demographics. Overall. URL: https://nces.ed.gov/naal/kf_demographics.asp (дата обращения: 12.07.2019).
Literacy in the Information Age. Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey / N. Darcovich, A. Hasan, S. Jones [et al.]. OECD : Paris, 2000. 185 p.
Learning a Living / Y. Clermont, R. Desjardins, U. Dhawan-Biswal [et al.]. OECD; Ottawa; Paris, 2005. 332 p.
Greenberg E., Jin Y. 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy: Public-Use Data File User's Guide (NCES 2007-464). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC : NCES, 2007. 16 p.
Country Note. Survey of Adult Skills First Results. OECD. 14 p. URL: https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/Country%20note%20-%20United%20States.pdf (дата обращения: 23.05.2019).
Kutzner M., Greenberg E., Baer J. A First Look at the Literacy of America's Adults in the 21st Century. Washington D C: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, NCES. 2006-470, 2006. 28 p.
Sum A., Kirsh I., Yamamoto K. A Human Capital Concern: The Literacy Proficiency of U.S. Immigrants. Policy Information Report. USA: Policy Information Center, ETS, 2004. 60 p. URL: https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICHUMAN.pdf (дата обращения: 08.07.2019).
Zong J., Batalova J. College-Educated Immigrants in the United States. USA: Migration Policy Institute. 2016. February 3. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/college-educated-immigrants-united-states#English%20Proficiency%20and%20Education (дата обращения: 10.07.2019).
Апанович М.Ю., Пареньков Д.А. Этноконфессиональный лоббизм в США на современном этапе (2000-2017 гг.): на примере влияния ирландско-католических групп интересов на миграционную политику. 8 с. URL: https://mgimo.ru/upload/2017/10/apanovich-parenkov.pdf (дата обращения: 10.07.2019).
English and Civics Testing. US Citizenship and Immigration Services. URL: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-e-chapter-2 (дата обращения: 10.07.2019).
Adult Population. USA. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.1564.TO.ZS?locations=US&view=chart (дата обращения: 24.05.2019).
Skills of U.S. Unemployed, Young, and Older Adults in Sharper Focus: Results From the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) 2012/2014: First Look (NCES 2016-039rev) / B. Rampey, R. Finnegan, M. Goodman [et al.] Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES, 2016. 25 p.
