Three Ways to Overcome the Problem of Confidential Military Disclosure in the Investigation (Forensic and Criminal Procedure) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 465. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/465/28

Three Ways to Overcome the Problem of Confidential Military Disclosure in the Investigation (Forensic and Criminal Procedure)

In the article, the authors examine the problematic aspects connecting with the concept “state secret” and its relationship with the concepts “military secret” and “confidential information” based on the deep analysis of the empirical material, data systematization, analysis of the criminal cases initiated and investigated against the military personnel and also from the survey of practitioners (military personnel). The questions are raised about the need to improve the investigative tactics on the territory of military units or institutions. The article focuses on the problem related to the need to clarify the answers to the questions an investigator may have in criminal cases at the legislative level, e.g., What data may contain information that is a state secret or another secret protected by law? On which grounds should the investigator (inquirer) evaluate information as containing a state secret or another secret protected by law? How should the investigator (inquirer) act if they conclude the received or recorded information can be classified as a state secret or another secret protected by law? The problem is complicated by the fact that, in addition to the absence of the concept “military secret” in Russian legislation, not many scholars have taken the liberty to approach the problem doctrinally, to offer an authorial view on the concept and to formulate proposals that could fill the gaps in legislation. The authors conclude that it is necessary to develop measures to prevent dissemination of information in the military field in order to ensure the security and defense of the country. Three ways of developing these measures are proposed. Firstly, the development and normative consolidation of a special legal regime in criminal proceedings against military personnel is important. Secondly, it is necessary to improve the special methods of crime investigation committed by military personnel, investigative tactics, as well as criminal case consideration and resolution in the court of first instance. Thirdly, there is a serious need for a scientific and theoretical support of enhancing activities connected with confidential information, developing the concept “military secret” and its relationship with a state secret or another secret protected by law, delimiting information for official use and secret information.

Download file
Counter downloads: 32

Keywords

state secrets, military secrets, crimes committed by the military, tactics of investigation, military unit

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Lebedev Nikolai Yu.Novosibirsk Military Institute of the Internal Troops named after General of the Army I.K. Yakovlev of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federationlebedevnu@rambler.ru
Lebedeva Yulia V.Siberian Institute of Management, Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administrationlebedeva28031973@rambler.ru
Tolstova Irina E.Novosibirsk State Agrarian Universityirina_edvin@mail.ru
Kaloshina Tatiana Yu.Novosibirsk State Agrarian Universitykaloshinatu@mail.ru
Всего: 4

References

Указа Президента РФ от 30.11.1995 № 1203 (ред. от 08.08.2019) «Об утверждении Перечня сведений, отнесенных к государственной тайне».
Козловцев Д. М. Допрос свидетелей на начальном этапе расследования уголовных дел о хищениях оружия и боеприпасов, совершаемых военнослужащими в районах вооруженного конфликта // Вестник военного права. 2016. № 3. С. 63-67.
Талалаев В. А. Организационно-тактические особенности допроса при расследовании нарушений уставных правил взаимоотношений между военнослужащими // Традиции и перспективы развития криминалистической тактики : материалы круглого стола с междунар. участием / ред.: В.Б. Шабанов, А. А. Абдурахманов, Е.П. Орехова. Минск, 2017. С. 77-79.
Ярмонова Е.Н. Проблемы разграничения военными судами сведений, составляющих военную и государственную тайну // Вестник Воро нежского института МВД России. 2010. № 1. С. 97-100.
Олейник Т. С., Шавкеро А. Б. Военная тайна в системе информации ограниченного доступа // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. 2010. № 2. С. 357-359.
Ахметшин Х. М. Военно-уголовное законодательство Российской Федерации. М., 1999.
Слободанюк И. А. Развитие уголовного законодательства об ответственности военнослужащих за посягательства на режим сохранности государственной и военной тайны. М., 2005.
Волковский Н.Л. Свобода слова и военная тайна: исторический аспект // Век информации. 2015. № 2. С. 48-57.
Velde C. Crossing borders: an alternative conception of competence // 27 Annual SCUTREA Conference. 1997. 27- 5.
Nye J. The paradox of American power: why the world's only super power can't go it alone. New York, 2002. P. 8-9.
Grindle M.S. Good Enough Governance Revisited // Development Policy Review. 2007. Vol. 25, № 5. P. 533-574.
Police spies stole identities of dead children // The Guardian. 2013. 3 February.
 Three Ways to Overcome the Problem of Confidential Military Disclosure in the Investigation (Forensic and Criminal Procedure) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 465. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/465/28

Three Ways to Overcome the Problem of Confidential Military Disclosure in the Investigation (Forensic and Criminal Procedure) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 465. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/465/28

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 301