A Global Evolutionary Approach to Consciousness in Cognitive Science | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 466. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/466/8

A Global Evolutionary Approach to Consciousness in Cognitive Science

At the present stage of consciousness research, there is an extraordinary variety of models of consciousness proposed by science and philosophy. In this regard, the construction of a typology of consciousness concepts is appropriate, as well as the dialogue of philosophy and cognitive science in the research of consciousness. The article compares the main approaches to the phenomenon of consciousness in cognitive science: neurobiological (neural network), informational (quantum informational), and nonlinear dynamic. The authors propose to include a global evolutionary approach in this typology. The global evolutionary approach is close to a nonlinear dynamic view, but the understanding of consciousness is refined by the inclusion of control parameters that exerted impact to the sociocultural stage of universal evolution. Creativity has a special role to play in this approach. The classification is based on ideas about the real evolution of consciousness and its participation in the global evolutionary process. In such a context, consciousness is understood as a complex self-developing system, but its functioning is conditioned by the cognitive activity of the brain, body, culture, and the world. The article reveals the concepts, in which the explanation of consciousness can be correlated with the global evolutionary approach. They include the emerging modern concepts of embodied cognition, the theory of spatio-temporal neuroscience by G. Nortoff, as well as the concept of consciousness by T. Metzinger. The authors generate the hypothesis about the expediency of using the methodology of the second-order observer to discuss the problem of a unified theory of consciousness. The article indicates the correlation of these theories with the global evolutionary approach, in which the functioning of consciousness is not reduced to neural network structures of the brain, but extended to a view that consciousness is a part of the world and at the same time includes it. Thus, consciousness has a creative evolutionary potential, due to which it builds holistic images and encompasses irrational, creative parameters. The authors suggest a hypothesis about the possibility to combine first-person and third-person studies of consciousness based on the methodology of the second-order observer. In this assumption, they assess consciousness performing the function of an observer on the basis of the methodology of the second-order observer (V.I. Arshinov) and the interpretation of observation as an operation that reproduces the observer (D. Becker). The observer of complexity (the observer of the second order) in this context is consciousness, or rather self-consciousness. The observer simultaneously observes and generates processes, forming a kind of an “assemblage point” of reality, in which the agent-based properties of the observer of complexity are manifested.

Download file
Counter downloads: 63

Keywords

consciousness, cognitive science, complexity, global evolutionary approach, creativity

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Chernikova Irina V.Tomsk State Universitychernic@mail.tsu.ru
Loginovskaya Yuliya V.Tomsk State Universityurucel@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Черникова И.В., Черникова Д.В. Проблема сознания в философии и когнитивной науке // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2016. № 4. С. 103-112.
Baars B.J., Gage N. Cognition, brain, and consciousness: introduction to cognitive neuroscience. 2010. 2nd ed. Burlington, MA : Academic Press. P. 3-32. URL: http://www.baars-gage.com/
Edelman G., Tononi G. A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination. N.Y. : Basic books, 2000. 266 p.
Деан С. Сознание и мозг. Как мозг кодирует мысли. М. : Карьера-Пресс, 2018. 416 c.
Анохин К.В. Мозг, творчество, сознание // Философия творчества: материалы Всерос. науч. конф. 8-9 апреля 2015 г., Институт философии РАН. М. : ИИнтелл, 2015. С. 45-54.
Hameroff S., Penrose R. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR' theory // Phys. Life Review. 2014. March. № 11 (1). P. 39-78.
Stapp H.P. Quantum Mechanical Theories оf Consciousnes // A Companion to Consciousness. Blackwell, 2006. URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/25f3c80w
Меркулов И.П. Эпистемология (когнитивно-эволюционный подход). СПб. : РХГИ, 2003. 583 с.
Хакен Г. Принципы работы головного мозга: Синергетический подход к активности мозга, поведению и когнитивной деятельности. М. : Per Se, 2001. 353 с.
Хакен Г. Тайны восприятия. Синергетика как ключ к мозгу. Ижевск : ИКИ, 2002. 272 с.
Haken H. Synergetics as a Tool for Conceptualization and Mathematization of Cognition and Behavior - How Far Can We Go? // Synergetics of Cognition / Ed. by H. Haken, M. Stadler. Berlin, 1990. P. 2-31.
Матурана У., Варела Ф. Древо познания. М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2001. 224 с.
Popper K.R., Eccles J.C. The Self and Its Brain. London; New York : Routledge. 1998. 597 p.
Князева Е.Н. Нелинейно-динамический подход в эпистемологии // Эволюционная эпистемология. Антология. М. : Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2012. С. 642-693.
McFadden J. Integrating information in the brain's EM field: the cemi field theory of consciousness // Neuroscience of Consciousness. 2020. Vol. 2020, is. 1. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa016
Князева Е.Н. Энактивизм : новая форма конструктивизма в эпистемологии. М. : Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2014. 352 с.
Янч. Э. Самоорганизующаяся Вселенная. Введение и обзор: рождение парадигмы из метафлуктуации // Общественные науки и современность. 1999. № 1. C. 143-158.
Jantsch E. The Self-organizing Universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. Oxford : Pergamon press, 1980. 343 p.
Northoff G. The Spontaneous Brain: From the Mind-Body to the World-Brain Problem. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2018. 536 p.
Northoff G., Cheng K.Y. Levels of Time in the Zhuangzi : A Leibnizian Perspective // Philosophy East and West. 2019. Vol. 69, № 4. Р. 1014-1033.
Метцингер Т. Наука о мозге и миф о своем Я. Тоннель эго. М. : АСТ, 2017. 416 с.
Clark A. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York : Oxford University Press, 2008. 318 p.
Clark A., Chalmers D.J. The Extended Mind // Analysis. 1998. Vol. 58. P. 7-19.
Adams F. Aizawa K. Why the Mind is Still in the Head // The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2009. P. 78-95.
Menary R. The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2010. 382 p.
Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E. The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge (MA) : The MIT Press, 1991. 328 p.
Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2002. № 9. Р. 625-636.
Block N. Consciousness // The Oxford Companion to the Mind / Ed. by Richard L. Gregory. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 1024.
Чалмерс Д. Сознающий ум: В поисках фундаментальной теории. М. : УРСС, 2013. 509 с.
Nagel Т. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford University Press, 2012. 144 p.
McGinn C. Problems in Philosophy - the Limits of Inquiry. Oxford : Blackwell, 1993. 172 p.
Egu'iluz V.M., Chialvo D.R. et al. Scale-free brain functional networks // Physical Review Letters. 2005. № 94 (1). P. 018102
Строгац С. Ритм Вселенной. Как из хаоса возникает порядок. М. : Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2017. 384 с.
Кудряшова Т.Б. К вопросу об онтологии творчества: роль памяти и воображения в появлении нового // Философия творчества : материалы Всерос. науч. конф. 8-9 апреля 2015 г., Институт философии РАН. М. : ИИнтелл, 2015. С. 192-202.
Amundson R. Two concepts of constraint: adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology // Philosophy of Science. 1994. Vol. 61, № 4.
Baecker D. The N-Closure of the Observer // Systemdynamik und Systemethik: Gibt es eine Verantwortung fur soziale Systeme. Munchen : Hampp, 2008. P. 44-52. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2201043
Аршинов В.И., Буданов В.Г. Системы и сети в контексте парадигмы сложности // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 1. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1555
Кастельс М. Власть коммуникации. М. : Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2016. 564 с.
Аршинов В.И., Свирский Я.И. Сложностный мир и его наблюдатель. Часть вторая // Философия науки и техники. 2016. Т. 21, № 1. С. 78-91.
Krishna A., Strack F. Reflection and impulse as determinants of human behavior // Knowledge and action. Springer, Cham, 2017. Р. 145-167. URL: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/5e705012-0d75-4487-afb4747bb0f161ad/1002228.pdf#page=151
 A Global Evolutionary Approach to Consciousness in Cognitive Science | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 466. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/466/8

A Global Evolutionary Approach to Consciousness in Cognitive Science | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 466. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/466/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 551