Cognitive Freedom as a New Political Freedom of the 21st century
In political science, it is rarely possible to work with a topic of extremely significant social problems that has not yet found a proper understanding by the scientific community. This includes the concept of cognitive freedom, which already claims to be the new political freedom of the 21st century but is practically not represented in the scientific discourse. This article does not claim to be a complete theoretical and methodological representation of cognitive freedom as a political freedom, it is only an invitation to a discussion about its essence, features, practical significance, and many other aspects of this unique phenomenon. A review of publications on the topic of cognitive freedom from the point of view of psychological, neuro-ethical, epistemological, and cognitive trends is conducted; the degree of its study is evaluated; and the results obtained are summarized. The author's contribution to the understanding of cognitive freedom was the substantiation of the diffusive concept of cognitive freedom using a combination of two approaches: implicit cognitive science and political diffusionism. The diffusive concept of cognitive freedom can be formulated as follows: cognitive freedom is the freedom of representation, dissemination, and transmission of knowledge or information by individuals in diffusion networks. The concept “knowledge transfer” is introduced, meaning that its dissemination is carried out under conditions of some restriction of freedom in the form of prohibition, influence, pressure. This is the political nature of diffusion that acquires signs of managing or manipulating participants in the interaction. This concept should develop the concept of cognitive freedom in terms of one of the conditions for its implementation - the freedom to present, receive, distribute, and transmit knowledge in diffusion networks (a communication channel through which information and knowledge flow). The practical significance of the diffusive concept of cognitive freedom lies in its suitability for identifying the possibilities of managing the free process of political diffusion. Several cognitive technologies based on the principles of “cognitive control”, which in fact plays the role of a kind of “limiter” or even an obstacle to the freedom of obtaining, storing or distributing knowledge, are described. The types of cognitive technologies are identified: technologies for managing human cognitive abilities at the level of the unconscious, technologies for managing the process of organizing information, technologies for strategic narratives, and framing technology: technologies for managing mnemonic practices, technologies for controlling social media as communicators.
Keywords
cognitive freedom,
political freedom,
cognitive science,
diffusion,
diffusion network,
diffusion concept of cognitive freedomAuthors
Podshibyakina Tat'yana A. | Southern Federal University | tan5@bk.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Sommaggio P., Mazzocca M., Gerola A., Ferro F. Cognitive liberty. A first step towards a human neuro-rights declaration» // Biolaw Journal. 2017. № 3. P. 27-45.
Sententia W. Neuroethical considerations : cognitive liberty and converging technologies for improving human cognition // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2004. Vol. 1013, № 1. P. 221-228.
Bublitz J.C. My mind is mine?! С ognitive liberty as a legal concept // Hildt E., Franke A.G. (Ed.). Cognitive Enhancement: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance. New York ; London : Springer, 2013. P. 233-264.
Sommaggio P., Mazzocca М. Cognitive Liberty and Human Rights // Neuroscience and Law / ed. by A. D'Aloia, M. Errigo. Springer, Cham, 2020. P. 95-111.
Ienca M., Andorno R. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology // Life Sciences, Society and Policy. 2017. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 1-27.
Lakoff G. Whose freedom? The battle over America's most important idea. New York : Picador, 2007.
Popper K. Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1979.
Miller E.K. The prefontral cortex and cognitive control // Nature reviews neuroscience. 2000. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 59-65.
Inzlicht M., Bartholow B.D., Hirsh J.B. Emotional foundations of cognitive control // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2015. Vol. 19, № 3. P. 126-132.
Фурс Л.А. Метапамять, когнитивный мониторинг и когнитивный контроль // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2019. № 2. С. 21-25.
Иванчей И.И. Конференция «Нейронаука и познание: сознание и когнитивный контроль» (Брюссель, 2012) // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика. 2012. № 3. С. 62-65.
Hammond K.R., Summers D.A. Cognitive control // Psychological review. 1972. Vol. 79, № 1. P. 58-67.
Бандура А. Теория социального научения. СПб. : Евразия, 2000.
Баксанский О.Е., Кучер Е.Н. Познание познания: когнитивные науки // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2006. Т. 7, № 1. С. 148-169.
Нестерова М. Когнитивистика: истоки, вызовы, перспективы. Сумы : Университетская книга, 2015.
Анохин К. Гиперсетевая теория мозга и сознания. Курс. Сознание и мозг. Последний рубеж. 2018. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0_Zr1eGVog&feature=youtu.be (дата обращения: 12.11.2020).
Лазутова Н. Мой собеседник - Константин Анохин // Человек. 2014. № 2. С. 86-104.
Анохин К. Наш разум - это гиперсеть // «Троицкий вариант». 2015. Т. 177, № 8. URL: https://omiliya.org/article/konstantin-anohin-nash-razum-eto-giperset (дата обращения: 20.08.2020).
Конституция Российской Федерации с изменениями, принятыми на Общероссийском голосовании 1 июля 2020 года (редакция 2020 года) / ред. В. Обручев. М. : Эксмо, 2020.
Bublitz C. Cognitive liberty or the international human right to freedom of thought // Handbook of Neuroethics / ed. by J. Clausen, N. Levy. Dordrecht : Springer, 2015. P. 1309-1333.
The Journal of Cognitive Liberties. URL: https://www.cognitiveliberty.org/ccle1/jcl/jcl_online.html (дата обращения: 28.08.2020).
The Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics (CCLE). URL: https://www.webcitation.org/666ICKKEl?url=http:// www.cognitiveliberty.org/faqs/faq_general.htm (дата обращения: 28.08.2020).
Boire R.G. On cognitive liberty // The Journal of Cognitive Liberties. 2001. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 7-22.
Bublitz J.C., Merkel R. Crimes Against Minds: On Mental Manipulations, Harms and a Human Right to Mental Self-Determination // Criminal Law and Philosophy. 2014. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 51-77.
Ienca M. The Right to Cognitive Liberty // Scientific American. 2017. Vol. 317, № 2. P. 10.
Blank R.H. Cognitive enhancement: social and public policy issues. New York : Springer, 2015.
Jotterand F., Dubljevic V. (Ed.). Cognitive enhancement: Ethical and policy implications in international perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2016.
Bostrom N., Roache R. Smart policy: cognitive enhancement in the public interest // Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice. 2010. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 68-84.
Walsh C. Psychedelics and cognitive liberty: Reimagining drug policy through the prism of human rights // International Journal of Drug Policy. 2016. Vol. 9. P. 80-87.
Fletcher A.L. Make up your own mind: the politics of cognitive freedom // Somit A., Peterson S.A. (Ed.). Biopolicy: The Life Sciences and Public Policy. (Research in Biopolitics, Vol. 10). Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012. P. 225-242.
Санжаревский И.И. Политическая наука: словарь-справочник. 2010. URL: https://rus-politology-dict.slovaronline.com/(дата обращения: 20.08.2020).