The Integrative Result of Education in the Context of Discipline-Based Differentiation of Its Content
The article actualizes the problem, which is important within the framework of the competency-based approach, of the integrative result of education in the context of the traditional disciplinary division of the content of vocational training. Theoretical and experimental studies in which the problem of integration is considered in the development of personal and interpersonal competencies simultaneously with the formation of disciplinary knowledge in the fields of physics, chemistry, and mathematics are analyzed. The aim of the study is to identify and use integration objects in the educational process. Learning outcomes are essential to any curriculum in education; they need to be clear, observable and measurable. The use of integration objects will allow forming and evaluating the integrative result of education in the process of mastering the disciplines of the science module. The study is carried out using systemic, epistemological, synergistic, and informational approaches. Materials of the research were scientific articles on the research problem, documents on the ideology of the CDIO Worldwide Initiative. A hypothesis has been put forward and theoretically grounded on the possibility of the student's intellectual development to solve problems and create products based on integrative knowledge and methods of activity. Student learning outcomes have long been established as an important component in developing discipline-based content, communicating expectations to students, and designing effective assessments. The following integration objects are highlighted: the content of the educational process; semantic universals (system, state, process, interaction, result, development, etc.), systems of scientific concepts, laws, theories, ideas in their dialectical unity. A method and means of evaluating the integrative learning outcomes based on the students' solution of a project task is proposed. The assumption about the impact of integrated learning on the motivational component of learning is tested. The study shows the relevance of the problem of integrative education (multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary) and opens up a significant area of educational practice that allows removing the contradiction between the disciplinary dissection and the integrative nature of a person. The obtained results also revealed increased motivation among students to embrace new grading approaches.
Keywords
integration in education,
integrative result of education,
discipline-based differentiation,
CDIO,
science module,
STEAM education,
engineering task,
design activityAuthors
| Gafurova Nataliya V. | Siberian Federal University | gafurnv@yandex.ru |
| Osipova Svetlana I. | Siberian Federal University | osisi@yandex.ru |
| Dubova Irina V. | Siberian Federal University | idubova@mail.ru |
| Esin Roman V. | Siberian Federal University | surgeon14@mail.ru |
Всего: 4
References
Kans M., Gustafsson A. Analyzing the meaning of interdisciplinary in the CDIO context // Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference. Turku : Turku University of Applied Sciences, 2016. P. 962-973. URL: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:933139/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Renate G. Klaassen Interdisciplinary education: a case study // European Journal of Engineering Education. 2018. P. 19. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1442417
Двуличанская Н. Н., Фадеев Г. Н. Бакалавриат в техническом университете: проблемы и пути их решения // Высшее образование в России. 2018. Т. 27, № 3. С. 96-103. URL: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1317/1096
Middlehurst R., Teixeira P.N. Governance within the EHEA: dynamic trends, common challenges, and national particularities // European higher education at the crossroads, Springer, Dordrecht. 2012. P. 527-551. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-3937-6_29
Harman K., Meek V.L.Introduction to special issue: Merger revisited: international perspectives on mergers in higher education // Higher Educa tion. 2002. Vol. 44, № 1. P. 1-4. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014929121367
Wang X.A. A policy analysis of the financing of higher education in China: Two decades reviewed // Journal of Higher Education Policy and Man agement. 2002. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 205-217. DOI: 10.1080/13600800120088698
Harman G. Institutional amalgamations and abolition of the binary system in Australia under John Dawkins // Higher Education Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 45, № 2. Р. 176-198. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.1991.tb01566.x
Pinheiro R., Stensaker B. Designing the entrepreneurial university: The interpretation of a global idea // Public Organization Review. 2014. Vol. 14, № 4. P. 497-516. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-013-0241-z
Ursin J., Aittola H., Henderson C., Valimaa J. Is education getting lost in university mergers? // Tertiary Education and Management. 2010. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 327-340. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2010.533379
Kyvik S., Stensaker B. Factors Affecting the Decision to Merge: The case of strategic mergers in Norwegian higher education // Tertiary Education and Management. 2013. Vol. 19, № 4. P. 323-337. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2013.805424
Yin W. et al. Zijin Mode: Industry and Education Deep Integration in Mining Engineering // International Journal of Georesources and Environment-IJGE. 2018. Vol. 4, № 3. P. 64-68. DOI: 10.15273/ijge.2018.03.011
Matinde E. Enhancing the Entrepreneurial and Intrapreneurial Attributes of Engineering Graduates: A Review Proposal for Metallurgy and Materials Engineering Undergraduate Curricula at Two African Universities // Education Sciences. 2019. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 4. DOI: 10.3390/educsci9010004
Tan S.Y. et al. Rethinking Our Education to Face the New Industry Era // Proceedings of EDULEARN18 Conference, Palma, Mallorca, Spain. 2018. P. 6562-6571. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sin_Ying_Tan2/publication/326713638_RETHINKING_OUR_EDUCATION_TO_FACE_THE_NEW_INDUSTRY_ERA/links/5b912a7392851c6b7ecb40fa/RETHINKING-OUR-EDUCATION-TO-FACE-THE-NEW-INDUSTRY-ERA.pdf
Herr D.J.C. et al. Convergence education an international perspective // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2019. Vol. 21, № 11. P. 229. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-019-4638-7
Smertenko P., Dimitriev O., Pochekailova L. Technological transformations and their implications for higher education // Sustainable Futures for Higher Education. 2018. P. 67-75. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96035-7_8
Liu X., Liu C. Research on the Teaching Reform of the NEET-oriented Engineering Training // 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education and Social Science Research (ICAESSR 2019). Atlantis Press, 2019. URL: https://download.atlantis-press.com/article/125917386.pdf
De la Barra E., Veloso S., Maluenda L.Integrating assessment in a CLIL-based approach for second-year university students // Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development. 2018. Vol. 20 (2). P. 111-126. DOI: 10.15446/profile.v20n2.66515
Morgado M., Gaspar M., Regio M.Interdisciplinarity and collaboration in higher education engineering courses // Journal of Education Culture and Society. 2018. Vol. 9, № 2. P. 179-186. DOI: 10.15503/jecs20182.179.186
Thibaut L., Ceuppens S., De Loof H. et al.Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education // European Journal of STEM Education. 2018. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 2. DOI: 10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Arnautov A., Gafurova N., Fedoseev A., Fadeev Y. Fostering Engineering Thinking with Curriculum Integrated STEM Game // Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference. 2013. DOI: 10.11575/PRISM/10230
Rolling Jr.J.H. STEAM locomotion // Art Education. 2016. Vol. 69, № 6. P. 4. DOI: 10.1080/00043125.2016.1224811
Al-Atabi M. Inculcating CDIO skills at pre-degree level // Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference. 2012. P. 4. URL: http://www.webmail.orbiter.cdio.org/files/document/file/inculcating_cdio_skills_at_the_pre-degree_level_.pdf
Enqvist M. et al. The CDIO Initiative from an automatic control project course perspective // IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2005. Vol. 38, № 1. P. 67-72. URL: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:316722/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Lundblad J., Kari L., Ostlund S.Integrating CDIO experiences into a new program environment // 3rd International CDIO Conference. MIT, USA, 2007. URL: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:468467/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Dale S.G. et al. Towards a more methodical approach to teaching senior chemistry // Teaching Science. 2018. Vol. 64, № 3. P. 21. URL: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=841513638503888;res=IELHSS
Rechistov G., Plotkin A.Computer engineering educational projects of mipt-intel laboratory in the context of cdio // Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. 2014. URL: http://rocketship.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdf
Valmu H. et al. Optimizing the project based student paths in Helsinki Metropolia UAS // Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Barcelona, Spain, 2014. URL: http://jrez.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/22/22_Paper.pdf
Genc B., Mitra R. Mine Planning and Design for Mining Engineering learners at Wits University // The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2018. P. 865-868.
Yu-Chiung Hsu, Ya-Ming Shiue. Exploring the Influence of Using Collaborative Tools on the Community of Inquiry in an Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning Context // EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2018. Vol. 14. P. 933-945. DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/81149
Дубова И. В., Саначева Г. С., Осипова С. И. Роль взаимодействия вуз-производство в организации проектного обучения при подготовке инженеров // Черные металлы. 2019. № 8. С. 72-78.
Купавцев А.В. Тематические кластеры в образовании // Высшее образование в России. 2018. Т. 27, № 11. С. 85-89. DOI: 10.31992/08693617-2018-27-11-85-89
Гордеева О., Сычев О.А., Осин Е.Н. Опросник «Шкалы академической мотивации» // Психологический журнал. 2014. Т. 35, № 4. С. 96 URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Evgeny_Osin/publication/ 287265976_Academic_motivation_scales_questionnaire/links/567883fe08ae502c99d57360/Academic-motivation-scales-questionnaire.pdf
