Ceramic Casting Molds from the Kruglaya Dolina Site in the Primorye Region: A Case of an Interdisciplinary Study | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 470. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/470/16

Ceramic Casting Molds from the Kruglaya Dolina Site in the Primorye Region: A Case of an Interdisciplinary Study

The article presents an interdisciplinary study of casting molds as one of the kinds of old technical (“metalworking”) ceramics. The material of the study is ceramic molds (47 whole and fragmented samples) unearthed at the Kruglaya Dolina settlement in the central Primorye region. The molds and other objects of technical ceramics (crucibles, nozzle) were found in destroyed, non-stratified cultural deposits and connected with the remains of bronze-casting workshops complex which was dated supposedly to the Bohai state period, 698-926. The study aimed (1) to examine the morphological and technological characteristics of the molds, and (2) to detect traces of alloys at the working surfaces of the molds. The study employed methods of binocular microscopy and laboratory refiring testing for (1), and scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), portable X-Ray fluorescence spectroscopy (pXRF) for (2). The analyzed ceramic molds were intended for the casting of semi-spherical buttons, several kinds of pendants, rosette-shaped openwork ornaments. Original bronze items which could be cast in these molds were not found at Kruglaya Dolina. According to the data on the morphological variability of the molds together with the results of the examination of the ceramic pastes technology, one can suppose that the casting molds were produced by different craftsmen or different workshops. SEM-EDS and pXRF analyses detected the traces of bronze alloys at 15 mold samples with carbonized working surfaces. Chemical elements - metals - lead (Pb), tin (Sn), and copper (Cu) are traced in various combinations at various samples. In some cases together with metals arsenic (As) is detected. The interpretation of these results follows methodological recommendations based on the published data of experimental research. The presence of certain elements can be stated, and their relative concentrations in the spectrum composition can be evaluated. However, it is necessary to take into account that the amounts of certain elements in the spectrum do not correspond to their amounts in the original alloy composition. Therefore, qualitative characteristics of the alloys can be determined, but not quantitative ones. According to the results, the three-component alloys containing copper, tin, and lead are recognized certainly. The tin-copper non-lead alloy and the “pure copper” alloy are supposed in some cases. Previous investigations on the old bronzes chemical compositions in southern Russian Far East revealed that three-component alloys (lead-tin-copper) containing arsenic had been used widely during the Bohai state period. Tin-copper and “pure copper” alloys were known at that time as well. It seems to be likely that the casting molds from the Kruglaya Dolina site are dated to the Bohai state period. Further researches of this site's bronze-casting workshops complex remains will focus on other categories of technical ceramics.

Download file
Counter downloads: 38

Keywords

bronze-casting craft, period of Bohai state, natural sciences methods, technical ceramics

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Zhushchikhovskaya Irina S.Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the Peoples of the Far-East, Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciencesirina1zh@mail.ru
Buravlev Igor Yu.Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Far Eastern Federal Universityburavlev.i@gmail.com / buravlev_igor@yahoo.com
Всего: 2

References

Кренке Н.А., Тавлинцева Е.Ю. Литейные формы с Дьякова городища // Российская археология. 2002. № 4. C. 90-110.
Лопатина О.А. Технологическая характеристика глиняных литейных форм Дьякова городища // Российская археология. 2002. № 4. C. 111-112.
Дураков И.А., Кобелева Л.С. Техническая керамика кротовской культуры Центральной Барабы // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2017. № 49. С. 23-25.
Kearns T., Martinon-Torres M., Rehren Th. Metal to mold: alloy identification in experimental casting molds using XRF // Historical Metallurgy. 2010. Vol. 44, № 1. P. 48-58.
Liu S., Wang K., Cai Q., Chen J. Microscopic study of Chinese bronze casting molds from the Eastern Zhou period // Journal of Archaeological Science. 2013. Vol. 40. P. 2402-2414.
Zong Y., Yao Sh., Lang J., Chen X., et al. Structural and compositional analysis of a casting mild shard from ancient China // PLoS ONE. 2017. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 1-13.
Molodin V.I., Myl'nikova L.N., Shtertser N.V., Durakov I.A., Drebushchak V.A. Thermogravimetry in the Studies of Ancient Technical Ceramics // Chemistry for Sustainable Development. 2019. Vol. 27. P. 101-108.
Конькова Л.В. Бронзолитейное производство на юге Дальнего Востока СССР. Рубеж II-I тыс. до н.э. - XIII век н.э. Л. : Наука, 1989. 123 с.
Леньков В.Д., Семениченко Л.Е., Хорев В.А., Следы металлургического производства на раннесредневековом поселении в долине р. Арсеньевка // Вопросы истории и культуры народов Дальнего Востока. Владивосток, 1974. Вып.2. С. 96-103.
Татарников В.А. Стоянка Водораздельная - новый памятник Северо-Восточного Приморья // Материалы по археологии Дальнего Востока СССР. Владивосток : Изд-во ДВНЦ АН СССР, 1981. С. 41-50.
Thuesen I., Oldenburg E., Iorgensen K. Microscope section analysis of pottery // Paleorient. 1989. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 273-278.
Santacreu D.A. Identifying spathic calcite recipe in archaeological ceramics: possibilities and limitations // Ceramica. 2014. Vol. 60. P. 379-391.
Shepard A.O. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Washington, D.C. : Carnegie Institute press, 1985. 414 p.
Жущиховская И. С. Опыт применения электронной микроскопии в изучении археологической керамики юга Дальнего Востока // Записки Института истории материальной культуры. 2017. № 16. C. 75-91.
Дегтярева А.Д. Методика поверхностного изучения цветного металла // Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии. 2006. № 6. C. 117-126.
Мягкая И.Н., Сарыг-оол Б.Ю., Лазарева Е.А. Связь корреляций меди, цинка, селена, бария, ртути, серебра и золота в веществе потока рассеяния Урского хвостохранилища с его минеральным составом (Россия. Кемеровская область) // Вестник ВГУ. Серия: Геология. 2016. № 2. C. 122-132.
Mandal B., Datta P.K. Hot mold casting process of ancient East India and Bangladesh // China Foundry. 2010. Vol. 7, № 2. P. 171-177.
Sahlen D. Ceramic Evidence from Non-ferrous Metallurgy in the Malaren Valley during the Viking Age // Prehistoric Pottery Across the Baltic / ed. by P.E. Petterssen / BAR S2785. Oxford, 2016. P. 75-80.
Freestone I.A., Middleton A.P., Meeks N.D. Significance of phosphate in ceramic bodies: discussion on paper by Bollong et al. // Journal of Archaeological Science. 1994. Vol. 21. P. 425-426.
 Ceramic Casting Molds from the Kruglaya Dolina Site in the Primorye Region: A Case of an Interdisciplinary Study | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 470. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/470/16

Ceramic Casting Molds from the Kruglaya Dolina Site in the Primorye Region: A Case of an Interdisciplinary Study | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 470. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/470/16

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 515