Investigating the Use of a MOOC as a Component of a University Language Course | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 473. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/473/21

Investigating the Use of a MOOC as a Component of a University Language Course

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been gaining popularity both in the formal educational sector and among individuals who want to gain new skills. MOOCs provide access to up-to-date learning materials and the best instructors, help develop learners' self-regulation and time-management skills. When integrated into a discipline, MOOCs bring in variety and novelty. Despite the growing popularity of MOOCs, their use in the context of tertiary education in Russia is underresearched. This study aims to explore the experience of the use of a language MOOC as a component of a university Advanced English course. 269 bachelor students at National Research University Higher School of Economics took a pre-test before they engaged in the MOOC in a self-study mode and completed a post-test after they finished the online course. To assess the effectiveness of the integration, the researchers compared pre-test and post-test results. The comparison demonstrated a moderate gain in the students' grammatical skills: there is a growth from 10.745 points as the average result exhibited in the pre-test (Md=10, Me=11, SD=2.29) to 14.3 points as the average of the final test (Md=15, Me=15, SD=1.928, Max=16). The most considerable gain was observed in the abilities to recognize errors in parallel constructions, to identify the correct and incorrect use of punctuation in complex sentences, to paraphrase with inversion. A questionnaire administered to investigate the students' perceptions of the experience yielded contradictory results. On the one hand, the majority of students evaluated the experience of MOOC integration as positive and successful. Though the course content was not completely new to the students (M=3.1), the students found the MOOC quite useful (M=3.7). The students named such advantages of MOOCs as the opportunities to revise and recycle the known material, its structured and multimodal delivery, flexibility and convenience of the instructional format. In their opinion, MOOC materials are comprehensive, clear, detailed and accessible to learners with varied backgrounds. However, the students mentioned the lack of contact with the instructor and peers and the need for additional practice. According to the Community of Inquiry framework, cognitive, social and teaching presence define the success of online education. The students' cognitive and social engagement was incomplete as they engaged with MOOC materials mostly receptively without the opportunity to have communicative practice. To conclude, MOOCs can be successfully integrated into university language courses, as students embrace them as an opportunity to diversify the learning experience through the engagement with multimodal materials and new instructors. Students value the individualization of the learning experience MOOCs provide. The experience can be enriched if students can discuss the materials and get the discipline instructor's feedback to ensure their cognitive and social engagement.

Download file
Counter downloads: 45

Keywords

MOOC, Massive Open Online Course, blended learning, Community of Inquiry framework, cognitive presence, social presence, cognitive engagement, social engagement

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Bogolepova Svetlana V.National Research University Higher School of Economicssbogolepova@hse.ru / bogolepovasv@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Попова Т.П., Малинина И.А. Использование онлайн-курса как компонента технологии смешанного обучения иностранным языкам в неязыковом вузе // Педагогика и психология образования. 2020. № 1. С. 125-145. doi: 10.31862/2500-297X-2020-1-125-145
Карной М., Кузьминов Я.И. Онлайн-обучение: как оно меняет структуру образования и экономику университета // Вопросы образования. 2015. № 3. С. 8-43. doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-3-8-43
Ding Y., Shen H. Delving into learner autonomy in an EFL MOOC in China: a case study // Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2019. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1681464
Watson W.R., Yu J.H., Watson S.L. Perceived attitudinal learning in a self-paced versus fixed-schedule МООК // Educational Media International. 2018. Vol. 55, № 2. P. 170-181. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2018.1484044
Титова С.В. МООК в российском образовании // Высшее образование в России. 2015. № 12. С. 145-151.
Moura V.F., Souza C.A., Viana A.B.N. The use of Massive Open ОпН^ Courses (MOOCs) in blended learning courses and the functional value perceived by students // Computers & Education. 2021. Vol. 161. Art. № 104077. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104077
Israel МД. Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students // The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015. Vol. 16, № 5. P. 102-118. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077803.pdf
Hew K.F., Hu X., Qiao C., Tang Y. What predicts student satisfaction with MOOCs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach // Computers & Education. 2020. Vol. 145. Art. № 103724. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103724
Al-Rahmi W., Aldraiweesh A., Yahaya N., Kamin Y.B., Zeki А.М. Massive Open ОпН^ Courses (MOOCs): Data on higher education // Data in Brief. 2019. Vol. 22. P. 118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.139
Deng R., Benckendorff P., Gannaway D. Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs // Computers & Education. 2019. Vol. 129. P. 48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019
DeBoer J., Ho A.D., Stump G.S., Breslow L. Changing “Course”: Reconceptualizing Educational Variables for Massive Open ОпН^ Courses // Educational Researcher. 2014. Vol. 43, № 2. P. 74-84. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14523038
Jong P.G^. de, Pickering J.D., Hendriks R.A., Swinnerton B.J., Goshtasbpour F., Reinders М^Д. Twelve tips for integrating massive open online course content into classroom teaching // Medical Teacher. 2020. Vol. 42, № 4. P. 393-397. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1571569
Vorobyeva A.A. Language acquisition through massive open online courses (MOOCs): Opportunities and restrictions in educational university environment // Xlinguae. 2018. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 136-146. doi: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.11
Борщева В.В. Современные подходы к преподаванию в университете иностранного языка для специальных целей // Педагогика и психология образования. 2020. № 2. С. 73-82. doi: 10.31862/2500-297X-2020-2-73-82
Титова С.В. Массовые онлайн-курсы в российском образовании: миф или реальность? // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 19. Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2016. № 1. C. 53-62.
Титова С.В., Александрова К.В. Теоретико-методические основы использования электронных образовательных ресурсов в обучении иностранному языку // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 19. Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2018. № 3. C. 113-123.
Чекун О.А. Интеграция массовых открытых онлайн-курсов в обучение иностранному языку студентов неязыковых специальностей МПГУ // Педагогика и психология образования. 2016. № 1. С. 71-74.
Stognieva О. Teaching the university ESP course with the MOOC component: Putting ideas into practice // The Journal of Asia TEFL. 2019. Vol. 6, № 1. P. 437-447. doi: 10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.34.437
Griffiths R., Chingos M., Mulhern C., Spies R.Interactive online learning on campus: Testing MOOCs and other platforms in hybrid formats in the University System of Maryland (ITHAKA S+R Report). 2014. URL: http://www.sr.ithaka.org/sites/default/files/reports/SR_Interac-tive_Online_Learning_Campus_20140716.pdf
Garrison D.R., Anderson T., Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education // The Internet and Higher Education. 1999. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 87-105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Alqurashi E. Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments // Distance Education. 2019. Vol. 40, № 1. P. 133-148. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Kahu E.R. Framing student engagement in higher education // Studies in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 38, № 5. P. 758-773. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Bralic A., Divjak B.Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: Achieving learning outcomes with blended learning // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2018. Vol. 15, № 2. URL: https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/integrating-moocs-in-traditionally-taught-courses-achieving-lear/15439238?fulltextView=true
Ragusa A.T., Crampton A. Sense of connection, identity, and academic success in distance education: Sociologically exploring online learning environments // Rural Society. 2018. Vol. 27, № 2. P. 125-142. doi: 10.1080/10371656.2018.1472914
Wang K., Zhu Ch. MOOC-based flipped learning in higher education: students' participation, experience and learning performance // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 16, № 33. URL: https://d-nb.info/1202079032/34
Garrison D.R., Anderson T., Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education // American Journal of Distance Education. 2001. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 7-23. doi: 10.1080/08923640109527071
Alamri H., Lowell V., Watson W., Watson S.L. Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation // Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2020. Vol. 52, № 3. P. 322352. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
 Investigating the Use of a MOOC as a Component of a University Language Course | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 473. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/473/21

Investigating the Use of a MOOC as a Component of a University Language Course | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021. № 473. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/473/21

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 490