“Sacred monsters”: Toward the characterology of Iris Murdoch | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2022. № 477. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/477/3

“Sacred monsters”: Toward the characterology of Iris Murdoch

The article examines a special type of characters that is constant for Iris Murdoch's novels throughout her career and is best described as “sacred monsters”. The peculiarities of this type of characters are revealed, the motifs and plot complex and narrative techniques associated with them are described, and their functions are demonstrated. Conclusions are made about their connection with the moral philosophy of Murdoch and with the themes of destructive illusions and life's contingency which are the most important for this writer. In the course of the analysis of Murdoch's early and later novels, it is shown that a hero of this type is the center of attraction - both inside the world of characters, that is, for the heroes, and outside it, for the reader, since the horizon of the reader's expectations is bound with such a character, the main motifs are usually “tied” to him (or her), and the plot unravels with his or her direct participation. These are characters-magicians with inexplicable power over the souls of other people, for whom they are always shrouded in a veil of secrecy. Such characters are surrounded by rumors, innuendoes, riddles. They are associated with an “alien” world; a marker of this “alienness” can be a violation of a taboo. The actions and the very existence of these characters are described in terms of “witchcraft”, “magic”, “fairy tale”. Their inherent power and knowledge do not turn out to be illusory, a case of “collective self-deception”, but they leave clear signs of their reality. The intervention of such heroes in the lives of other characters can be both beneficial and disastrous in its consequences. In their images of the savior and the monster, there is an irremovable ambivalence. The “sacred monsters”, endowed with seemingly great power and knowledge, are not omniscient and not omnipotent. Ultimately, they are unable to subjugate reality, which exists according to its own incomprehensible laws. Even more often than other characters, they turn out to be incapable of being happy, and sometimes they experience a real fiasco. The main “beneficiaries” in Murdoch's novels are not “enchanters”, whatever their power over other characters is, but heroes-writers, because, in her opinion, only art takes a person out of a small personal world into the wide real world, helps to get rid of illusions, fantasies - and in this sense it is close to the Good. Ultimately, the “sacred monsters” appear as personalizations of the central myth in Murdoch's work, that is, Plato's myth of the cave. The prisoners of the cave (i.e. life) are unable to look at the light itself because the sun hurts their eyes, but they contemplate the reflected light embodied in the heroes of this type. Therefore, the “sacred monsters” themselves are not the final instance of Murdoch's novels, but the same prisoners of reality. But through relationships with them, defined primarily by love, some other characters are sometimes able to look at the sun, i.e. to know the truth and the Good.

Download file
Counter downloads: 22

Keywords

Iris Murdoch, enchanter, secret knowledge, East, Good, Plato, myth of cave

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Zuseva-Ozkan Veronika B.Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciencesv.zuseva.ozkan@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Iris Murdoch, Philosopher: A Collection of Essays / ed. by J. Broackes. Oxford, 2012.
Iris Murdoch and the Search for Human Goodness / eds. by M. Antonaccio, W. Schweiker. Chicago ; London, 1996.
Robjant D. As a Buddhist Christian: the Misappropriation of Iris Murdoch // The Heythrop Journal. 2011. № 70. P. 993-1008.
Iris Murdoch, Gender and Philosophy. New York ; London, 2012.
Altorf M. Iris Murdoch, or What It Means To Be A Serious Philosopher // Dannon. Revista Internacional de Filosofia. 2013. № 60. P. 75-91.
Moore S.H. Murdoch's Fictional Philosophers: What They Say and What They Show // Rowe A., Horner A. Iris Murdoch and Morality. London, 2010. P. 101-113.
Ивашева В. В. Роман с философской тенденцией: Айрис Мердок. Уильям Голдинг // Ивашева В. В. Что сохраняет время: литература Великобритании 1945-1977. М., 1979. С. 161-183.
Ивашева В.В. От Сартра к Платону // Вопросы литературы. 1969. № 11. С. 134-155.
Мадорская Н.Я. Концепция личности в философско-психологическом романе Айрис Мердок: От первых опытов к «Ученику философа» : дис.. канд. филос. наук. СПб., 1997.
Мизинина И.Н. Романы А. Мердок конца 60-х - начала 70-х гг.: Идеи философии Платона в зеркале художественной структуры : дис. канд. филол. наук. М., 1991.
Phillips D. The Challenge of the Past: Iris Murdoch and the Legacy of the Great Nineteenth-Century Novelists // Caliban. 1990. № 27. P. 73-81.
Conradi P.J. Iris Murdoch and “Shakespeare the Novelist” // Iris Murdoch Review. 2016. № 7. P. 29-38.
Conradi P.J. Iris Murdoch's ‘Negative Capability' and the Question of Influence // Etudes britanniques contenporaines. 2020. № 59. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ebc/9613
Pearson G. Iris Murdoch and the Ronantic Novel // New Left Review. 1962. № 13-14. Р. 137-145.
Байрамкулова Л.К. Поэтика Айрис Мердок в свете проблемы интертекстуальности: Мердок и Шекспир : дис. канд. филол. наук. Нальчик, 2005.
Пирудян А.А. Структура романов Айрис Мердок и комедии Шекспира // Английская литература XX в. и наследие Шекспира. М., 1997. С. 120-132.
Чебинева В.А. Развитие традиций Л. Стерна в творчестве В. Вульф и А. Мердок : дис. канд. филол. наук. Казань, 2003.
Honer A. ‘Refinenents of Evil': Iris Murdoch and the Gothic // Iris Murdoch and Morality / eds. by A. Rowe, A. Horner. London, 2010. P. 70-84.
Sullivan Z.T. The Contracting Universe of Iris Murdoch's Gothic Novels // Modern Fiction Studies. 1977-1978. № 23. Р. 557-569.
Nakanishi W. Jones. A Severed Head: As Freudian Drana and as Restoration Conedy // English Studies. 2010. № 91:8. Р. 884-892.
Малишевская Н. А. Жанровое своеобразие романов Айрис Мердок: к проблеме пародирования жанровых моделей в современной метапрозе : дис. канд. филол. наук. Ростов н/Д, 2001.
Byatt A.S. Degrees of Freedon: The Early Novels of Iris Murdoch. London, 1965.
Conradi P.J. Iris Murdoch: the Saint and the Artist. London, 1986.
Brugnans E. Poetry in the Novels of Iris Murdoch // Philosophy and Literature. 2013. Vol. 37, № 1. Р. 88-101.
Урнов М.В. Айрис Мердок: литература и мистификация // Вопросы литературы. 1984. № 11. С. 78-105.
Осипенко Е.А. Принципы игровой поэтики в романах Айрис Мердок 50-80 годов : дис.. канд. филол. наук. Балашов, 2004.
Никифорова А.Н. Поэтика романов Айрис Мердок 1950-х годов : дис.. канд. филол. наук. Уфа, 2007.
Garner D. On the Centennial of Iris Murdoch's Birth, Renenbering a 20th-Century Giant // The New York Tines. 25 June 2019. URL: https://www.nytines.con/2019/06/25/books/iris-nurdoch-centennial.htnl
Тимонина Т.Ю. Поэтология света и тьмы в творчестве А. Мердок (на материале романов конца 1960-х - 1970-х годов) : дис.. канд. филол. наук. Калининград, 2016.
Woo E.A. The Enchanter Figure in the Novels of Iris Murdoch : a Thesis. for the Degree of Master of Arts. Vancouver, BC, 1974.
Мердок А. Бегство от волшебника / пер. И. Трудолюбовой. М., 2003.
Мердок А. Дилемма Джексона / пер. И. Дорониной. М., 2002.
Nakanishi W. Jones, Shakespeare and Buddhis n in Bruno's Dream. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291167248_%27Shakespeare_and_Buddhisn_in_Bruno%27s_Drean%27
Мердок А. Море, море / пер. М. Лорие. М., 2004.
Мердок А. Дитя слова / пер. Т. Кудрявцевой. М., 2001.
Мердок А. Суверенность блага / пер. Е. Востриковой и Ю. Кульгавчук // Логос. 2008. № 1 (64). С. 117-137.
Мердок А. Время ангелов / пер. И. Трудолюбовой. М., 2008.
 “Sacred monsters”: Toward the characterology of Iris Murdoch | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2022. № 477. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/477/3

“Sacred monsters”: Toward the characterology of Iris Murdoch | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2022. № 477. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/477/3

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 551