Intersectional approach in the study of trajectories of sociocultural integration of people with migration experience | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2022. № 478. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/478/8

Intersectional approach in the study of trajectories of sociocultural integration of people with migration experience

This article proposes to consider the theoretical and methodological framework of the intersectional approach to the study of migration experience, discrimination and problems of sociocultural integration in general. The article describes an intersectional model of modern capitalist society, which is divided into micro and macro contexts of inequality production. Class, race, ethnicity, gender, and physicality can be viewed as structural positions (statuses) that produce unequal access to labor markets, distribution of income and public goods, and form cultural and social distance between different groups of people, including between the host society and migrants. In intersectional logic, the intersection of statuses generates a system of oppression (domination matrix), which allows a new assessment of the risks and potential of incorporated capitals. Migration experience is heterogeneous, due to the intersection of different statuses (gender, corporeality, ethnicity, race, class), it can have different effects in terms of producing inequality. Social inequality within the migration community (intracategory analysis of the social group of migrants) determines the direction of the trajectories of integration; they will be completely different, taking into account the intersection of statuses for one or another considered social subgroup. It is more and more difficult for people with migration experience to concentrate on the integration process under the influence of two groups of factors: (a) the availability of the digital information environment and transport, which make it possible to maintain intensive contact with the culture and language of the country of origin; (b) lack of an effective integration infrastructure (inclusive, transparent conditions for integration) and xenophobia of the host society. An analytical review of the social, cultural, theoretical prerequisites for the emergence and development of the intersectional approach allows assessing the prospects for intersectionality both in the context of social policy and in the field of academic research of issues at the intersection of diversity, discrimination and integration. With reference to the empirical material of the author's own qualitative research, an attempt is made to conceptually reflect the applicability of this approach in the conditions of Russian society. On the one hand, the ideas that are described in the framework of the intersectional approach seem quite obvious, but at the same time they are classic for the sociological theory of stratification and for the understanding of the root causes of existing inequalities.

Download file
Counter downloads: 29

Keywords

intersectional approach, sociocultural integration, people with migration experience, social inequality, social movements

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Mikheev Igor S.National Research University Higher School of Economicsmikheevigst@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Kivisto P. Incorporating diversity: Rethinking assimilation in a multicultural age. Routledge, 2015. 256 с.
Куропятник М.С. Суперразнообразие: реконфигурация культурной сложности контекстов современности // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2020. Т. 20, № 3. С. 461-470.
Lie J. From international migration to transnational diaspora // Contemporary Sociology. 1995. Т. 24, № 4. С. 303-306.
Левада Центр. Ксенофобия и национализм. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2020/09/23/ksenofobiya-i-natsionalizm-2/(дата обращения: 10.10.2021).
Pfeffer D. The integration of groups // Ethnicities. 2014. Т. 14, № 3. С. 351-370.
Козлова М.А. Транснационализм в контексте образования: ориентиры адаптации и интеграции в условиях поликультурной образовательной среды // Высшее образование сегодня. 2018. № 3. С. 62-67.
Козлова М.А., Михеев И.С. Управление многообразиемв эпоху транснационализма: перспективы и ограничения в образовательном пространстве // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2020. Т. 18, № 4. С. 657-672.
Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом: пер. с нем. и англ. М. : Российская политическая энциклопедия, 2004. С. 530-550.
Standing G. The precariat // Contexts. 2014. Т. 13, № 4. С. 10-12.
Bittman M. et al. When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work // American Journal of sociology. 2003. Т. 109, № 1. С. 186-214.
Cotter D. A. et al. The glass ceiling effect // Social forces. 2001. Vol. 80, № 2. С. 655-681.
Fisher B., Naidoo R. The Geography of Gender Inequality // PLOS ONE. 2016. Vol. 11, № 3. С. 1-10.
Аникин В.А. Социальная стратификация по жизненным шансам: попытка операционализации для массовых опросов // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2018. № 4 (146). С. 39-67.
Тихонова Н.Е. Ресурсный подход как новая теоретическая парадигма в стратификационных исследованиях // Journal of Economic Sociology. 2006. Т. 7, №. 3. С. 11-26.
Alcoff L. et al. (ed.). Identity politics reconsidered. Springer, 2006. С. 31-54.
Bernstein M. Identity politics // Annual Review of Sociology. 2005. Vol. 31. С. 47-74.
Wright E.O. The comparative project on class structure and class consciousness An Overview // Acta Sociologica. 1989. № 1. C. 3-22.
Пархоменко Р.Н. Теория делиберативной демократии Ю. Хабермаса // Философия и культура. 2012. № 4. С. 40-49.
Benhabib S. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton University Press, 2002. C. 82-105.
Солдатова Е.Л., Погорелов Д.Н. Феномен виртуальной идентичности: современное состояние проблемы // Образование и наука. 2018. Т. 20, №. 5. С. 105-124.
Фуко М., Автономова Н.С., Визгин В.П. Слова и вещи. 1977. 487 с.
Ortner S.B. Is female to male as nature is to culture? // Feminist studies. 1972. Т. 1, №. 2. С. 5-31.
Gayle R. The Traffic in Women: Notes on the "Political Economy" of Sex. 1975. С. 157-210.
Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics // University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989. 139 c.
Crenshaw K. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color // Stanford Law Review. 1991. Vol. 43, №. 6. P. 1241-1299.
Burkner H.J.Intersectionality: How gender studies might inspire the analysis of social inequality among migrants // Population, space and place. 2012. Vol. 18, № 2. P. 181-195.
Choo H.Y., Ferree M.M. Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities // Sociological theory. 2010. Vol. 28, № 2. P. 129-149.
McCall L.Complex inequality: Gender, class, and race in the new economy // Psychology Press. 2001. 210 c.
Winker G., Degele N.Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality // European Journal of Women's Studies. 2011. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 51-66.
Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster, 2009. P. 1-105.
 Intersectional approach in the study of trajectories of sociocultural integration of people with migration experience | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2022. № 478. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/478/8

Intersectional approach in the study of trajectories of sociocultural integration of people with migration experience | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2022. № 478. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/478/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 462