Formation of the meaning of pedagogical activity in future teachers
The effectiveness of any type of professional activity is associated with a clear and scientifically grounded understanding of its meaning. The article proves that the formation of the meaning of pedagogical activity should become one of the leading directions of the educational process in a professional pedagogical educational institution. The similar approaches of Russian and foreign scientists to the organization of professional training of future teachers are revealed, which consist in taking into account such components of the meaning of pedagogical activity as value, purpose and motive. The meaning of pedagogical activity is defined as a complex category of professional worldview that integrates the interconnected system of “values-goals-motives-actions”, implemented in the aggregate of interactions of participants in the educational process. Among the main characteristics of the meaning of pedagogical activity, the following are highlighted: determination by the level of professional outlook and practical experience; determination by the sociohistorical context and features of the national education system, in which the personality of the future teacher is formed; dynamism and continuity of development; stability due to professional convictions; interrelation and interdependence of the meaning of life and professional activity of the teacher, as well as the meanings of the participants in the educational process. The results of the study of the opinions of future teachers (first year students and graduates) about the meaning of pedagogical activity are analyzed. The leading role of a professional educational institution in the formation of the meaning of pedagogical activity among future teachers is discovered. The methodological experience of the formation of the meaning of pedagogical activity among students of a pedagogical college is described. Within the framework of the “multi-technology” approach, methods of various educational technologies that can be combined in the formation of the meaning of pedagogical activity are highlighted. The forms and methods of organizing the educational process, the most effective in the formation of the meaning of pedagogical activity, are highlighted. These are problematic and heuristic questions and tasks, the solution of pedagogical situations, the discussion pedagogical club, the study of the activities and main ideas of humanist teachers in the course of an educational project and practice at school. It has been established that the content of academic disciplines should include such interrelated components as the meaning of the subject-subject interaction of the participants in the educational process, the meaning of the implementation of the mission of the teacher and the pupil, the meaning of professional self-education and self-development.
Keywords
meaning,
pedagogical activity,
future teacher,
formation,
professional educationAuthors
| Hazanov Ilya Ya. | Kurgan State University; Kurgan Pedagogical College | hazanovilya@gmail.com |
Всего: 1
References
Frankl V. Man's Search for Meaning. Beacon Press, 1992. 155 p.
Yim J.S.C., Moses P. Work factors and teacher satisfaction: The mediating effect of cynicism toward educational change // Issues in Educational Research. 2016. Vol. 26 (4). P. 694-709.
Rucker T. Teaching and the Claim of Bildung: The View from General Didactics // Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2020. Vol. 39. P. 51-69. doi: 10.1007/s11217-019-09673-0
Дмитриева Е.Н. Парадигма смыслообразующей педагогической подготовки учителя // Высшее образование в России. 2011. № 3. С. 75-80.
Басалаева Н.В. Становление ценностно-смыслового отношения к будущей профессии у студентов // Сибирский педагогический журнал. 2010. № 11. С. 113-118.
Евдокимова Е. Г. Педагогический контекст смыслообразования // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2014. № 14 (4). С. 95-99.
Герт В. А. Событийная природа смыслообразования в педагогическом взаимодействии // Педагогическое образование в России. 2011. № 4. С. 186-192.
Asio J.M.R., De Dios E.E.R. The college students' perspective on what makes an educator well-qualified // Journal of Pedagogical Research. 2019. Vol. 3 (3). P. 126-138.
Andrews M.C. A dissertation submitted to the school of education and the committee on graduate studies of Stanford University in partial fulfill ment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. 2007. 159 p. URL: http://purl.stanford.edu/qp476bx9339
McDonald M., Kazemi E., Schneider Kavanagh S. Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity // Journal of Teacher Education. 2013. Vol. 64 (5). P. 378-386. doi: 10.1177/0022487113493807
Tovkanets G. Moral values in pedagogical activity // Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny. 2018. Vol. 37 (3). doi: 10.17951/lrp.2018.37.3.237-2443
Rajala A. Expanding the Context of Pedagogical Activity to the Surrounding Communities // Psychology & Society. 2019. Vol. 11 (1). P. 161-175.
Bernardes M.E.M., Alves A.A. The Pedagogical Activity in the Training of Teachers: Contributions from the Cultural-Historical Theory // Creative Education. 2015. Vol. 6. P. 1496-1507.
Lefstein A., Vedder-Weiss D., Segal A. Relocating Research on Teacher Learning: Toward Pedagogically Productive Talk // Educational Researcher. 2020. Vol. 49 (5). P. 360-368.
Eshchar-Netz L., Vedder-Weiss D. Teacher learning in communities of practice: The affordances of co-planning for novice and veteran teachers' learning // Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2020. Vol. 1(26). doi: 10.1002/tea.21663
De Simone C. Problem-Based Learning: a framework for prospective teachers' pedagogical problem solving // Teacher Development: An international journal of teachers' professional development. 2008. Vol. 12 (3). P. 179-191. doi: 10.1080/136645308022592064
Van der Wal-Maris S., Beijaard D., Schellings G.L.M., Geldens J. How meaning-oriented learning is enhanced in Dutch academic primary teacher education // Teacher Development. 2018. Vol. 22 (3). P. 375-393. doi: 10.1080/13664530.2018.1442874
De Jong L., Meirink J., Admiraal W. School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019. Vol. 86. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102925
Верхотурова Ю., Галагузова Ю. Педагогическая деятельность как психолого-педагогический феномен // Педагогическое образование в России. 2019. Vol. 3. С. 62-66. doi: 10.26170/po19-03-09
Ерошенкова Е.И. Просоциальная направленность педагогической деятельности в современной науке и образовании: от сущности к содержанию // Научный результат. Педагогика и психология образования. 2019. № 5 (2). С. 3-16. doi: 10.18413/2313-8971-2019-5-2-0-1
Evsetsova E., Dobrotvorskaya S., Ponomarev A. Pedagogical Orientation of Student Teachers to Universal Values // Proceedings IFTE-2019. 2019. P. 115-120. doi: 10.3897/ap.1.e0105
Seryapina Y. The concept of «readiness for pedagogical activity»: motivational readiness, psychological readiness, readiness to innovative activity // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences. 2018. Vol. 10 (4). P. 77-86. doi: 10.14529/ped1804109
Федеральный государственный образовательный стандарт среднего профессионального образования по специальности 44.02.05 Коррекционная педагогика в начальном образовании. 2018 // Гарант.ру. URL: https://base.garant.ru/71910764/53f89421bbdaf741eb2d1ecc4ddb4c33/
Профессиональный стандарт «Педагог (педагогическая деятельность в сфере дошкольного, начального общего, основного общего, среднего общего образования) (воспитатель, учитель)». 2013 // Гарант.ру. URL: https://base.garant.ru/70535556/
Стратегия развития воспитания в Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года. 2015 // Правительство России - официальный сайт. URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/f5Z8H9tgUK5Y9qtJ0tEFnyHlBitwN4gB.pdf
Hazanov I. The main methodological approaches and the principle of multi-technology to teaching pedagogy in the process of training of future teachers: Russian experience // Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology. 2019. № 2. P. 53-64.
