Prospects of metacognition research for the development of natural and artificial intelligence
Today the research on metacognitive processes is mostly conducted in practice-oriented scientific fields: psychology, pedagogy, and the development of artificial intelligence systems. But philosophy (in particular, epistemology) has the theoretical potential to explicate metacognition. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify the philosophical and methodological foundations of metacognition, as well as promising areas of research and development of metacognitive strategies for the development of natural intelligence and artificial intelligence. Based on a philosophical and methodological analysis, the article provides a philosophical interpretation of the concept of metacognition and its elements: meta-knowledge, metacognitive experience, and metacognitive regulation. The article reveals the ontological and epistemological prerequisites for studying metacognitive processes and draws analogies with relevant topics in philosophy. The author clarifies the relationship between knowledge and information, cautions against reducing knowledge to data or information, and substantiates the relationship between meta-knowledge and wisdom as characteristics of the maturity of consciousness. The research revealed three aspects of the study of metacognition: reflexive, epistemological, and ontological. As a result, the author highlights the role of reflection in the formation of metacognition in natural intelligence, taking into account the peculiarities of personal epistemology development. Then the author asserts the formation of a metacognitive subject as an observer with metareflexion. At the same time, the role of implicit knowledge is substantiated on the basis of the 4E-approach in cognition (embodied, embedded, enacted, extended). This leads to the understanding of the integrity of the cognitive situation, in which both bodily experience and subjective experiences are important, as well as skills of self-organization and self-regulation being the part of the metacognitive triad. The study of the use of metacognitive strategies in the development of artificial intelligence revealed the possibilities and limitations of metacognition for artificial systems related to their "metacognitive myopia". The author makes the conclusion about a tendency of interdisciplinary research combining philosophy and theories of consciousness, personal epistemology and metacognition to transform the process of the "natural - artificial intelligence" system development, in which human intelligence plays a leading role, and artificial intelligence plays an auxiliary role. The article ends with the conclusion about the inevitable development of metacognition as an individual metacognitive competence and the relevance of the formation of a metacognitive strategic type of thinking. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
wisdom,
implicit knowledge,
reflexive knowledge,
personal epistemology,
metacognitive strategy,
metacognitive experience,
metacognitionAuthors
| Loginovskaya Yuliya V. | National Research Tomsk State University | urucel@yandex.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Johnson S.G.B., Karimi A.-H., Bengio Y., Chater N., Gerstenberg T., Larson K., Levine S., Mitchell M., Rahwan I., Scholkopf B., Grossmann I. Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition // arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02478. 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02478 (дата обращения: 08.11.2024).
Wei H. et al. Metacognitive AI: Framework and the Case for a Neurosymbolic Approach // International Conference on Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. P. 60-67.
Bay Y. et al. Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback // arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073. 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073 (дата обращения: 21.09.2024).
Ball D.W. The Era of Predictive AI Is Almost Over // The New Atlantis. 2024. 3 77. P. 26-35. URL: https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publica-tions/the-era-of-predictive-ai-is-almost-over (дата обращения: 08.09.2024).
Marcus G., Leivada E., Murphy E. A Sentence is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Can Large Language Models Understand Human Language? 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.00109.
Hofer B.K., Bendixen L.D. Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions // Harris K.R., Graham S., Urdan T., McCormick C.B., Sinatra G.M., Sweller J. (Eds.) APA educational psychology handbook. Vol. 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues. American Psychological Association. 2012. P. 227-256.
Филипенок C.A. Неявное знание в цифровой гуманитаристике // Вопросы философии. 2023. № 9. С. 103-113.
Луман Н. Введение в системную теорию. М.: Логос, 2007. 360 с.
Аршинов В. И., Буданов В. Г. Системы и сети в контексте парадигмы сложности // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 1. С. 50-61.
Fagnant A., Crahay M. Theories of Mind and Personal Epistemology: Their Interrelation and Connection with the Concept of Metacognition // European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2011. Vol. 26, № 2. P. 257-271.
Мамардашвили М.К. Стрела познания (набросок естественноисторической гносеологии). М.: Языки русской культуры, 1997. 304 с.
Кутырев В. А. Трансцендентальная феноменология как философско-историческое (пред)шествие инфокогнитивной реальности // Философская мысль. 2013. № 7. С. 100-135.
Карпов A.B., Карпов A. A. Структура метакогнитивной регуляции информационной деятельности. Ярославль: Филигрань, 2022. 816 с.
Розов М.А. Философия науки в новом видении. М.: Новый хронограф, 2012. 440 с.
Агацци Э. Эпистемология и социальное: петля обратной связи // Вопросы философии. 2010. № 7. С. 58-66.
Басина Н.И., Ковалёва E.A. Мудрость как социально-философская проблема // Advanced Engineering Research (Rostov-on-Don). 2012. № 2-2 (63). C. 104-109.
Merkebu J., Kitsantas A., Durning S.J., Ma T. What is metacognitive reflection? The moderating role of metacognition on emotional regulation and reflection // Frontiers in Education. 2023. Vol. 8.
Пигров К.С. Проблема единства знания и технологическая цивилизация // Естественнонаучное и социогуманитарное знание: методологические аспекта! взаимодействия: межвуз. сборник. 1990. C. 126-134.
Ackoff R.L. From data to wisdom // Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. 1989. № 6. P. 3-9.
Никифоров А.Л. Анализ понятия "знание": подходы и проблемы // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2009. № 3. С. 61-73.
Weinstein C., Mayer R. The Teaching of Learning Strategies // Wittrock M. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan, 1986. P. 315-327.
Keestra M. Metacognition and Reflection by Interdisciplinary Experts: Insights from Cognitive Science and Philosophy // Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. 2017. Vol. 35. P. 121-169.
Burkhard R.A. Knowledge Visualization: The Use of Complementary Visual Representations for the Transfer of Knowledge. A Model, a Framework, and Four New Approaches: Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Sciences. 2005. 156 p.
Костромина C.H., Гнедых Д.С. Информация и знание: подходы к пониманию процессов усвоения информации и формированию знаний в обучении // Вестник ЛГУ им. А.С. Пушкина. 2015. № 2. С. 5-14.
Лопарева Т. А. Познавательные стратегии и их роль в процессе обучения грамматической стороне говорения // Теория и практика образования в современном мире: материалы III Междунар. науч. конф. (г. Санкт-Петербург, май 2013 г.). СПб.: Реноме, 2013. С. 144-146.
Фуко M. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук. М., 1977. 407 с.
Zohar A., Ben David A. Paving a clear path in a thick forest: a conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component // Metacognition Learning. 2009. № 4. P. 177-195.
Dinsmore D.L., Alexander P.A., Louglin S.M. Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning // Educational Psychology Review. 2008.
Russel B. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth: The William James Lectures for 1940 Delivered at Harvard University. London, N-W: Psychology Press, 1995. 352 p.
Чалмерс Д. Сознающий ум: В поисках фундаментальной теории / пер. с англ. М.: УРСС: Книжный дом ЛИБРОКОМ, 2013. 509 с.
Тихонов Р.В., Аммалайнен А.В., Морошкина Н.В. Многообразие метакогнитивных чувств: разные феномены или разните термины? // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология и педагогика. 2018. Т. 8, вып. 3. С. 219-242. 10.21638/11701/ spbu16.2018.302.
Kompa J.S. Metacognition (Part 2): What Makes Us Truly Human? A Literature Review. 2017. URL: https://joanakompa.com/2017/08/28/meta-cognition-part-2-what-makes-us-truly-human-a-literature-review/(дата обращения: 08.09.2024).
Халин С.М. Познание и метапознание: проблема типологического единства. Тюмень: Изд-во Тюменского гос. ун-та, 2018. 352 с.
Flavell J.H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring a new area of cognitive developmental Inquiry // American Psychologist. 1979. № 34 (10). P. 906-911.
Эпистемология вчера и сегодня / отв. ред. В. А. Лекторский. М.: ИФРАН, 2010. 188 с.
Карпов А.В., Карпов А. А., Субботина Л.Ю. Методологические и методические основы исследования метакогнитивных детерминант организации деятельности // Российский психологический журнал. 2017. № 1. С. 149-175.
