Uncertainty and the transformation of methodology in the technoscientific field | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2025. № 517. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/517/8

Uncertainty and the transformation of methodology in the technoscientific field

Technoscience, as a project that is fundamentally methodological, continues the theme of rational constructivism, which originates from the ancient Greek concept of "mimesis" (ppnalg) - a creative act aimed at imitating nature. Its essence lies in a volitional action that conceals the "technical" (isvn) as a means of arriving at an artful, artificial mode of being. However, the fundamental novelty of technoscience lies in its transcendence of the boundaries of mimesis, shifting its foundation from a constructive design to "imitation" as "mimicry" (pipnnapog) - a dissolution and concealment within natural processes themselves. The directed effort of technoscience penetrates the core of natural cycles and is recognized as an immersion into the event of "exchange" (informational, material, molecular, etc.) across various levels of reality, utilizing the instrumental domain of science. Its basis is corrective engineering manipulation, which uncovers new stable forms within molecular, cellular, genetic, informational, social, and other structures. Within this framework, the role of "uncertainty," initially introduced by the synergetic paradigm, becomes more clear and tangible. It by no means coincides with the concept of "chaos" (annihilation, confusion); rather, it reveals the dissolution of established boundaries and connections, residing within the domain of self-organization and exposing a local zone of nature's actions. From the author's perspective, uncertainty, manifesting as a "trading zone" (P. Galison), contains an infinite multitude of ways in which a thing or event discloses itself. In this regard, the level of nanostructures is illustrative, as they can be both particles participating in mechanosynthesis (nanomachines) and interfaces (multilayer nanosystems, zones of local inhomogeneities). Modeling merely determines the combination of constraints in the physical process of creating nanostructures. However, the emphasis is moving towards manipulation practices: the use of quantum nanobots, mechanosynthesis, actuator control, etc. Technoscience, on the one hand, is guided by the methodological synthesis of diverse forms of knowledge. On the other hand, it operates within various levels of (physis), penetrating the event of "exchange" and engineering stability and coordination where none existed before. Thus, the theme of "atomic reductionism" is being supplanted by the methodology of mimicry, which pays homage to the power of uncertainty. This power, while serving as a source of new discoveries across various levels of reality, simultaneously produces a manifold increase in objective unreliability in the reproduction of nanotechnologies (A. Grunwald) The author declares no conflicts of interests.

Download file
Counter downloads: 3

Keywords

uncertainty, mimesis, mimicry, methodology, technoscientific objects, nanotechnology, synergetic paradigm

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Dovgalenko Natalya V.Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratovdovgal30@rambler.ru
Всего: 1

References

Фейерабенд П. Против метода. М. : АСТ ; АСТ МОСКВА ; ХРАНИТЕЛЬ, 2007. 413 с.
Волкова Г.Д. Когнитивные технологии в инженерной деятельности // Вестник МГТУ «Станкин». 2010. № 4 (12). С. 151-157.
Горохов В.Г. Баллистика Никколо Тартальи, технонаука Галилея и нанотехнонаука: аристотелевская физика сквозь века // Философия науки. Т. 20 / Институт философии РАН. 2015. С. 7-36.
Белялетдинов Р. Р. Онтологии биотехнологических рисков: социогуманитарные методологии и технонаука // Горизонты гуманитарного знания. 2018. № 5. С. 29-38.
Пригожин И. Порядок из хаоса: Новый диалог человека с природой. М. : УРСС, 2003. 310 с.
Головко Н.В. Общая теория относительности и онтология Дж. Лоу // Сибирский философский журнал. 2021. Т. 19, № 3. С. 5-32.
Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. Ч. I. От эпических теокосмогоний до возникновения атомистики. М. : Наука, 1989. 576 с.
Хайдеггер М. Г ераклит. СПб. : ВЛАДИМИР ДА.ЛЬ, 2011. 504 с.
Вударт Б. Динамика слизи. Зарождение, мутация и ползучесть жизни. Пермь : Гиле Пресс, 2016. 124 с.
Протопопова И. А., Тарабанов А.Г., Кулыгин С.В. Чтение Платона как работа с собственным сознанием: интервью с И. А. Протопоповой // Ecce Homo. 2022. № 1 (3). С. 51-66.
Брассье Р. Танатоз Просвещения // Логос. 2019. Т. 29, № 4. С. 83-106.
Андреев А. Л., Бутырин П.А. Технонаука как инновационный социальный проект // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2011. Т. 81, № 3. С.197-203.
Заммоев А.У., Абуталипов Р.Н. Каталитические самоходные нанодвижители как основа элементной базы для проектирования наномехатронных устройств и систем для бионаномашин в бионаноробототехнике // Известия Кабардино-Балкарского научного центра РАН. 2018. № 6-2 (86). С. 149-156.
Соколов Д. Особенности патентования микро- и наномашин // Наноиндустрия. 2012. № 3 (33). С. 50-53.
Соваж Ж.-П. Мы изменили представление о молекулах // Лаборатория и производство. 2019. № 4 (8). С. 10-25.
Горохов В.Г. Трансформация понятия «машина» в нанотехнологии // Вопросы философии. 2009. № 9. С. 97-115.
Галисон П. Зона обмена: координация убеждений и действий // Вопросы истории естествознания и техники. 2004. № 1. С. 64-91.
Castro M., Sancristobal E. From Technology Enhanced Learning to Ethics and Critical Thinking as part ofthe Engineering Education: Skill Driven with Humanities Comprehension // International journal of engineering pedagogy. 2020. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 4-6.
Грунвальд А. Этика для нанотехнологии // Философия науки и техники. 2015. Т. 20, вып. 1. С. 126-143.
Мишаткина Т.В. Этические проблемы нанотехнологий в контексте экологии человека // Лесной вестник. 2015. № 4. С. 49-56.
Heidmann I., Milde J.Communication about scientific uncertainty: how scientists and science journalists deal with uncertainties in nanoparticle research // Environmental Sciences Europe. 2013. № 25. doi: 10.1186/2190-4715-25-25.
 Uncertainty and the transformation of methodology in the technoscientific field | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2025. № 517. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/517/8

Uncertainty and the transformation of methodology in the technoscientific field | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2025. № 517. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/517/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 120