Periodization of sports training as a method for complex development of students' physical abilities at university-based military training centers
The problem of concurrent training is not given sufficient attention in modern research. The simultaneous development of motor abilities, such as strength and endurance, is a complex process requiring a specific programming of different training loads (i.e. resistance and aerobic exercises). One of the areas where concurrent strength and aerobic training are considered crucial is military physical training. However, there are gaps in methodological base providing the necessary planning tools, especially in such institutions as university-based military training centers (or MTCs), where students undergo military training while studying their "civilian" profession to become career officer, meaning that they are commissioned as officers after graduation to continue their professional military service. One of the effective ways to combine various training stimuli is a principle of periodization initially developed by L.P. Matveev in the 1950s. His concept was consolidated in sports methodology as a "traditional" or "linear" periodization and introduced a new planning approach with a division of training process into such units as exercise, session, microcycle, mesocycle, periods and macrocycle. Since then the periodization theory has become an inherent tool in sports training. Soon the first critical remarks came from the theorist and methodologist community. The visible critics were Y.V. Verkhoshansky and V.B. Issurin, who claimed that traditional periodization was suboptimal and required reconsideration. Thus, the new concept of block periodization appeared. It involved a consecutive introduction into the training process of specialized blocks aimed at developing different motor abilities. However, both linear and block periodization principles were predominantly designed for use in sports training, but when it comes to military physical training, the effectiveness of the abovementioned methods is questionable. So, the compromise between traditional and block concepts may be found in another principle called non-linear or undulating periodization with two main iterations (weekly and daily). It implies a more frequent stimulus for different training components (strength and endurance) at lower levels of planning, such as micro- and mesocycles. In this way, to solve the problem of insufficient physical development of students at university-based military training centers, the article suggests using the principle of sports training periodization. Since the development of professionally relevant physical abilities, such as strength and endurance, requires a complex application of multidirectional training stimuli, the research implements non-linear undulating periodization as training load programming method. The experimental work proved effectiveness of the planning principle in question for achieving a level of physical fitness necessary to meet the requirements for commissioned officers. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
physical education of students,
military training centers,
military physical training,
motor abilities,
sports training periodization,
non-liner undulating periodizationAuthors
| Ignatov Artem A. | National Research Tomsk State University | ignatooov@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Simmons L. The conjugate method: Enhanced through the research of Westside Barbell. Westside Barbell, 2022. 122 p.
Шолих М. Круговая тренировка. М. : Физкультура и спорт, 1966. 174 с.
Viada A. The hybrid athlete. 2015. 239 p.
Baechle T.R., Earle R.W. NSCA'S essentials of strength training and conditioning. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL : Human Kinetics, 2008. 641 p.
Матвеев Л.П. К теории построения спортивной тренировки // Теория и практика физической культуры. 1991. № 12. С. 11-20.
Матвеев Л.П. Заметки по поводу некоторых новаций во взглядах на теорию спортивной тренировки // Теория и практика физической культуры. 1995. № 12. С. 49-52.
Верхошанский Ю.В. Программирование и организация тренировочного процесса. М. : ФиС, 1985. 175 с.
Верхошанский Ю.В. Программирование тренировки и принципиальные модели системы ее построения в годичном цикле // Научноспортивный вестник. 1983. № 2. С. 11-16. 9, Верхошанский Ю.В. Принципы организации тренировки спортсменов высшего класса в годичном цикле // Теория и практика физической культуры. 1991. № 2. С. 24-31.
Иссурин В.Б. Блоковая периодизация спортивной тренировки. М. : Советский спорт, 2010. 288 с.
Зиновьев Д.А., Старостин С.К., Якимов А.М. Ноу-хау в контроле за подготовленностью бегунов на средние и длинные дистанции // Год 2008-й : Науч. альм. МГАФК / ред.-сост. В.Б. Коренберг. Малаховка, 2008. Т. 9. С. 26-31.
Tavares L.D., de Souza E.O., Ugrinowitsch C., Laurentino G.C., Roschel H., Aihara A.Y., Cardoso F.N., Tricoli V. Effects of different strength training frequencies during reduced training period on strength and muscle cross-sectional area // European Journal of Sport Sciences. 2017. Vol. 17 (6). P. 665-672. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1298673.
Trappe S., Williamson D., Godard M. Maintenance of whole muscle strength and size following resistance training in older men // The Journals of Gerontology. Series A. Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2002. Vol. 57 (4). P. B138-B143. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.4.b138.
Бомпа Т., Буццичелли К. А. Периодизация спортивной тренировки / пер. с англ. М. Прокопьевой. 3-е изд. М. : Спорт, 2016. 383 с.
Евланников Л.Н. Совершенствование базовой физической подготовки курсантов военно-технического училища федеральной службы охраны России : дис.. канд. пед. наук. Тамбов, 2008. 139 с.
Кузнецов И.А., Тындык В.И., Шершнев В.А. Особенности самостоятельной физической тренировки военнослужащих // Вестник Балтийского федерального университета им. И. Канта. 2011. Вып. 11. С. 126-129.
Матвеев Л.П. Теория и методика физической культуры (общие основы теории и методики физического воспитания; теоретикометодические аспекты спорта и профессиональноприкладных форм физической культуры) : учеб. для инc-тов физ. культуры. М. : Физкультура и спорт, 1991. 543 с.
Приказ Министра обороны РФ от 20.04.2023 г. № 230 «Об утверждении Наставления по физической подготовке в Вооруженных Силах Российской Федерации».
Наставление по физической подготовке в Вооруженных силах (НФП-2009). М. : РИЦ ГШ ВС РФ, 2009. 200 с.
Israetel M., Hoffman J., Smith C.W. Scientific Principles of Strength Training: With Applications to Powerlifting. Publisher Review, 2015. 337 p.
Потемина А.М. Двигательные адаптации человека к сезонному действию холода : автореф. дис. канд. мед. наук. Архангельск, 2014. 19 с.
Самсонова А.В. Гипертрофия скелетных мышц человека. СПб., 2011. 203 с.
Двурекова Е.А., Артемьева С.С., Попова И.Е. Структурно-функциональная организация скелетной мышечной ткани. Воронеж : ВГИФК, 2019. 175 с.
Селезнева И.С., Иванцова М.Н. Биохимические изменения при занятиях физкультурой и спортом : учеб. пособие. Екатеринбург : Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2019. 162 с.
Poliquin C. Five steps to increasing the effectiveness of your strength training program // NSCA Journal. 1988. Vol. 10. P. 34-39.
Buford T.W., Rossi S.J., Smith D.B., Warren A.J. A comparison of periodization models during 9 weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength // Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2007. Vol. 21 (4). P. 1245-1250. doi: 10.1519/R-20446.1.
Miranda F., Simao R., Rhea M., Bunker D., Prestes J., Leite R.D., Miranda H., de Salles B.F., Novaes J. Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains // Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011. Vol. 25 (7). P. 1824-1830. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e7ff75.
Prestes J., De Lima C., Frollini A.B., Donatto F.F., Conte M.Comparision of linear and reverse linear periodization effects on body composition and maximal strength // Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009. Vol. 23 (1). P. 266-274. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874bf3.
Rhea M.R. Synthesizing strength and conditioning research: The Meta-analysis // Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2004. Vol. 18 (4). P. 921-923. doi: 10.1519/14223.1.