Psychological features of master and doctoral students at universities oriented towards classical and engineering education | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 367.

Psychological features of master and doctoral students at universities oriented towards classical and engineering education

The emerging knowledge-based society is calling for countries' innovative development as one of the global challenges. From the psychological perspective, innovative activity is defined as a form of human activity realized by 'going beyond', i.e. going beyond the existing attitudes and behavioural patterns (V.Ye. Klochko). In this connection, potentiality is becoming a key factor of human personal and professional development. One of the main goals of modernizing the current system of higher education in Russia is to promote university students' research and entrepreneurial activity which is innovative by its very essence. The paper presents the study which was firstly aimed at examining possible relationships between university master and doctoral students' career orientations and characteristics of their personal potential. The second research question was how the study participants' subjective evaluation of basic value realizability in the local settings (Tomsk is viewed as a region with high innovative potential) was related to their career orientations. The study subjects represented two universities of Tomsk (both have gained the status of the National Research University), one of which is considered to be a classical university (Tomsk State University); the other mainly provides engineering education in a great variety of fields (Tomsk Polytechnic University). The results obtained revealed statistically significant between-group differences in a number of career orientations including that towards entrepreneurship. The Polytechnic University master and doctoral students were more oriented towards entrepreneurial and innovative activity and this could be interpreted as their higher competitiveness and better employability perspectives in the current economic situation. Moreover, their orientation towards entrepreneurship was positively correlated with a number of self-organization of activity parameters (characteristics of personal potential). In turn, this means that the more representatives of this university are oriented towards entrepreneurial activity, the more purposeful, inclined to planning, focused on the present and persistent they are in their activity. Meanwhile, the State University master and doctoral students (only science students were included in the analysis) showed a significant positive correlation between their innovative index scores and a number of self-determination parameters (characteristics of personal potential). In other words, the more representatives of this university are oriented towards innovative activity, the more they feel that their life has value and meaning, it is in accordance with their desires and intentions and they follow their own way. As for subjective evaluation of basic value realizability, the two groups showed positive evaluation, but the State University master and doctoral students had higher scores. It can be suggested that representatives of this university are likely to be less realistic compared with their counterparts, who differ in their practicality and pragmatism. Moreover, both groups believed Tomsk to be first of all favourable for love and marriage and only then for their professional development and career perspectives. Therefore, it is necessary to develop special measures enabling university students to be more aware of the local potential for their personal and professional development.

Download file
Counter downloads: 410

Keywords

ценностные ориентации, базисные ценности, личностный потенциал, ориентация на предпринимательство, классическое и инженерное образование, career orientations, basic values, personal potential, orientation towards entrepreneurship, classical and engineering education

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Atamanova Inna V.Tomsk State Universityiatamanova@yandex.ru
Starichenko Olga N.Tomsk State Universityolapsy@sibmail.com
Bogomaz Sergey A.Tomsk State Universitybogomazsa@mail.ru
Всего: 3

References

Клочко В.Е., Галажинский Э.В. Исследование инновационного потенциала личности: концептуальные основания // Сибирский психологиче ский журнал. 2009. № 33. С. 6-12.
Jenkins A., Breen R., Lindsay R., Brew A. Reshaping Teaching in Higher Education: Linking Teaching with Research. Abingdon: Routledge Limited, 2003. 224 р.
Бохан Т.Г., Баланев Д.Ю., Мацута ВВ. и др. Личностная готовность к инновационному поведению молодежи народов Сибири // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2011. № 348. С. 110-114.
Сметанова Ю.В. Личностный потенциал как ресурсная составляющая инновационно-предпринимательской направленности : автореф. дис.. канд. психол. наук. Томск, 2012. 24 с.
Стратегия инновационного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2020 года. Москва, 2011. URL: http://government.ru/media/2011/ 12/21/46988/file/2227-pril.doc
Schumpeter J. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1934. 255 p.
Чирикова А.Е. Психологические особенности личности предпринимателя // Психологический журнал. 1990. № 1. С. 167-169.
Дрок Т.Е. Методические подходы по активизации использования «человеческого капитала» в малом предпринимательстве (на примере Ка лининградской области) : дис.. канд. экон. наук. Калининград, 2006. 285 с.
Filion L. Defining the entrepreneur. Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar Publishing Inc., 2011. Р. 41-52.
Слободчиков В.И. Деятельность как антропологическая категория // Вопросы философии. 2001. № 3. С. 16-23.
Леонтьев Д.А., Мандрикова Е.Ю., Осин Е.Н. и др. Опыт структурной диагностики личностного потенциала // Психологическая диагностика. 2007. № 1. С. 8-31.
Богомаз С.А., Каракулова О.В. Личностный и коммуникативный потенциал инновационно- и предпринимательски-ориентированных субь ектов // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2010. № 37. С. 48-51.
Богомаз С.А, Мацута ВВ. Оценка личностного потенциала и выявление основных типов ориентации на профессиональную деятельность у современной вузовской молодежи // Психология обучения. 2010. № 12. С. 77-88.
Богомаз С.А. Модификация опросника «Якоря карьеры»: ориентация на инновационную и предпринимательскую деятельность // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2012. № 44. С. 101-109.
Dialogues in Urban Planning: Towards Sustainable Regions. Sydney : Sydney University Press, 2008. 252 p.
Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York : Basic Books, 2002. 416 p.
Богомаз С.А., Мацута В.В. Субъективная оценка реализуемости базисных ценностей в городской среде // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2012.
Прокопьев В.П. Федеральный университет и классическое образование // Университетское управление. 2010. № 6. С. 28-32. URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/06/23/1267355271/2010-6-4.pdf
 Psychological features of master and doctoral students at universities oriented towards classical and engineering education | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 367.

Psychological features of master and doctoral students at universities oriented towards classical and engineering education | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 367.

Download file