Why Derrida doesn't acknowledge the concept of split or cleft reference? | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 1999. № 267.

Why Derrida doesn't acknowledge the concept of split or cleft reference?

This paper discusses the very populare concept of abolition or suspension of the ostensive character of reference. We examine the studies of French philosopher P. Ricoeur as example of this position. We argue that preservation of this position will regenerate the picture of language as medium of representation and expression. We argue also that this interpretation will regenerate the key problems of traditional philosophy. The idea of split or cleft reference are connected with attempt to reduce the truth value of any proposition to ostensive function. The solution of problem we connect with use of the concept of deconstruction. The use of this idea save as from necessity to say about reference or ostensive character of reference.

Download file
Counter downloads: 268

Keywords

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Syrov Vasily N.Tomsk State University
Всего: 1

References

Ницше Ф. Воля к власти: опыт переоценки всех ценностей. М.: REFL-book, 1994. 352 с.
Shepherdson Ch. History and the Real: Foucault with Laoan// Postmodern Culture. Vol. 5. № 2 (January, 1995).
Деррида Ж. Позиции. Киев. Д. Л., 1996. 192 о.
Nancy J.-L. Finite History // The states of "theory". History, art and critical discourse. Edited and with an introduction by D. Carroll. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990. P. 149-172.
White H. Historical Text as Literary Artifact // The Writing of History. Literary Form and Historical Understanding. Ed. by R. H.Canary and H. Kozicki. The University of Wisconsin Press, 1978. P. 41-62.
Ricoeur P. Can fictional narratives be true? // Analecta Husserliana. The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research. 1983. VoL XIV. The Phenomenology of Man and Human Condition in individualization of Nature and the Human Being. В Reidel Publishing Company. P. 3-19.
Ricoeur P. Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge university press, 1995.314 p.
Философия и литература. Беседа с Ж. Деррида // Жак Деррида в Москве: деконструкция путешествия. М. РИК "Культура", 1993. С. 1J1-186.
 Why Derrida doesn't acknowledge the concept of split or cleft reference? | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 1999. № 267.

Why Derrida doesn't acknowledge the concept of split or cleft reference? | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 1999. № 267.

Download file