Theatres of noesis: true contemplation and free action

Leaning upon F.Bacon and G.Shpet's ideas the author argues about the nature of noesis in view of the following theoretical reason: what is noesis`s true contemplation and free action in a context of the doctrine about idola theatri? What is the interaction between poethis and noesis during the process of becoming theoretical knowledge? What decision of a problem is offered within the tradition of Russian philosophical idea? The F.Bacon's project of human reason, free from the consent in error, did not assume the refusal of approach true to be true: methodical eradication of idols had no intention to slight neither feelings, nor personal experience, neither belief, nor cultural traditions and authority of art. Hence, a question is: how much reasons and borders of theoretical reason will be coordinated with other true of the person? - instead of in an aggressive temptation of illusive claims of noesis unlimited opportunities. Or, along the same lines, - how much the pure reason is capable to avoid last scepticism of theoretical idea? At the crossroads aspirations to true and wanderings in true noesis are also justified by time immemorial critical spirit, connecting ways of reason with judgment of a human way. And in this quality knowledge is always an essence ethos of an epoch, approving the claims to true. In Russia G. Shpet was one of the first who explored an independent theme and has started to study dynamic unity of creative components of consciousness in detail. The thinker has convincingly proved that in dynamics of transformation, noesis cultivates and creates a special space - sphere is formal-conceivable, sphere of pure ontological forms, - that is, not abolishing but continuing the work of a poetic action. Hence, the historical role of noesis - destruction, is more true; it is the exhaustion of a myth; it cannot be executed completely and is expressive-poetic experience of an epoch

Keywords

Authors

References